scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Primary Invagination of the Vegetal Plate During Sea Urchin Gastrulation

Charles A. Ettensohn
- 01 Aug 1984 - 
- Vol. 24, Iss: 3, pp 571-588
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Examination of L. pictus and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus gastrulae by transmission electron microscopy reveals that cells in the wall of the archenteron continue to be joined by typical junctional complexes during primary invagination, and the morphology of the junctional complex at the gastrula stage is more elaborate than previously described.
Abstract
The initial phase of echinoid gastrulation, primary invagination, involves an inpocketing of a monolayered epithelium. To gain information about the nature of the mechanical forces that are responsible for primary invagination, several experimental approaches have been taken, using the transparent embryos of the sea urchin, Lytechinus pictus , as the principal material. Vegetal plates isolated microsurgically well before the onset of gastrulation will invaginate normally, demonstrating that the forces responsible for primary invagination are generated by the cells in the vegetal ⅓ to ½ of the embryo. As shown by serial reconstructions of L. pictus embryos, relatively few cells (about 100) take part in primary invagination. Both the number of cells and the total volume of tissue in the wall of the archenteron increase with time. Even so, it can be shown that very little movement of cells over the lip of the blastopore takes place during primary invagination, and this process is best viewed as a simple inpocketing of the vegetal epithelium. The cells in the wall of the archenteron have a distinctive shape; they are elongated along their apico-basal axes and frequently have enlarged, rounded, basal ends. However, they do not undergo any dramatic changes in shape during primary invagination. In particular, there is only a slight decrease in the height of the cells (length along the apico-basal axis), a result that is inconsistent with the hypothesis that invagination is due to cell rounding (Gustafson and Wolpert, 1967). Examination of L. pictus and Strongylocentrotus purpuratus gastrulae by transmission electron microscopy reveals that cells in the wall of the archenteron continue to be joined by typical junctional complexes during primary invagination. In addition, the morphology of the junctional complex at the gastrula stage is more elaborate than previously described. Sparse bands of micronlaments are associated with the plasma membrane at the level of the junctional complexes in both endodermal and ectodermal cells. These and other relevant data on early echinoid gastrulation are discussed in relation to several possible mechanisms of epithelial morphogenesis.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

How we are shaped: the biomechanics of gastrulation.

TL;DR: What is known of the biomechanics of gastrulation is discussed, primarily in amphibians but also comparing similar morphogenic processes in teleost fish and amniotes, and selected events in several species invertebrates.
Journal ArticleDOI

Apical constriction: a cell shape change that can drive morphogenesis.

TL;DR: The diversity of mechanisms of apical constriction, the diversity of roles that apical Constriction plays in development, and the common themes that emerge from comparing systems are reviewed.
Journal ArticleDOI

How do sea urchins invaginate? Using biomechanics to distinguish between mechanisms of primary invagination

TL;DR: A set of finite element simulations that test five hypothesized mechanisms that show that each of these mechanisms can generate an invagination, however, the mechanical properties of an epithelial sheet required for proper Invagination are different for each mechanism.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Junctional complexes in various epithelia

TL;DR: The tight junction is impervious to concentrated protein solutions and appears to function as a diffusion barrier or "seal," and the desmosome and probably also the zonula adhaerens may represent intercellular attachment devices.
Journal ArticleDOI

The mechanical basis of morphogenesis. I. Epithelial folding and invagination.

TL;DR: The objective of this paper is to demonstrate that the model, based on the local behavior of individual cells, generates a propagating contraction wave which is sufficient to explain the globally coherent morphogenetic infolding of a wide variety of embryonic epithelia.
Journal ArticleDOI

An ultrastructural analysis of the developing embryonic pancreas

TL;DR: The morphological observations of this study are consistent with the previously proposed biphasic model of differentiation for the exocrine and endocrine B cells, and the development of specific organelles correlates with the pattern of accumulation of the specific exocrine proteins and insulin.
Journal ArticleDOI

Cellular movement and contact in sea urchin morphogenesis

TL;DR: Morphogenesis of the mesenchyme, skeleton and archenteron, and the basis of its pattern, and changes in shape of the blastula and the gastrula ectoderm.
Journal ArticleDOI

The mechanics of sea urchin development, studied by operative methods

TL;DR: In the cleavage stages the sea urchin's egg can be divided into five transverse layers, an1, an2, veg1, veG2, and the micromeres, where the micromere material migrates into the blastocoele before gastrulation, forming the primary mesenchyme, which produces the skeletal rods.
Related Papers (5)