scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection

TLDR
The new ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA can reliably classify patients for clinical studies and may help rheumatologists in clinical practice in diagnosing axial spondyloarthritis in those with chronic back pain.
Abstract
Objective: To validate and refine two sets of candidate criteria for the classification/diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis (SpA). Methods: All Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) members were invited to include consecutively new patients with chronic (⩾3 months) back pain of unknown origin that began before 45 years of age. The candidate criteria were first tested in the entire cohort of 649 patients from 25 centres, and then refined in a random selection of 40% of cases and thereafter validated in the remaining 60%. Results: Upon diagnostic work-up, axial SpA was diagnosed in 60.2% of the cohort. Of these, 70% did not fulfil modified New York criteria and, therefore, were classified as having “non-radiographic” axial SpA. Refinement of the candidate criteria resulted in new ASAS classification criteria that are defined as: the presence of sacroiliitis by radiography or by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plus at least one SpA feature (“imaging arm”) or the presence of HLA-B27 plus at least two SpA features (“clinical arm”). The sensitivity and specificity of the entire set of the new criteria were 82.9% and 84.4%, and for the imaging arm alone 66.2% and 97.3%, respectively. The specificity of the new criteria was much better than that of the European Spondylarthropathy Study Group criteria modified for MRI (sensitivity 85.1%, specificity 65.1%) and slightly better than that of the modified Amor criteria (sensitivity 82.9, specificity 77.5%). Conclusion: The new ASAS classification criteria for axial SpA can reliably classify patients for clinical studies and may help rheumatologists in clinical practice in diagnosing axial SpA in those with chronic back pain. Trial registration number: NCT00328068.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society (ASAS) handbook: a guide to assess spondyloarthritis

TL;DR: A comprehensive handbook on the most relevant aspects for the assessments of spondyloarthritis, covering classification criteria, MRI and x rays for sacroiliac joints and the spine, a complete set of all measurements relevant for clinical trials and international recommendations for the management of SpA are provided.
Journal ArticleDOI

2010 update of the ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis

TL;DR: The ASAS/EULAR recommendations on the management of ankylo sing spondylitis (AS) are based on the original paper, a systematic review of existing recommendations and the literature since 2005 and the discussion and agreement among 21 international experts, 2 patients and 2 physiotherapists in a meeting in February 2010 as mentioned in this paper.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria.

TL;DR: The study showed the clinical history screening test for AS to be moderately sensitive, but it might be better in clinical practice, and substitution of the Rome pain criterion for the New York pain criterion is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The European spondylarthropathy study group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy

TL;DR: The proposed classification criteria for spondylarthropathy are easy to apply in clinical practice and performed well in all 7 participating centers and are regarded as preliminary until they have been further evaluated in other settings.
Journal ArticleDOI

The early disease stage in axial spondylarthritis: results from the German Spondyloarthritis Inception Cohort.

TL;DR: Clinical manifestations and disease activity measures are highly comparable between patients with early nonradiographic axial SpA and those with early AS, suggesting that these 2 entities are part of the same disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

How to diagnose axial spondyloarthritis early

TL;DR: This approach can help clinicians to diagnose with a high degree of confidence axial SpA at an early stage in patients with IBP who lack radiographic sacroiliitis.
Related Papers (5)