scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Scale, Security, and Political Economy: Debating the Biopolitics of the Global War on Terror1

Nicholas Kiersey
- 25 Mar 2009 - 
- Vol. 31, Iss: 1, pp 27-47
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
For instance, the authors suggests that Foucault attributed to governmentality an explicit impulse toward economic globalization and pointed out the importance of developments in the discourses of political economy for the emergence of modern governmental relations.
Abstract
Critical scholarship in Political Science and International Relations (IR) theory is turning increasingly to Michel Foucault's writings on governmentality and biopolitics to explore the complex discursive interdependencies between transnational governance and the War on Terror. Marxist critics have assailed this effort recently, however, for its premature assumption that the practices of governmental power can simply be “scaled” without the interventions of specific state-imperial powers. Yet both sides in this “debate about biopolitics” seem to rest their arguments on readings of Foucault which ignore his views on the importance of developments in the discourses of political economy for the emergence of modern governmental relations. Inspired by Foucault's recently published lectures on importance of the concept of “economic man” for neoliberal governmentality in particular, this article suggests that Foucault attributed to governmentality an explicit impulse toward economic globalization. Moreover, base...

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Sexy warriors: the politics and pleasures of submission to the state

TL;DR: The authors examined the relationship between sexuality, sexiness, and militarized bodies and argued that communities that eroticize these roles have broadly applicable insights into the productivity of power, and demonstrated how to think critically about the relationships between gender, war, desire, and agency.
Journal ArticleDOI

Neoliberal Political Economy and the Subjectivity of Crisis: Why Governmentality is Not Hollow

Nicholas Kiersey
- 09 Oct 2009 - 
TL;DR: The authors revisited Foucault's understanding of the importance of subjectivity for politics, focusing in particular on his claims concerning the sorts of demands placed on the subject by contemporary capitalism.
Journal ArticleDOI

International Biopolitics: Foucault, Globalisation and Imperialism

TL;DR: The authors argue that analysis of the contemporary international through the lens of Foucauldian biopolitics in fact shows us that our world system is marked by a parasitic imperialism of rich sovereign states over poor ones, carried on at the level of populations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Security (studies) and the limits of critique: why we should think through struggle

TL;DR: In this article, the political and epistemological stakes of knowledge production in post-structuralist Critical Security Studies are discussed. But, despite attempts to gain distance from the word ‘security, through interrogation of wider practices and schemes of knowledge in which security practices are embedded, post-Structuralist CSS too quickly reads security logics as determinative of modern/liberal forms of power and rule.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bodies to the Slaughter: Global Racial Reconstructions, Fanon's Combat Breath, and Wrestling for Life

TL;DR: In this article, Fanon's "combat breathing" and his critique of necropolitics and Montag's necroeconomics have been examined in the context of post-war and post-financial reconstructions.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

State of Exception

Journal ArticleDOI

Harper's magazine

Lucy Heckman
- 01 Mar 1981 - 
Book Chapter

Liberalism - what's in a name?

TL;DR: The second part of the title What's in a Name? as mentioned in this paper is taken from a moment in the balcony scene of Romeo and Juliet when Juliet briefly imagines that Romeo could be separated from his name, that he could be appreciated for what he is rather than for what his is called: ‘Tis but thy name’, she laments, ‘that is my enemy; Thou art thyself, though not a Montague’.