scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Organizational- and system-level characteristics that influence implementation of shared decision-making and strategies to address them — a scoping review

TLDR
Although infrequently studied, organizational- and system-level characteristics appear to play a role in the failure to implement SDM in routine care.
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is poorly implemented in routine care, despite being promoted by health policies. No reviews have solely focused on an in-depth synthesis of the literature around organizational- and system-level characteristics (i.e., characteristics of healthcare organizations and of healthcare systems) that may affect SDM implementation. A synthesis would allow exploration of interventions to address these characteristics. The study aim was to compile a comprehensive overview of organizational- and system-level characteristics that are likely to influence the implementation of SDM, and to describe strategies to address those characteristics described in the literature. We conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O’Malley framework. The search strategy included an electronic search and a secondary search including gray literature. We included publications reporting on projects that promoted implementation of SDM or other decision support interventions in routine healthcare. We screened titles and abstracts, and assessed full texts for eligibility. We used qualitative thematic analysis to identify organizational- and system-level characteristics. After screening 7745 records and assessing 354 full texts for eligibility, 48 publications on 32 distinct implementation projects were included. Most projects (N = 22) were conducted in the USA. Several organizational-level characteristics were described as influencing the implementation of SDM, including organizational leadership, culture, resources, and priorities, as well as teams and workflows. Described system-level characteristics included policies, clinical guidelines, incentives, culture, education, and licensing. We identified potential strategies to influence the described characteristics, e.g., examples how to facilitate distribution of decision aids in a healthcare institution. Although infrequently studied, organizational- and system-level characteristics appear to play a role in the failure to implement SDM in routine care. A wide range of characteristics described as supporting and inhibiting implementation were identified. Future studies should assess the impact of these characteristics on SDM implementation more thoroughly, quantify likely interactions, and assess how characteristics might operate across types of systems and areas of healthcare. Organizations that wish to support the adoption of SDM should carefully consider the role of organizational- and system-level characteristics. Implementation and organizational theory could provide useful guidance for how to address facilitators and barriers to change.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Posted Content

Shared Decision-making in the Medical Encounter: What Does It Mean? (Or, It Takes at Least Two to Tango)

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide greater conceptual clarity about shared treatment decision-making, identify some key characteristics of this model, and discuss measurement issues, as well as potential benefits of a shared decision making model for both physicians and patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and facilitators of pediatric shared decision-making: a systematic review

TL;DR: Numerous diverse and interrelated factors influence SDM use in pediatric clinical practice and can be used to identify potential pediatric SDM barriers and facilitators, guide context-specific barrier and facilitator assessments, and inform interventions for implementing SDM in pediatric practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Implementation of patient-centred care: which organisational determinants matter from decision maker’s perspective? Results from a qualitative interview study across various health and social care organisations

TL;DR: Several determinants at the HSCO’s inner setting and the individual level were identified as crucial to overcome constrained financial, human and material resources in order to deliver patient-centred care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making in hospitals from policy to practice: a systematic review.

TL;DR: In this paper, a systematic review aimed to review literature exploring barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making (SDM) in hospital settings from multiple stakeholder perspectives, focusing on peer-reviewed qualitative studies with the primary aim of identifying barriers and facilitating to implementing SDM in hospital (tertiary care) settings.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis

TL;DR: The authors delineate analytic procedures specific to each approach and techniques addressing trustworthiness with hypothetical examples drawn from the area of end-of-life care.
Journal ArticleDOI

Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

TL;DR: A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.
Journal ArticleDOI

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science

TL;DR: The CFIR provides a pragmatic structure for approaching complex, interacting, multi-level, and transient states of constructs in the real world by embracing, consolidating, and unifying key constructs from published implementation theories.
Journal ArticleDOI

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

TL;DR: Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework, to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations

TL;DR: A parsimonious and evidence-based model for considering the diffusion of innovations in health service organizations, clear knowledge gaps where further research should be focused, and a robust and transferable methodology for systematically reviewing health service policy and management are discussed.
Related Papers (5)