scispace - formally typeset
Open Access

Pupils' needs for conviction and explanation within the context of dynamic geometry.

TLDR
The research attempted to determine whether pupils were convinced about explored geometric statements and their level of conviction, and established whether pupils exhibited an independent desire for why the result, they obtained, is true, within the context of dynamic geometry.
Abstract
Recent literature on mathematics education, and more especially on the teaching and learning of geometry, indicates a need for further investigations into the possibility of devising new strategies, or even developing present methods, in order to avert what might seem to be a "problem" in mathematics education. Most educators hIld textbooks, it would seem, do not address the need (function and meaning) of proof at all, or those that do, only address it from the limited perspective that the only function of proof is verification. The theoretical part of this study, therefore, analyzed the various functions of proof: in order to identify possible alternate ways of presenting proof meaningfully to pupils. This work further attempted to build on existing research and tested these ideas in a teaching environment. This was done in order to evaluate the feasibility of introducing "proof' as a means of explanation rather than only verification, within the context of dynamic geometry. Pupils, who had not been exposed to proof as yet, were interviewed and their responses were analyzed. The research focused on a few aspects. It attempted to determine whether pupils were convinced about explored geometric statements and their level of conviction. It also attempted to establish whether pupils exhibited an independent desire for why the result, they obtained, is true and if they did, could they construct an explanation, albeit a guided one, on their own. Several useful implications have evolved from this work and may be able to influence, both the teaching and learning, of geometry in school. Perhaps the suggestions may be useful to pre-service and in-service educators.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Thinking with diagrams whilst writing with words

TL;DR: An important finding of the research reported here is the ease with which dynamic geometry software can be used as a visual tool to develop analogical reasoning skills.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Relationship between Pre-service Teachers' Geometric Reasoning and their van Hiele Levels in a Geometer's Sketchpad Environment

TL;DR: This article investigated how pre-service teachers proved three geometric problems by using Geometer's SketchPad (GSP) software and found that the ways the PSTs justified their geometric reasoning across the three questions demonstrated their different uses of GSP depending on their van Hiele levels.
Journal Article

When Proofs Reflect More on Assumptions than Conclusions.

TL;DR: For the Learning of Mathematics 34, 2 (July, 2014) FLM Publishing Association, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada “Mathematics is growing at the bottom as well as at the top” (Young, Denton & Mitchell, 1911, p. 7) as discussed by the authors reflects the need to engage advanced students in formalizing and systematizing mathematics, in the sense of identifying assumptions that underlie the mathematics they learn.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Mathematical Experience.

TL;DR: This edition of the book should find a new generation of general readers and students who would like to know what mathematics is all about and will prove invaluable as a course text for a general mathematics appreciation course, one in which the student can combine an appreciation for the esthetics with some satisfying and revealing applications.
Journal ArticleDOI

Proving Is Convincing and Explaining.

TL;DR: In mathematical research, the purpose of proof is to convince as discussed by the authors, and the test of whether something is a proof is whether it convinces qualified judges. In the classroom, on the other hand, it is to explain.
Journal ArticleDOI

A study of pupils' proof-explanations in mathematical situations

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyse pupils' attempts to construct proofs and explanations in simple mathematical situations, to observe in what ways they differ from the mature mathematician's use of proof, and derive guidance about how best to foster pupils' development in this area.