scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review

TLDR
In this paper, a systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers and found that the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food have been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.
Abstract
Background Consumers’ perceptions of naturalness are important for the acceptance of foods and food technologies. Thus, several studies have examined the significance of naturalness among consumers. Nonetheless, the aspects that are considered essential in perceiving a food item as natural may vary across consumers and different stakeholder groups. Scope and approach This systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) How has the perceived importance of naturalness for consumers been defined and measured? 2) To what extent is perceived naturalness important to consumers? 3) Are there individual differences regarding the importance given to food naturalness that can be explained by consumers' characteristics? 4) Do consumers’ attitudes toward food naturalness influence their intentions and behavior? Key findings and conclusions The review clearly shows that for the majority of consumers, food naturalness is crucial. This finding could be observed across countries and in the different years when the studies were conducted. Therefore, neglecting the aspect of naturalness in the food industry may be very costly in the end. Our review also reveals differences across studies in how naturalness has been defined and measured. Based on a content analysis of the measurement scales, the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food has been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Would you eat a burger made in a petri dish? Why people feel disgusted by cultured meat

TL;DR: This article found that 35% of meat-eaters and 55% of vegetarians find cultured meat too disgusting to eat and that perceived unnaturalness predicts disgust among both meat eaters and vegetarians.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development and implementation of a qualitative framework for the sustainable management of wine companies

TL;DR: From the results it emerges that the framework guides the structural transformation of wine farms towards sustainable production and management by assisting the wine producers in identifying emerging opportunities in wine sector, such as fostering network with local communities, defining better soil, and water management through a multi-actor approach.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring reserve lots of Cymbopogon citratus, Aloysia citrodora and Thymus × citriodorus as improved sources of phenolic compounds.

TL;DR: Evidence of the differences between these plants chemical composition and bioactivity depending on the harvesting conditions is provided, with the reserve lot presenting the highest activity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Back in Touch with Contagion: Some Essential Issues

TL;DR: Since the introduction of contagion theory to the psychological literature in the 1980s and 1990s, research and interest in the topic have proliferated, especially as related to consumer psychology.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sales of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Australia: A Trend Analysis from 1997 to 2018

TL;DR: Major, long-term shifts are occurring in the market for non-alcoholic, water-based beverages in Australia, notably a fall in per capita volume sales of SSBs and an increase inVolume sales of water, which are consistent with obesity prevention strategies.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

TL;DR: In this paper, a general formula (α) of which a special case is the Kuder-Richardson coefficient of equivalence is shown to be the mean of all split-half coefficients resulting from different splittings of a test, therefore an estimate of the correlation between two random samples of items from a universe of items like those in the test.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Does naturalness increase food adoption?

The paper states that consumers perceive food naturalness as crucial, but it does not explicitly mention whether naturalness increases food adoption.