scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review

TLDR
In this paper, a systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers and found that the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food have been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.
Abstract
Background Consumers’ perceptions of naturalness are important for the acceptance of foods and food technologies. Thus, several studies have examined the significance of naturalness among consumers. Nonetheless, the aspects that are considered essential in perceiving a food item as natural may vary across consumers and different stakeholder groups. Scope and approach This systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) How has the perceived importance of naturalness for consumers been defined and measured? 2) To what extent is perceived naturalness important to consumers? 3) Are there individual differences regarding the importance given to food naturalness that can be explained by consumers' characteristics? 4) Do consumers’ attitudes toward food naturalness influence their intentions and behavior? Key findings and conclusions The review clearly shows that for the majority of consumers, food naturalness is crucial. This finding could be observed across countries and in the different years when the studies were conducted. Therefore, neglecting the aspect of naturalness in the food industry may be very costly in the end. Our review also reveals differences across studies in how naturalness has been defined and measured. Based on a content analysis of the measurement scales, the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food has been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Review of factors affecting consumer acceptance of cultured meat

TL;DR: The most important factors influencing consumer acceptance/rejection of cultured meat include public awareness, perceived naturalness, and food-related risk perception as discussed by the authors, while the effect of demographic factors is mixed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sustainability matters: consumer acceptance of different vertical farming systems.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify the major drivers of consumer acceptance of vertical farming systems through structural equation modeling and find that perceived sustainability is the major driver of consumer accept of vertical farms.
Journal ArticleDOI

Infant Cereals: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Opportunities for Whole Grains

TL;DR: The complementary feeding period is absolutely key in shaping the infant’s food preferences and habits; therefore, it is the appropriate stage in life at which to introduce whole grain cereals for the acceptance of whole grains across the entire lifespan.
Journal ArticleDOI

Metal (Pb, Cu, Cd, and Zn) Transfer along Food Chain and Health Risk Assessment through Raw Milk Consumption from Free-Range Cows.

TL;DR: The consumption of milk produced by small local farmers does not pose noncarcinogenic risks and more extended studies should be carried out in order to identify the potential carcinogenic risk caused by the low levels of metals in the milk consumed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The potential impact of synthetic animal protein on livestock production: The new “war against agriculture”?

TL;DR: Analysis of the specific synthetic animal protein case suggests that, while there are many additional issues that could affect any transition, three aspects are key: development of transferrable technologies in the medical sector, potential environmental advantages, and a lack of consumer resistance to its “unnatural” nature.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

TL;DR: Moher et al. as mentioned in this paper introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses, which is used in this paper.
Journal Article

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.

TL;DR: The QUOROM Statement (QUality Of Reporting Of Meta-analyses) as mentioned in this paper was developed to address the suboptimal reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests.

TL;DR: In this paper, a general formula (α) of which a special case is the Kuder-Richardson coefficient of equivalence is shown to be the mean of all split-half coefficients resulting from different splittings of a test, therefore an estimate of the correlation between two random samples of items from a universe of items like those in the test.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

TL;DR: A structured summary is provided including, as applicable, background, objectives, data sources, study eligibility criteria, participants, interventions, study appraisal and synthesis methods, results, limitations, conclusions and implications of key findings.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Does naturalness increase food adoption?

The paper states that consumers perceive food naturalness as crucial, but it does not explicitly mention whether naturalness increases food adoption.