scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors conducted a systematic review of the association between a single item assessing general self-rated health (GSRH) and mortality and found that persons with poor self-reported health had a 2-fold higher mortality risk compared with persons with "excellent" health status, even after adjustment for key covariates such as functional status, depression, and co-morbidity.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Health planners and policy makers are increasingly asking for a feasible method to identify vulnerable persons with the greatest health needs. We conducted a systematic review of the association between a single item assessing general self-rated health (GSRH) and mortality. DATA SOURCES: Systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE database searches for studies published from January 1966 to September 2003. REVIEW METHODS: Two investigators independently searched English language prospective, community-based cohort studies that reported (1) all-cause mortality, (2) a question assessing GSRH; and (3) an adjusted relative risk or equivalent. The investigators searched the citations to determine inclusion eligibility and abstracted data by following a standarized protocol. Of the 163 relevant studies identified, 22 cohorts met the inclusion criteria. Using a random effects model, compared with persons reporting “excellent” health status, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality was 1.23 [1.09, 1.39], 1.44 [1.21, 1.71], and 1.92 [1.64, 2.25] for those reporting “good,” “fair,” and “poor” health status, respectively. This relationship was robust in sensitivity analyses, limited to studies that adjusted for comorbid illness, functional status, cognitive status, and depression, and across subgroups defined by gender and country of origin. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with “poor” self-rated health had a 2-fold higher mortality risk compared with persons with “excellent” self-rated health. Subjects’ responses to a simple, single-item GSRH question maintained a strong association with mortality even after adjustment for key covariates such as functional status, depression, and co-morbidity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Surprise Question and Self-Rated Health Are Useful Screens for Frailty and Disability in Older Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease.

TL;DR: Subjective health measures may be useful screening tools for frailty and functional status in older adults with chronic kidney disease and their utility as screening tools is evaluated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Single item on patients’ satisfaction with condition provided additional insight into impact of surgery

TL;DR: In this article, the authors determine the value of a single item on patients' satisfaction with their condition for assessing outcome in four common surgical procedures, i.e., inguinal hernia, varicose veins, hip, and knee.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring the link between energy security and subjective well-being: a study of 22 nations

TL;DR: Worries about energy security reduce subjective well-being, suggesting another avenue through which energy relates to human health.
Journal ArticleDOI

Epidemiology of self-rated health in rural China: a population-based cross-sectional study.

TL;DR: Self-rated health (SRH) was measured in a population-based study of 2,814 adults aged 25 to 69 who were recruited from rural Anyang in 2014 and was positively correlated with medical history as well as high levels of fasting plasma glucose and total cholesterol, but not with unhealthy lifestyle indicators.
Journal ArticleDOI

Why Do Japan and South Korea Record Very Low Levels of Perceived Health Despite Having Very High Life Expectancies

TL;DR: Although good SRH is closely related to better LE at the individual level, this was not true at the national level, and frequent use of healthcare in Japan and Korea was strongly correlated with poorer SRH, without any meaningful correlation with LE.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials*

TL;DR: This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition and suggests a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-rated health and mortality : a review of twenty-seven community studies

TL;DR: This work examines the growing number of studies of survey respondents' global self-ratings of health as predictors of mortality in longitudinal studies of representative community samples and suggests several approaches to the next stage of research in this field.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly.

TL;DR: Empirical support is provided for the long held, but inadequately substantiated, belief that the way a person views his health is importantly related to subsequent health outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: The authors propose two methods that account for the correlations but require only the summary estimates and marginal data from the studies, which provide more efficient estimates of regression slope, more accurate variance estimates, and more valid heterogeneity tests than those previously available.
Related Papers (5)