scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The fourth edition of the Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes as mentioned in this paper has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.
Abstract
The purpose of economic evaluation is to inform decisions intended to improve healthcare. The new edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes equips the reader with the necessary tools and understanding required to undertake evaluations by providing an outline of key principles and a 'tool kit' based on the authors' own experiences of undertaking economic evaluations. Building on the strength of the previous edition, the accessible writing style ensures the text is key reading for the non-expert reader, as no prior knowledge of economics is required. The book employs a critical appraisal framework, which is useful both to researchers conducting studies and to decision-makers assessing them. Practical examples are provided throughout to aid learning and understanding. The book discusses the analytical and policy challenges that face health systems in seeking to allocate resources efficiently and fairly. New chapters include 'Principles of economic evaluation' and 'Making decisions in healthcare' which introduces the reader to core issues and questions about resource allocation, and provides an understanding of the fundamental principles which guide decision making. A key part of evidence-based decision making is the analysis of all the relevant evidence to make informed decisions and policy. The new chapter 'Identifying, synthesising and analysing evidence' highlights the importance of systematic review, and how and why these methods are used. As methods of analysis continue to develop, the chapter on 'Characterising, reporting and interpreting uncertainty' introduces the reader to recent methods of analysis and why characterizing uncertainty matters for health care decisions. The fourth edition of Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes has been thoroughly revised and updated, making it essential reading for anyone commissioning, undertaking, or using economic evaluations in health care, including health service professionals, health economists, and health care decision makers.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring preference anomalies in double bounded contingent valuation

TL;DR: The results of this study question the use of iterative valuation formats and suggest the incentives for truthful preference revelation are altered in the presence of a follow up question.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cost utility analysis of knee prosthesis with complete microprocessor control (C-leg) compared with mechanical technology in trans-femoral amputees

TL;DR: The study determines the cost–utility of a unilateral electronic knee prosthesis (C-leg) compared to mechanical alternatives in trans-femoral amputees and finds the two groups to have similar costs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Is stacking intervention components cost-effective? An analysis of the incredible years program

TL;DR: Stacking intervention components is likely cost-effective, at least for willingness to pay above $3,000 per child treated, according to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves.
Journal ArticleDOI

Value of hospital resources for effective pressure injury prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

TL;DR: The analysis using EHR data maintains that pressure-injury prevention for all inpatients is cost-effective, and hospitals should invest in nursing compliance with international prevention guidelines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods of international health technology assessment agencies for economic evaluations- a comparative analysis

TL;DR: An overview and comparison of the methodological recommendations of international HTA agencies for economic evaluations shows a considerable unexplainable variance in recommendations, and further effort is needed to harmonize methods for preparing economic evaluations.