scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The Case for Randomized Field Trials in Economic and Policy Research

Gary Burtless
- 01 May 1995 - 
- Vol. 9, Iss: 2, pp 63-84
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The advantages and disadvantages of experiments in comparison with other research techniques are examined and the circumstances where randomized trials should be preferred over other methods are described.
Abstract
Social experiments have been used in research since the 1960s, yet the technique of controlled experimentation still arouses controversy among social scientists. The crucial element that distinguishes a controlled experiment from other forms of research is random assignment of treatment to the observational units of study. Because treatment differences in the sample occur as a result of random chance, the effects of the treatment on behavior can be measured with high reliability. This paper examines the advantages and disadvantages of experiments in comparison with other research techniques and describes the circumstances where randomized trials should be preferred over other methods.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme

TL;DR: This paper decompose the conventional measure of evaluation bias into several components and find that bias due to selection on unobservables, commonly called selection bias in econometrics, is empirically less important than other components, although it is still a sizeable fraction of the estimated programme impact.
Book ChapterDOI

The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the impacts of active labor market policies, such as job training, job search assistance, and job subsidies, and the methods used to evaluate their effectiveness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation

TL;DR: In the last two decades, much research has been done on the econometric and statistical analysis of such causal effects as discussed by the authors, which has reached a level of maturity that makes it an important tool in many areas of empirical research in economics, including labor economics, public finance, development economics, industrial organization, and other areas in empirical microeconomics.
Journal ArticleDOI

The microfinance promise

TL;DR: In this article, the authors highlight the diversity of innovative mechanisms beyond group-lending contracts, the measurement of financial sustainability, the estimation of economic and social impacts, the costs and benefits of subsidization, and the potential to reduce poverty through savings programs rather than just credit.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?

TL;DR: The authors applied cross-sectional and longitudinal propensity score matching estimators to data from the National Supported Work (NSW) Demonstration that have been previously analyzed by LaLonde (1986) and Dehejia and Wahba (1999, 2002).
References
More filters
Book

Statistical Methods for Research Workers

R. A. Fisher
TL;DR: The prime object of as discussed by the authors is to put into the hands of research workers, and especially of biologists, the means of applying statistical tests accurately to numerical data accumulated in their own laboratories or available in the literature.
Book

Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research

TL;DR: A survey drawn from social science research which deals with correlational, ex post facto, true experimental, and quasi-experimental designs and makes methodological recommendations is presented in this article.
Posted Content

Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics

TL;DR: The applied econometrician is like a farmer who notices that the yield is somewhat higher under trees where birds roost, and he uses this as evidence that bird droppings increase yields.
Posted Content

Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.

TL;DR: This work estimates how cost sharing, the portion of the bill the patient pays, affects the demand for medical services and rejects the hypothesis that less favorable coverage of outpatient services increases total expenditure.
Related Papers (5)