scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review

TLDR
In this paper, a systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers and found that the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food have been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.
Abstract
Background Consumers’ perceptions of naturalness are important for the acceptance of foods and food technologies. Thus, several studies have examined the significance of naturalness among consumers. Nonetheless, the aspects that are considered essential in perceiving a food item as natural may vary across consumers and different stakeholder groups. Scope and approach This systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) How has the perceived importance of naturalness for consumers been defined and measured? 2) To what extent is perceived naturalness important to consumers? 3) Are there individual differences regarding the importance given to food naturalness that can be explained by consumers' characteristics? 4) Do consumers’ attitudes toward food naturalness influence their intentions and behavior? Key findings and conclusions The review clearly shows that for the majority of consumers, food naturalness is crucial. This finding could be observed across countries and in the different years when the studies were conducted. Therefore, neglecting the aspect of naturalness in the food industry may be very costly in the end. Our review also reveals differences across studies in how naturalness has been defined and measured. Based on a content analysis of the measurement scales, the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food has been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Targeted formulation of plant-based protein-foods: Supporting the food system’s transformation in the context of human health, environmental sustainability and consumer trends

TL;DR: In this article , a more holistic approach in evaluating food and diet quality (supply of dietary fibre, micronutrients and moderate levels of glycaemic load, salt, saturated fats) has been advocated.
Journal ArticleDOI

Predicting how consumers perceive the naturalness of snacks: The usefulness of a simple index

TL;DR: In this article, an objectively defined Food Naturalness Index (FNI) was used to predict perceived naturalness with a high degree of accuracy with a sample of 179 participants ranked 28 snacks, ranging from least natural to the most natural.
Journal ArticleDOI

High-Throughput Quantitation of Key Cocoa Tastants by Means of Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Application to a Global Sample Set.

TL;DR: In this article, the key taste components of cocoa were identified and characterized by combining sensory analysis, fractionation, and structure elucidation, and the key principle for cocoa bitterness was shown to be the combination of alkaloids and 2,5-diketopiperazines.
Journal ArticleDOI

Corporate social responsibility as a catalyst of circular economy? A case study perspective in Agri-food

TL;DR: In this article , an exploratory, qualitative research design has been adopted to study the phenomenon in detail, as it facilitates the understanding of complex phenomena such those under investigation and helps enrich existing theory with new insights from real-world cases to add theoretical generalizations to the existing body of research in the field.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

TL;DR: In this paper, a general formula (α) of which a special case is the Kuder-Richardson coefficient of equivalence is shown to be the mean of all split-half coefficients resulting from different splittings of a test, therefore an estimate of the correlation between two random samples of items from a universe of items like those in the test.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Does naturalness increase food adoption?

The paper states that consumers perceive food naturalness as crucial, but it does not explicitly mention whether naturalness increases food adoption.