scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research.

Travis W. Beck
- 01 Aug 2013 - 
- Vol. 27, Iss: 8, pp 2323-2337
TLDR
The purpose of this tutorial is to describe procedures for estimating sample size for a variety of different experimental designs that are common in strength and conditioning research, using the G*Power software package.
Abstract
The statistical power, or sensitivity of an experiment, is defined as the probability of rejecting a false null hypothesis. Only 3 factors can affect statistical power: (a) the significance level ([alpha]), (b) the magnitude or size of the treatment effect (effect size), and (c) the sample size (n). Of these 3 factors, only the sample size can be manipulated by the investigator because the significance level is usually selected before the study, and the effect size is determined by the effectiveness of the treatment. Thus, selection of an appropriate sample size is one of the most important components of research design but is often misunderstood by beginning researchers. The purpose of this tutorial is to describe procedures for estimating sample size for a variety of different experimental designs that are common in strength and conditioning research. Emphasis is placed on selecting an appropriate effect size because this step fully determines sample size when power and the significance level are fixed. There are many different software packages that can be used for sample size estimation. However, I chose to describe the procedures for the G*Power software package (version 3.1.4) because this software is freely downloadable and capable of estimating sample size for many of the different statistical tests used in strength and conditioning research. Furthermore, G*Power provides a number of different auxiliary features that can be useful for researchers when designing studies. It is my hope that the procedures described in this article will be beneficial for researchers in the field of strength and conditioning.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The relationships between internal and external training load models during basketball training

TL;DR: Basketball coaching and conditioning professionals should not assume a linear dose-response between accelerometer and internal training load models during training and are recommended to combine internal and external approaches when monitoring training load in players.
Journal ArticleDOI

The effects of safety behaviors during exposure therapy for anxiety: Critical analysis from an inhibitory learning perspective

TL;DR: The present review critically examines the literature addressing the role of safety behaviors in exposure therapy from an inhibitory learning perspective and discussesLimitations, future directions, and clinical recommendations are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Do stiffness and asymmetries predict change of direction performance

TL;DR: Results suggest that overall vertical stiffness and drop jump height asymmetry are the strongest predictors of CODS in a healthy, non-athletic population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Power, precision, and sample size estimation in sport and exercise science research

TL;DR: The majority of papers submitted to the Journal of Sports Sciences are experimental, and the data are collected from a sample of the population and then used to test hypotheses and/or make inferences about the population.
Journal ArticleDOI

Creatine Kinase and Lactate Dehydrogenase Responses after Different Resistance and Aerobic Exercise Protocols

TL;DR: In conclusion, aerobic exercise performed at 80% of VO2max appears to elevate plasma CK levels more than bi-set RE sessions, however, the bi- set and multiple sets RE sessions appeared to trigger greater levels of blood LDH compared to aerobic protocols performed at 60% and 80%, respectively.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences

TL;DR: G*Power 3 provides improved effect size calculators and graphic options, supports both distribution-based and design-based input modes, and offers all types of power analyses in which users might be interested.
Journal ArticleDOI

A power primer.

TL;DR: A convenient, although not comprehensive, presentation of required sample sizes is providedHere the sample sizes necessary for .80 power to detect effects at these levels are tabled for eight standard statistical tests.
Journal ArticleDOI

Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.

TL;DR: In the new version, procedures to analyze the power of tests based on single-sample tetrachoric correlations, comparisons of dependent correlations, bivariate linear regression, multiple linear regression based on the random predictor model, logistic regression, and Poisson regression are added.
Journal ArticleDOI

GPOWER: A general power analysis program

TL;DR: GPOWER performs high-precision statistical power analyses for the most common statistical tests in behavioral research, that is,t tests,F tests, andχ2 tests.
Journal ArticleDOI

The earth is round (p < .05)

TL;DR: The authors reviewed the problems with null hypothesis significance testing, including near universal misinterpretation of p as the probability that H is false, the misinterpretation that its complement is the probability of successful replication, and the mistaken assumption that if one rejects H₀ one thereby affirms the theory that led to the test.
Related Papers (5)