scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health question. A meta-analysis.

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors conducted a systematic review of the association between a single item assessing general self-rated health (GSRH) and mortality and found that persons with poor self-reported health had a 2-fold higher mortality risk compared with persons with "excellent" health status, even after adjustment for key covariates such as functional status, depression, and co-morbidity.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Health planners and policy makers are increasingly asking for a feasible method to identify vulnerable persons with the greatest health needs. We conducted a systematic review of the association between a single item assessing general self-rated health (GSRH) and mortality. DATA SOURCES: Systematic MEDLINE and EMBASE database searches for studies published from January 1966 to September 2003. REVIEW METHODS: Two investigators independently searched English language prospective, community-based cohort studies that reported (1) all-cause mortality, (2) a question assessing GSRH; and (3) an adjusted relative risk or equivalent. The investigators searched the citations to determine inclusion eligibility and abstracted data by following a standarized protocol. Of the 163 relevant studies identified, 22 cohorts met the inclusion criteria. Using a random effects model, compared with persons reporting “excellent” health status, the relative risk (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality was 1.23 [1.09, 1.39], 1.44 [1.21, 1.71], and 1.92 [1.64, 2.25] for those reporting “good,” “fair,” and “poor” health status, respectively. This relationship was robust in sensitivity analyses, limited to studies that adjusted for comorbid illness, functional status, cognitive status, and depression, and across subgroups defined by gender and country of origin. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with “poor” self-rated health had a 2-fold higher mortality risk compared with persons with “excellent” self-rated health. Subjects’ responses to a simple, single-item GSRH question maintained a strong association with mortality even after adjustment for key covariates such as functional status, depression, and co-morbidity.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Health and Ageing

TL;DR: This chapter will provide an overview of the health profile of older people in Australia including analysis and discussion of epidemiological evidence of changes in the pattern of health-related issues and the challenges and opportunities these present.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-rated health: caught in the crossfire of the quest for ‘true’ health?

TL;DR: Mixed findings such as these could be taken as evidence that SRH is not a reliable measure of health for the study of social inequalities in health; instead, it is shown how differences provide fruitful insights for understanding how individuals assess their own health and thus point the way towards a need for more research designed to test these specific hypotheses.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prescription opioid use among adults with mental health disorders in the United States

TL;DR: The 16% of Americans who have mental health disorders receive over half of all opioids prescribed in the United States, and improving pain management among this population is critical to reduce national dependency on opioids.
Journal ArticleDOI

Health care expenditure prediction with a single item, self-rated health measure

TL;DR: A simple model of GSRH and age robustly stratifies populations and predicts future health expenditures generally as well as more complex models.
Journal ArticleDOI

What determines Self-Rated Health (SRH)? A cross-sectional study of SF-36 health domains in the EPIC-Norfolk cohort

TL;DR: It is confirmed that physical functioning is more strongly associated with SRH than mental health and social functioning, even where the relative associations between each dimension and SRH may be expected to differ, such as in those with depression.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

TL;DR: Funnel plots, plots of the trials' effect estimates against sample size, are skewed and asymmetrical in the presence of publication bias and other biases Funnel plot asymmetry, measured by regression analysis, predicts discordance of results when meta-analyses are compared with single large trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Meta-Analysis in Clinical Trials*

TL;DR: This paper examines eight published reviews each reporting results from several related trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of a certain treatment for a specified medical condition and suggests a simple noniterative procedure for characterizing the distribution of treatment effects in a series of studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-rated health and mortality : a review of twenty-seven community studies

TL;DR: This work examines the growing number of studies of survey respondents' global self-ratings of health as predictors of mortality in longitudinal studies of representative community samples and suggests several approaches to the next stage of research in this field.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-rated health: a predictor of mortality among the elderly.

TL;DR: Empirical support is provided for the long held, but inadequately substantiated, belief that the way a person views his health is importantly related to subsequent health outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI

Methods for Trend Estimation from Summarized Dose-Response Data, with Applications to Meta-Analysis

TL;DR: The authors propose two methods that account for the correlations but require only the summary estimates and marginal data from the studies, which provide more efficient estimates of regression slope, more accurate variance estimates, and more valid heterogeneity tests than those previously available.
Related Papers (5)