scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Simulation-Based Fragility Relationships for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

TLDR
In this article, the capacity spectrum method was used to estimate the damage performance limit states of reinforced masonry (URM) buildings in the New Madrid Seismic Zone in the United States.
Abstract
Unreinforced masonry (URM) structures represent a significant portion of the residential building stock of the central and eastern United States. Fifteen percent of homes in the eight-state region impacted by the New Madrid Seismic Zone are URM buildings. The brittle nature of URM buildings further supports a thorough consideration of seismic response given the susceptibility to severe failure modes. Cur- rently, there is a pressing need for analytically based fragility curves for URM buildings. To improve the estimation of damage-state probabil- ities through the development of simulation-based URM fragilities, an extensive literature survey is conducted on pushover analysis. Using these data, capacity curves are generated, from which damage performance limit states are defined. Demand is simulated using synthetically derivedaccelerogramsrepresentativeofthecentralandeasternUnitedStates.Structuralresponseisevaluatedusinganadvancedcapacityspec- trum method. Capacity, demand, and response are thus derived analytically and utilized to generate a more reliable and uniform set of fragility curves for use in loss-assessment software. This paper presents a framework amenable to rapid, flexible updating that, with the appropriate database of studies, is capable of producing curves representative of any URM building typology subjected to a specified hazard. The curves are expressed in multiple forms to demonstrate capability of use in various loss-assessment applications. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943- 541X.0000648. © 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers. CE Database subject headings: Masonry; Seismic effects; Residential buildings. Author keywords: Masonry; Fragility relationships; Seismic vulnerability; Loss assessment; Capacity spectrum method; HAZUS.

read more

Citations
More filters

Fundamentals of earthquake engineering

TL;DR: In this article, the authors deal with the dynamic ASPECTS of the sub-subject: MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS of systems SUBJECTED to INDEPENDENT VIBRATIONS by means of MATHEATICAL MODELS.
Journal ArticleDOI

Seismic fragility assessment of low-rise stone masonry buildings

TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed analytical displacement-based fragility curves reflecting the characteristics of existing stone masonry buildings in Eastern Canada and compared them with fragility curve implicit in the seismic risk assessment tools Hazus and ELER.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analytical fragility curves for masonry school building portfolios in Nepal

TL;DR: This work discusses statistics available for Nepalese schools and then presents analytical fragility curves for three recurrent URM typologies covering more than 50% of the school building stock, integrating the studies available for the region and used for pre-/post-earthquake risk assessment and prioritization of interventions at country level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Numerical assessment of the dynamic response of a URM terraced house exposed to induced seismicity

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors presented the results of a numerical study aimed at extending the utility of a shake table test on an unreinforced masonry building prototype for the seismic assessment of terraced houses in the Groningen region of the Netherlands.
Journal ArticleDOI

Definition of fragility curves through nonlinear static analyses: procedure and application to a mixed masonry-RC building stock

TL;DR: A procedure for the evaluation of the fragility curves that aims to limit the computational effort without losing the reliability of the achieved results and is applied to a building stock typology, consisting of existing mixed masonry-reinforced concrete structures.
References
More filters
BookDOI

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures

null null
TL;DR: Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures as mentioned in this paper gives the latest consensus requirements for dead, live, soil, flood, wind, snow, rain, ice, and earthquake loads.

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures

Edward Cohen
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the requirements for dead, live, soil, wind, snow, rain, and earthquake loads, as well as their combinations, for building codes and other design documents.
Book ChapterDOI

Simulation of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method

TL;DR: One of the essential characteristics of the method is that it distills what is known about the various factors affecting ground motions into simple functional forms that can be incorporated into practical predictions of ground motion.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Nonlinear Analysis Method for Performance‐Based Seismic Design

TL;DR: In this article, a relatively simple nonlinear method for the seismic analysis of structures (the N2 method) is presented, which combines the pushover analysis of a multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) model with the response spectrum analysis of an equivalent single degree-offreedom (SDOF) system.
Journal ArticleDOI

Ground-motion relations for eastern North America

TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed predictive relations for ground motions from eastern North American earthquakes of 4.0, 5.8 and 7.25 at distances of 10 =< R =< 500 km.
Related Papers (5)