On the need for bias correction in regional climate scenarios to assess climate change impacts on river runoff
Markus Muerth,B. Gauvin St-Denis,Simon Ricard,J. A. Velázquez,Josef Schmid,M. Minville,Daniel Caya,Diane Chaumont,Ralf Ludwig,R. Turcotte +9 more
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors investigated the effect of bias correction on simulated runoff regimes and the relative change in selected runoff indicators using an ensemble of multiple climate and hydrological models.Abstract:
. In climate change impact research, the assessment of future river runoff as well as the catchment-scale water balance is impeded by different sources of modeling uncertainty. Some research has already been done in order to quantify the uncertainty of climate projections originating from the climate models and the downscaling techniques, as well as from the internal variability evaluated from climate model member ensembles. Yet, the use of hydrological models adds another layer of uncertainty. Within the QBic3 project (Quebec–Bavarian International Collaboration on Climate Change), the relative contributions to the overall uncertainty from the whole model chain (from global climate models to water management models) are investigated using an ensemble of multiple climate and hydrological models. Although there are many options to downscale global climate projections to the regional scale, recent impact studies tend to use regional climate models (RCMs). One reason for that is that the physical coherence between atmospheric and land-surface variables is preserved. The coherence between temperature and precipitation is of particular interest in hydrology. However, the regional climate model outputs often are biased compared to the observed climatology of a given region. Therefore, biases in those outputs are often corrected to facilitate the reproduction of historic runoff conditions when used in hydrological models, even if those corrections alter the relationship between temperature and precipitation. So, as bias correction may affect the consistency between RCM output variables, the use of correction techniques and even the use of (biased) climate model data itself is sometimes disputed among scientists. For these reasons, the effect of bias correction on simulated runoff regimes and the relative change in selected runoff indicators is explored. If it affects the conclusion of climate change analysis in hydrology, we should consider it as a source of uncertainty. If not, the application of bias correction methods is either unnecessary to obtain the change signal in hydro-climatic projections, or safe to use for the production of present and future river runoff scenarios as it does not alter the change signal. The results of the present paper highlight the analysis of daily runoff simulated with four different hydrological models in two natural-flow catchments, driven by different regional climate models for a reference and a future period. As expected, bias correction of climate model outputs is important for the reproduction of the runoff regime of the past, regardless of the hydrological model used. Then again, its impact on the relative change of flow indicators between reference and future periods is weak for most indicators, with the exception of the timing of the spring flood peak. Still, our results indicate that the impact of bias correction on runoff indicators increases with bias in the climate simulations.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Bias Correction of GCM Precipitation by Quantile Mapping: How Well Do Methods Preserve Changes in Quantiles and Extremes?
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the extent to which quantile mapping algorithms modify global climate model (GCM) trends in mean precipitation and precipitation extremes indices, and proposed a bias correction algorithm, quantile delta mapping (QDM), that explicitly preserves relative changes in precipitation quantiles.
Journal ArticleDOI
Global projections of river flood risk in a warmer world
Lorenzo Alfieri,Berny Bisselink,Francesco Dottori,Gustavo Naumann,Ad de Roo,Peter Salamon,Klaus Wyser,Luc Feyen +7 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a framework to estimate the economic damage and population affected by river floods at global scale based on a modeling cascade involving hydrological, hydraulic and socioeconomic impact simulations, and makes use of state-of-the-art global layers of hazard, exposure and vulnerability at 1-km grid resolution.
A Meteorological Distribution System for High Resolution Terrestrial Modeling (MicroMet)
Glen E. Liston,Kelly Elder +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, an intermediate-complexity, quasi-physically based, meteorological model (MicroMet) is developed to produce high-resolution (e.g., 30-m to 1-km horizontal grid increment) atmospheric forcings required to run spatially distributed terrestrial models over a wide variety of landscapes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Global warming increases the frequency of river floods in Europe
TL;DR: In this paper, an ensemble of RCP8.5 scenarios is used to drive a distributed hydrological model and assess the projected changes in flood hazard in Europe through the current century.
Journal ArticleDOI
Is bias correction of regional climate model (RCM) simulations possible for non-stationary conditions?
TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluate how well correction methods perform for conditions different from those used for calibration with the relatively simple differential split-sample test, and recommend using higher-skill correction methods such as distribution mapping.
References
More filters
Book ChapterDOI
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
TL;DR: The comparison of two treatments generally falls into one of the following two categories: (a) a number of replications for each of the two treatments, which are unpaired, or (b) we may have a series of paired comparisons, some of which may be positive and some negative as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions
Ed Hawkins,Rowan Sutton +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, a suite of climate models are used to predict changes in surface air temperature on decadal timescales and regional spatial scales, and it is shown that the uncertainty for the next few decades is dominated by model uncertainty and internal variability that are potentially reducible through progress in climate science.
Journal ArticleDOI
Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling
TL;DR: There is a need for a move away from comparison studies into the provision of decision-making tools for planning and management that are robust to future uncertainties; with examination and understanding of uncertainties within the modelling system.
Journal ArticleDOI
Hydrologic Implications of Dynamical and Statistical Approaches to Downscaling Climate Model Outputs
TL;DR: In this article, six approaches for downscaling climate model outputs for use in hydrologic simulation were evaluated, with particular emphasis on each method's ability to produce precipitation and other variables used to drive a macro-scale hydrology model applied at much higher spatial resolution than the climate model.
Journal ArticleDOI
Precipitation downscaling under climate change: Recent developments to bridge the gap between dynamical models and the end user
Douglas Maraun,Douglas Maraun,Fredrik Wetterhall,Andrew Ireson,Richard E. Chandler,Elizabeth J. Kendon,Martin Widmann,S. Brienen,S. Brienen,Henning W. Rust,Tobias Sauter,M. Themeßl,Victor Venema,Kwok Pan Chun,Clare Goodess,Richard G. Jones,Christian Onof,Mathieu Vrac,I. Thiele-Eich +18 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors integrate perspectives from meteorologists, climatologists, statisticians, and hydrologists to identify generic end user (in particular, impact modeler) needs and to discuss downscaling capabilities and gaps.