scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The fourth edition of the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes as mentioned in this paper has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.
Abstract
The purpose of economic evaluation is to inform decisions intended to improve healthcare. The new edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes equips the reader with the necessary tools and understanding required to undertake evaluations by providing an outline of key principles and a 'tool kit' based on the authors' own experiences of undertaking economic evaluations. Building on the strength of the previous edition, the accessible writing style ensures the text is key reading for the non-expert reader, as no prior knowledge of economics is required. The book employs a critical appraisal framework, which is useful both to researchers conducting studies and to decision-makers assessing them. Practical examples are provided throughout to aid learning and understanding. The book discusses the analytical and policy challenges that face health systems in seeking to allocate resources efficiently and fairly. New chapters include 'Principles of economic evaluation' and 'Making decisions in healthcare' which introduces the reader to core issues and questions about resource allocation, and provides an understanding of the fundamental principles which guide decision making. A key part of evidence-based decision making is the analysis of all the relevant evidence to make informed decisions and policy. The new chapter 'Identifying, synthesising and analysing evidence' highlights the importance of systematic review, and how and why these methods are used. As methods of analysis continue to develop, the chapter on 'Characterising, reporting and interpreting uncertainty' introduces the reader to recent methods of analysis and why characterizing uncertainty matters for health care decisions. The fourth edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A uniform time trade off method for states better and worse than dead: feasibility study of the 'lead time' approach.

TL;DR: It is concluded that the approach is feasible for use in valuation studies and appears to overcome the discontinuity in values around 0 evident in conventional methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nanomaterials Designed for Antiviral Drug Delivery Transport across Biological Barriers

TL;DR: The authors present an overview on the requirements for the design of antiviral nanotherapeutics and important reflections on nanomedicines currently approved or undergoing investigations for the treatment of viral infections.
Journal ArticleDOI

EQ-5D as a quality of life measure in people with dementia and their carers: evidence and key issues.

TL;DR: There are problems with the validity of self-rated data because of a lack of association between patient and proxy ratings, and the impact of dementia on carer's quality of life should be included in economic evaluation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimizing Statin Treatment for Primary Prevention of Coronary Artery Disease

TL;DR: A tailored treatment strategy prevents more CAD events while treating fewer persons with high-dose statins than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-based target approaches and results were robust, even with assumptions favoring a treat-to-target approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

Training practitioners to deliver opportunistic multiple behaviour change counselling in primary care: a cluster randomised trial

TL;DR: Training primary care clinicians in behaviour change counselling did not increase patients reported beneficial behaviour change at three months or improve biometric and a biochemical measure at 12 months, but it did increase patients’ recollection of discussing behaviour change with their clinicians, intentions to change, attempts to changed, and perceptions of having made a lasting change atThree months.