scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessDOI

The Binding Effect of NCA Decisions under the Damages Directive: Rationale and Practical Implications

Massimo Merola, +1 more
- Vol. 3, Iss: 1
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the practical implications of the implementation of the Antitrust Damages Directive, which gives decisions issued by National Competition Authorities (NCAs) a key role in “follow-on” damages actions, are analyzed.
Abstract
This article analyses the practical implications of the implementation of Article 9 of the Antitrust Damages Directive, which gives decisions issued by National Competition Authorities (“NCAs”) a key role in “follow-on” damages actions. After setting the scene, by giving a short overview of the legal status prevailing before the Directive and of the institutional process that led to its adoption, the authors propose a critical analysis of Article 9 of the Directive and put forward some considerations on the main practical issues than can surface in its implementation. In this respect, a number of critical points are identified and discussed, most notably in connection with due process rights for defendants and, more generally, potential “interoperability” issues between civil and public proceedings.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Promotion and Harmonization of Antitrust Damages Claims by Directive EU/2014/104?

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors assess the features of the Directive and the challenges it poses for its implementation by Member States, and assess the impact of this Directive on the enforcement of competition law.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of National Decisions on Actions for Competition Damages in the CEE Countries

TL;DR: In this paper, the main issues and arguments presented in the general debate on the binding effect of national competition law decisions, and provides a closer look on this topic with regard to specific CEE countries.
Related Papers (5)