scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: the role of attachment anxiety.

TLDR
Perceptions of daily relationship-based conflicts negatively impacted the perceived satisfaction/closeness and relationship futures of highly anxious individuals, whereas perceptions of greater daily support had positive effects.
Abstract
Guided by attachment theory, a 2-part study was conducted to test how perceptions of relationship-based conflict and support are associated with relationship satisfaction/closeness and future quality. Dating partners completed diaries for 14 days (Part 1) and then were videotaped while discussing a major problem that occurred during the diary study (Part 2). Part 1 reveals that more anxiously attached individuals perceived more conflict with their dating partners and reported a tendency for conflicts to escalate in severity. Perceptions of daily relationship-based conflicts negatively impacted the perceived satisfaction/closeness and relationship futures of highly anxious individuals, whereas perceptions of greater daily support had positive effects. Part 2 reveals that highly anxious individuals appeared more distressed and escalated the severity of conflicts (rated by observers) and reported feeling more distressed. The authors discuss the unique features of attachment anxiety and how changing perceptions of relationship satisfaction/closeness and stability could erode commitment over time. Romantic relationships sometimes seem similar to roller coaster rides in which partners experience breathtaking emotional highs rapidly followed by heartbreaking lows. For many people, these countervailing moments of joy and despair are experienced infrequently and mainly in stressful situations. For some individuals, however, these roller coaster episodes occur on a regular basis during everyday interactions with their romantic partners. Recent research indicates that perceptions of daily relationship events strongly color how individuals construe their romantic partners’ underlying motives and intentions and that these construals can

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Optimizing Assurance: The Risk Regulation System in Relationships.

TL;DR: A model of risk regulation is proposed to explain how people balance the goal of seeking closeness to a romantic partner against the opposing goal of minimizing the likelihood and pain of rejection.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Adult Attachment Interview and Self-Reports of Attachment Style: An Empirical Rapprochement

TL;DR: This report was designed as a rapprochement of the AAI and attachment style literatures and includes 3 studies that shows that developmental and social psychological measures of attachment security predict somewhat distinct--though theoretically anticipated--aspects of functioning in adult relationships.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies.

TL;DR: It is argued that sex differences in attachment emerge in middle childhood, have adaptive significance in both children and adults, and are part of sex-specific life history strategies, thus contributing to a coherent evolutionary theory of human development.
Journal ArticleDOI

Trust, conflict, and cooperation: a meta-analysis.

TL;DR: The results support an emerging consensus about trust being limited to situations of conflict and address some theoretical and societal implications for the understanding of how and why trust is so important to social interactions and relationships.
Journal ArticleDOI

Adult attachment, sexual satisfaction, and relationship satisfaction: A study of married couples

TL;DR: This article found that participants with higher levels of anxiety and avoidance reported lower levels of sexual satisfaction at the individual level, and that the relationship between sexual and marital satisfaction was stronger for more anxious individuals and those with more attached spouses.
References
More filters
Book

Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods

TL;DR: The Logic of Hierarchical Linear Models (LMLM) as discussed by the authors is a general framework for estimating and hypothesis testing for hierarchical linear models, and it has been used in many applications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods.

TL;DR: This chapter discusses Hierarchical Linear Models in Applications, Applications in Organizational Research, and Applications in the Study of Individual Change Applications in Meta-Analysis and Other Cases Where Level-1 Variances are Known.
Book

Attachment and Loss

John Bowlby
Journal ArticleDOI

Society and the Adolescent Self-Image

D. J. Lee
- 01 May 1969 -