Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles
read more
Citations
The Moral Machine experiment
What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment
Public Acceptance of Fully Automated Driving: Effects of Social Trust and Risk/Benefit Perceptions
Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS)
Willingness to pay for self-driving vehicles: Influences of demographic and psychological factors
References
Related Papers (5)
Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations
Investigating the Importance of Trust on Adopting an Autonomous Vehicle
Frequently Asked Questions (17)
Q2. What is the role of trust in AVs?
For AVs, which will need to navigate their complex urban environment with the power of life and death, trust will determine how widely they are adopted by consumers, and how tolerated they are by everyone else.
Q3. What are the main reasons why people are reluctant to use a car?
In handling these situations, the cars may operate as utilitarians, minimizing total risk to people regardless of who they are, or as self-protective, placing extra weight on the safety of their own passengers.
Q4. What is the effect of a large media coverage of a crash involving an AV?
Outsized media coverage of crashes involving AVs may feed and amplify people's fears by tapping into the availability heuristic (risks are subjectively higher when they come to mind easily) and affective heuristic (risks are perceived to be higher when they evoke a vivid emotional reaction).
Q5. What is the relevant example of successful virtue consumerism?
The most relevant example of successful virtue consumerism is that of the Toyota Prius, a hybrid-electric automobile whose distinctive shape has allowed owners to signal their environmental commitment.
Q6. What is the main reason why AVs are so complex?
AV intelligence is driven in part by machine learning, in which computers learn increasingly sophisticated patterns without being explicitly taught.
Q7. What is the role of AVs in the public debate?
AV spokespeople should prepare the public for the inevitability of accidents—not overpromising infallibility, but still emphasizing AVs'safety advantages over human drivers.
Q8. What are the main challenges of the integration of autonomous cars?
Many challenges remain— hacking, liability, and labour displacement issues, most significantly— but this social contract will be bound as much by psychological realities as by technological and legal ones.
Q9. What is the history of autonomous cars?
In this time, a system of laws regulating the behaviour of drivers and pedestrians, and the designs and practices of manufacturers, has been introduced and continuously refined.
Q10. What are the biggest roadblocks to the mass adoption of autonomous vehicles?
But the biggest roadblocks standing in the path of the mass adoption may be psychological, not technological; 78% of Americans report fearing riding in an AV, with only 19% indicating they would trust the car1.
Q11. What could derail the adoption of AVs?
These reactions could derail the adoption of AVs through numerous paths; it could directly deter consumers, it could provoke politicians to enact suffocating restrictions, or it could create outsized liability issues—fuelled by court and jury overreactions—that compromise the financial feasibility of AVs.
Q12. What are the main points of the article?
Self-driving cars offer a bright future, but only if the public can overcome the psychological challenges that stand in the way of widespread adoption.
Q13. What is the effect of the media coverage of AV accidents?
As with airplane crashes, the more disproportionate—and disproportionately sensational—the coverage that AV accidents receive, the more exaggerated people will perceive the risk and dangers of these cars in comparison to those of traditional human-driven ones.
Q14. What are the three main obstacles to the widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles?
These begin with the need for an AV to decide how it will operate in situations where its actions could decrease the risk of harming its own passengers by increasing the risk to a potentially larger number of nonpassengers (e.g. pedestrians, other drivers).
Q15. What is the effect of algorithm aversion on AVs?
for AVs these reactions may be compounded by algorithm aversion6, the tendency for people to more rapidly lose faith in an erring decision-making algorithm than in humans making comparable errors.
Q16. What are the psychological challenges to AVs?
Psychological Challenge Suggested ActionsThe Dilemmas of Autonomous Ethics People are torn between how they want AVs to ethically behave; they morally believe the vehicles should operate under utilitarian principles, but prefer to buy vehicles that prioritize their own lives as passengers.
Q17. What is the way to educate the public about the risks of AVs?
Instead they should educate the public about the actual risks and, if moved to act, do so in a calculated way, perhaps by offering the public “fear placebos” 8—high-visibility, low-cost gestures that do the most to assuage the publics’ fears without undermining the real benefits that AVs might bring.