scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Sensor properties of a robust giant magnetoresistance material system at elevated temperatures

TLDR
In this article, the temperature dependence of the giant magnetoresistance (GMR) ratio, resistance and exchange-biasing field for a spin valve comprising an Ir19Mn81-biased artificial antiferromagnet (AAF) has been studied up to 325°C.
Abstract
The temperature dependence of the giant magnetoresistance (GMR) ratio, resistance and exchange-biasing field for a spin valve comprising an Ir19Mn81-biased artificial antiferromagnet (AAF) has been studied up to 325 °C. Up to 200–250 °C the temperature effects are reversible, at higher temperatures gradual irreversible changes are observed, probably due to atomic diffusion. The magnetoresistance effect is even at 200 °C still higher than for anisotropic magnetoresistance sensors at room temperature. The resistance of the multilayer shows a maximum around 250 °C. We found that this is due to the peculiar behavior of Ir–Mn, which has a negative temperature coefficient of the resistance. This provides a possibility to tune the temperature coefficient for the complete multilayer by varying the thickness of the Ir–Mn layer. The relative decrease of the exchange-biasing field as a function of temperature is much smaller for spin valves with AAF than for conventional spin valves (without AAF). Furthermore, it wa...

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Sensor properties of a robust giant magnetoresistance
material system at elevated temperatures
Citation for published version (APA):
Lenssen, K. M. H., Kuiper, A. E. T., Broek, van den, J. J., Rijt, van der, R. A. F., & Loon, van, A. M. (2000).
Sensor properties of a robust giant magnetoresistance material system at elevated temperatures.
Journal of
Applied Physics
,
87
(9), 6665-6667. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.372804
DOI:
10.1063/1.372804
Document status and date:
Published: 01/01/2000
Document Version:
Publisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Please check the document version of this publication:
• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be
important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People
interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the
DOI to the publisher's website.
• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.
• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page
numbers.
Link to publication
General rights
Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners
and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.
• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain
• You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal.
If the publication is distributed under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license above, please
follow below link for the End User Agreement:
www.tue.nl/taverne
Take down policy
If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at:
openaccess@tue.nl
providing details and we will investigate your claim.
Download date: 09. Aug. 2022

Sensor properties of a robust giant magnetoresistance material system
at elevated temperatures
K.-M. H. Lenssen,
a)
A. E. T. Kuiper, J. J. van den Broek, and R. A. F. van der Rijt
Philips Research Laboratories, Prof. Holstlaan 4, NL-5656 AA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
A. van Loon
Eindhoven University of Technology, Applied Physics Department, P.O. Box 513, NL-5600 MB Eindhoven,
The Netherlands
The temperature dependence of the giant magnetoresistance GMR ratio, resistance and
exchange-biasing field for a spin valve comprising an Ir
19
Mn
81
-biased artificial antiferromagnet
AAF has been studied up to 325 °C. Up to 200250 °C the temperature effects are reversible, at
higher temperatures gradual irreversible changes are observed, probably due to atomic diffusion.
The magnetoresistance effect is even at 200 °C still higher than for anisotropic magnetoresistance
sensors at room temperature. The resistance of the multilayer shows a maximum around 250°C. We
found that this is due to the peculiar behavior of IrMn, which has a negative temperature
coefficient of the resistance. This provides a possibility to tune the temperature coefficient for the
complete multilayer by varying the thickness of the IrMn layer. The relative decrease of the
exchange-biasing field as a function of temperature is much smaller for spin valves with AAF than
for conventional spin valves without AAF. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the GMR ratio
can be increased to 12% at room temperature by using a dual spin valve with two AAFs. © 2000
American Institute of Physics. S0021-89790049008-0
I. INTRODUCTION
Automotive and industrial sensor applications pose very
stringent requirements on giant magnetoresistance GMR
materials. The output signal should meet the specifications
over a wide field range up to several tens of kiloamperes per
meter and temperature range up to 175 °C. More than is
the case for recording applications, the GMR properties at
elevated temperatures are very important.
Therefore, we have studied the sensor properties of our
GMR material system not only after heating, but also at high
temperatures up to 325 °C. This multilayer is based on a
CoFe/Ru/CoFe artificial antiferromagnet AAF that is
exchange biased with IrMn.
1,2
This material typically
shows a GMR effect of 7% at room temperature. Recently
we have even obtained a GMR ratio of 12% in a dual spin
valve see Fig. 1; this is one of the highest values reported
so far for a spin valve comprising an AAF compare, for
example, Ref. 3.
In this article we will discuss the investigations of the
characteristics of single spin valves with exchange-biased
AAF at elevated temperatures.
II. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP
All samples were grown at room temperature by dc mag-
netron sputtering base pressure 10
8
mbar. As substrates
4 12 mm
2
Si100 crystals were used, as well as similar
substrates with 0.5-
m-thick thermal oxide. During deposi-
tion, a field of 20 kA/m was applied along the long axis of
the substrates.
The magnetoresistance of the spin valves was measured
in a four-terminal configuration current and field both along
the long axis, in which the temperature of the film in a
nitrogen atmosphere could be varied between room tem-
perature and 325 °C. In this study the time period that the
film was exposed to elevated temperatures during a magne-
toresistance measurement was circa 1.5 h including a delay
of 0.5 h before the start of the measurement for temperature
stabilization.
The four-point measurements of the sheet resistance
R
sheet
as a function of temperature were carried out in a dedi-
cated setup, in which the film was heated in vacuum
( 10
6
mbar). From these experiments the temperature co-
efficient of the resistance defined as
R/T
/R(25°C)
can be determined.
The studied films consist of: 3.5 nm Ta/2 nm Ni
80
Fe
20
/10
nm Ir
19
Mn
81
/4.5 nm Co
90
Fe
10
/0.8 nm Ru/4 nm Co
90
Fe
10
/
a
Electronic mail: lenssen@natlab.research.philips.com
FIG. 1. Magnetoresistance curve of a dual spin valve with AAFs, consisting
of 3.5 nm Ta/2 nm Ni
80
Fe
20
/6 nm Ir
19
Mn
81
/4 nm Co
90
Fe
10
/0.8 nm Ru/4nm
Co
90
Fe
10
/2.5 nm Cu/1.6nm Co
90
Fe
10
/2.5 nm Cu/4nm Co
90
Fe
10
/0.8 nm Ru/
4nm Co
90
Fe
10
/6 nm Ir
19
Mn
81
/3.5 nm Ta.
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS VOLUME 87, NUMBER 9 1 MAY 2000
66650021-8979/2000/87(9)/6665/3/$17.00 © 2000 American Institute of Physics
Downloaded 09 Oct 2009 to 131.155.151.77. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp

t
Cu
Cu/0.8 nm Co
90
Fe
10
/5 nm Ni
80
Fe
20
/4 nm Ta, with t
Cu
1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, and 5.0 nm. For comparison, some
conventional exchange-biased spin valves containing the
same materials have also been measured. Their composition
was 3.5 nm Ta/2 nm Ni
80
Fe
20
/10 nm Ir
19
Mn
81
/4 nm
Co
90
Fe
10
/t
Cu
Cu/0.8 nm Co
90
Fe
10
/5 nm Ni
80
Fe
20
/4 nm Ta, in
which the thickness of the Cu spacer was 2.5 or 3.5 nm.
Already as deposited the films showed exchange biasing.
III. TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE
A. GMR ratio
The magnetoresistance curves at different temperatures
up to 250 °C are shown in Fig. 2 for the multilayer contain-
ing 3.0 nm Cu. It can be seen that the typical shape of the
curves remains similar for all temperatures, which is prom-
ising for application in sensors. The GMR ratio R/R
sat
with R
sat
the saturation resistance, which is assumed to be
equal to the lowest measured resistance only decreases by
about half of its value when heated up to 200 °C. Note that
the remaining effect of 3% is still larger than the aniso-
tropic magnetoresistance AMR effect at room temperature.
So this opens possibilities for a magnetic sensor that could
work up to 200 °C or higher.
The temperature dependence of the GMR ratio is shown
in Fig. 3. Over a large temperature range the GMR ratio
decreases approximately linearly. Just below 290 °C i.e., the
blocking temperature of our IrMn films
4
it drops to a low
value. Despite the absence of exchange biasing above this
temperature, there is still a small GMR effect left up to
350 °C. This is attributed to the different coercivities of the
AAF and the free layer. At these high temperatures the mag-
netoresistance curves become symmetric around zero field
like in so-called hard-soft multilayers. The dependence of
the GMR ratio on the Cu-layer thickness is, as expected,
similar to what has been found earlier for conventional spin
valves.
5
B. Resistivity
In order to check whether any irreversible changes were
caused by the elevated temperatures, after each of the mea-
surements of Fig. 2 another magnetoresistance measurement
was done at room temperature. The resistance is a good mea-
sure for a possibly induced change in the material. The ex-
perimental results for R
sat
of the film with 3.0 nm Cu are
presented in Fig. 4. The increase in resistance at the highest
temperatures is probably due to interface diffusion. In this
temperature regime time is an important parameter. Earlier
experiments with rapid thermal processing
1
for 1 min indi-
cated that diffusion starts around 300 °C; the present inves-
tigations show that on a longer time scale 共⬃1.5 h diffusion
effects can be observed at lower temperatures.
Figure 4 shows that no significant change occurs up to
200250 °C. This indicates that the effects that we observe
in this temperature interval are reversible.
The resistance of an identical multilayer as a function of
the temperature is presented in Fig. 5. The resistance in-
creases monotonically up to 250°C, but then starts to de-
crease. It has been verified that this is not due to the sub-
strate, but is a real characteristic of our multilayer. In order
to investigate this remarkable dependence further, the tem-
perature coefficients of constituting materials with and with-
out buffer layer have been measured. The 10-nm-thick films
of Ni
80
Fe
20
and Co
90
Fe
10
showed an approximately linear
temperature dependence at least up to 300 °C with a posi-
tive slope of, respectively, 0.14%/°C and 0.08%/°C. For 10
nm Ir
19
Mn
81
, however, a peculiar temperature dependence
was discovered see Fig. 6: the curve decreases monotoni-
cally and becomes even steeper above 250 °C. Up to
250 °C the slope is around 0.027%/°C, above this tempera-
ture it even almost doubles. It is this increase in the negative
FIG. 2. Magnetoresistance curves of a multilayer consisting of 3.5 nm Ta/
2nm Ni
80
Fe
20
/10 nm Ir
19
Mn
81
/4.5 nm Co
90
Fe
10
/0.8 nm Ru/4 nm
Co
90
Fe
10
/3 nm Cu/0.8 nm Co
90
Fe
10
/5 nm Ni
80
Fe
20
/4 nm Ta at, respectively,
25, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 225, and 250 °C from top down.
FIG. 3. The GMR ratio as a function of temperature for several thicknesses
of the Cu layer.
FIG. 4. The saturation resistance of the multilayer with 3 nm Cu at room
temperature after annealing at several temperatures.
6666 J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 87, No. 9, 1 May 2000 Lenssen
et al.
Downloaded 09 Oct 2009 to 131.155.151.77. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp

slope that causes the maximum in the R(T) curve of the total
multilayer. Repeatedly sweeping the temperature up and
down showed that this effect is reversible and fast, and there-
fore cannot be due to diffusion or a structural phase transfor-
mation.
From Fig. 5 it can be deduced that the temperature co-
efficient of the resistance of our GMR material is almost
constant up to 200 °C and has a value of about 0.1%/°C.
For sensor applications it is interesting to note that this is
almost three times smaller than that of a typical AMR sensor
0.3%/°C.
The discovery of the negative temperature coefficient of
Ir
19
Mn
81
provides the possibility to tune the temperature co-
efficient of our multilayer by adapting the thickness of the
IrMn layer. This is, however, limited in practice, since a
thicker IrMn layer causes more electrical shunting and thus
reduces the GMR ratio. Moreover, the thickness of IrMn
influences the blocking temperature and exchange-biasing
field.
6
C. Exchange biasing
In Fig. 7 the exchange-biasing field is plotted as a func-
tion of the temperature for exchange-biased spin valves with
and without AAF. For the multilayers with AAF this was
defined as the width between the two points where the mag-
netoresistance is half of its maximal value. Because of the
relatively large hysteresis for the spin valves without AAF
the exchange-biasing field has been determined from the
curve for increasing magnetic field. For the conventional
spin valves with a single 4 nm Co
90
Fe
10
layer instead of the
AAF the exchange biasing decreases linearly with tempera-
ture. The temperature value that is obtained if these curves
are extrapolated to zero field is in good agreement with the
blocking temperature that was determined from magnetiza-
tion measurements.
4
It is remarkable that the relative decrease of the
exchange-biasing field is much smaller for the films with an
exchange-biased AAF. This is obviously a big advantage for
sensor applications, in particular in automotive and industrial
environments.
IV. CONCLUSIONS
We have studied the temperature dependence of GMR
ratio, resistance, and exchange-biasing field for a spin valve
comprising an Ir
19
Mn
8
-biased AAF. Up to 200250 °C the
temperature effects are reversible, at higher temperatures
atomic diffusion starts to occur. At 200 °C the magnetoresis-
tance effect is still higher than for AMR sensors at room
temperature.
The resistance of the multilayer shows a maximum
around 250 °C. We found that this is due to the peculiar
behavior of IrMn, which has a negative temperature coef-
ficient of the resistance. This provides a possibility to tune
the temperature coefficient for the complete multilayer by
varying the thickness of the IrMn layer.
The relative decrease of the exchange-biasing field as a
function of temperature is much smaller for spin valves with
AAF than for conventional spin valves.
All measurements indicate that an operating range up to
200 °C seems feasible and that higher operation temperatures
up to 270 °C could be possible for limited times.
1
K.-M. H. Lenssen, A. E. T. Kuiper, and F. Roozeboom, J. Appl. Phys. 85,
5531 1999.
2
Y. Huai, J. Zhang, G. W. Anderson, P. Rana, S. Funada, C.-Y. Hung, M.
Zhao, and S. Tran, J. Appl. Phys. 85,55281999.
3
M. Saito, N. Hasegawa, F. Koike, H. Seki, and T. Kuriyama, J. Appl.
Phys. 85, 4928 1999.
4
J. van Driel, R. Coehoorn, K.-M. H. Lenssen, A. E. T. Kuiper, and F. R.
de Boer, J. Appl. Phys. 85, 5522 1999.
5
Th. G. S. M. Rijks, R. Coehoorn, J. T. F. Daemen, and W. J. M. de Jonge,
J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1092 1994.
6
K.-M. H. Lenssen, J. J. T. M. Donkers, A. E. T. Kuiper, and J. van Driel,
Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 562,331999.
FIG. 5. Temperature dependence of the sheet resistance of the multilayer
with3nmCu.
FIG. 7. Temperature dependence of the exchange-biasing field for spin
valves with solid markers and without open markers AAF squares: 2.5
nm Cu, circles: 3.5 nm Cu.
FIG. 6. Temperature dependence of the sheet resistance of a 10.0 nm
Ir
19
Mn
81
film.
6667J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 87, No. 9, 1 May 2000 Lenssen
et al.
Downloaded 09 Oct 2009 to 131.155.151.77. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright; see http://jap.aip.org/jap/copyright.jsp
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Exchange anisotropy, interlayer exchange coupling and GMR in research and application

TL;DR: In order to achieve optimal performance with giant magnetoresistance (GMR) type sensors various phenomena in layered magnetic structures turn out to be useful and are topics of current research.
Book ChapterDOI

Giant magnetoresistance and magnetic interactions in exchange-biased spin-valves

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors discussed the physics and material science of the three most important magnetic interactions: magnetic anisotropy, interlayer coupling, and exchange anisotropic coupling.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Novel Zero-Drift Detection Method for Highly Sensitive GMR Biochips

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented a drift compensation mechanism for highly sensitive biodetection based on giant magnetoresistive (GMR) sensors and magnetic nanoparticles, which uses both ac current sources and ac magnetic fields along with two dc bias states.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ultrasensitive Magnetic Nanoparticle Detector for Biosensor Applications

TL;DR: With appropriate functionalization for biomolecular recognition, submicron GMR sensor arrays can serve as the basis of ultrasensitive chemical and biological sensors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Giant Magnetoresistance of Metallic Exchange-Coupled Multilayers and Spin Valves

TL;DR: In this article, the microstructure and the magnetic and magnetotransport properties have been investigated depending on the types of magnetic and nonmagnetic materials, composition, nanostructure, and regimes of thermomagnetic treatments for two types of metallic nanostructures.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Interplay between exchange biasing and interlayer exchange coupling in Ni80Fe20/Cu/Ni80Fe20/Fe50Mn50 layered systems

TL;DR: In this paper, the GMR curves were interpreted in terms of a minimum energy model for the magnetization orientation of the Ni80Fe20 layers, and the interlayer exchange coupling was found to be purely ferromagnetic, and monotonically decreasing with increasing tCu.
Journal ArticleDOI

PtMn single and dual spin valves with synthetic ferrimagnet pinned layers

TL;DR: In this paper, a spin valve film with the PtMn/Co/Ru/Co synthetic ferrimagnet pinned layer, in which the magnetization of the two Co layers was strongly coupled in an antiparallel orientation and the magnetisation direction of one of the Co layers is pinned by unidirectional exchange coupling with PtMns, was investigated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Spin-valve heads with synthetic antiferromagnet CoFe/Ru/CoFe/IrMn

TL;DR: In this paper, a spin-valve reader with an anneal at 250 ˚C for 10 h was shown to achieve a GMR ratio of 5.0% with Hex < 200 ǫOe.
Journal ArticleDOI

Thermal stability of Ir–Mn as exchange biasing material

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigated the strength and thermal stability of Ir-Mn (18 at. % Ir) as an exchange biasing material for Ni80Fe20 and Co90Fe10, for configurations with the IrMn layer both below and above the ferromagnetic (F) layer.
Journal ArticleDOI

Robust giant magnetoresistance material system for magnetic sensors

TL;DR: In this article, a robust giant magnetoresistance (GMR) material system is described that comprises an exchange-biased artificial antiferromagnet, which can withstand magnetic fields larger than 150 kA/m and annealing at temperatures above 275 °C without irreversible damage.
Related Papers (5)
Frequently Asked Questions (2)
Q1. What are the contributions mentioned in the paper "Sensor properties of a robust giant magnetoresistance material system at elevated temperatures" ?

• A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher 's website. The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. 

This provides a possibility to tune the temperature coefficient for the complete multilayer by varying the thickness of the Ir–Mn layer.