scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Quality in Interpretive Engineering Education Research: Reflections on an Example Study

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors present reflections on challenges to research quality in an example interpretive engineering education study, and offer a quality framework that emerged from this study as a coherent, discipline-specific view on interpretive research quality.
Abstract
Background The emerging discipline of engineering education research is increasingly embracing a diverse range of interpretive research methods, whose adoption is characterized by a lack of coherent ways to conceptualize, communicate, and judge the quality of interpretive inquiries. Yet fields that have traditionally employed these methods do not offer a consensus about research quality. Purpose This article presents reflections on challenges to research quality in an example interpretive engineering education study, and offers a quality framework that emerged from this study as a coherent, discipline-specific view on interpretive research quality. Design/Method Analysis of the prior study of engineering students' competency formation by the author(s) is combined with a synthesis of the literature from the broad intellectual traditions of the interpretive paradigm to inform the development of a theoretical framework of research quality. Results Drawing on the engineering metaphor of quality management, we propose a systematic, process-oriented framework of research quality along two dimensions: a process model locates quality strategies throughout the research process, and a typology systemizes fundamental aspects of validation (theoretical, procedural, communicative, and pragmatic) and the concept of process reliability to explicate quality strategies in their fundamental contribution to substantiating knowledge claims. Conclusion The quality framework provides a way to develop and demonstrate overall research quality in the interpretive inquiry by shifting attention away from assessing the research quality of a final product. Rather, the framework provides guidance to systematically document and explicitly demonstrate quality considerations throughout the entire research process.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Voices from the workplace: practitioners’ perspectives on the role of empathy and care within engineering

TL;DR: In this article, the authors collected and thematically analyzed semi-structured interviews with 25 practicing engineers to understand how they conceptualized empathy and care and in what ways they perceived empathy to exist within or be important to engineering practice.

Exploring Ethical Validation as a Key Consideration in Interpretive Research Quality

TL;DR: The authors propose ethical validation as a validation construct that, they argue, lies at the heart of conducting and evaluating interpretive research, specifically concerned with the human experience of the researcher and the researched throughout the inquiry.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Power and Politics of Engineering Education Research Design: Saving the ‘Small N’

TL;DR: For decades, American researchers have brought intellectual, financial and labor resources to understand minority underrepresentation in engineering, including through studies of persistent race discrimination in the engineering field as discussed by the authors.
References
More filters
Book

Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research

TL;DR: The Discovery of Grounded Theory as mentioned in this paper is a book about the discovery of grounded theories from data, both substantive and formal, which is a major task confronting sociologists and is understandable to both experts and laymen.
Book

Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook

TL;DR: This book presents a step-by-step guide to making the research results presented in reports, slideshows, posters, and data visualizations more interesting, and describes how coding initiates qualitative data analysis.
Book

Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions.

TL;DR: Creswell as mentioned in this paper explores the philosophical underpinnings, history and key elements of five qualitative inquiry traditions: biography, phenomenology, grounded theory, ethnography and case study.
Related Papers (5)