scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The importance of food naturalness for consumers: Results of a systematic review

TLDR
In this paper, a systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers and found that the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food have been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.
Abstract
Background Consumers’ perceptions of naturalness are important for the acceptance of foods and food technologies. Thus, several studies have examined the significance of naturalness among consumers. Nonetheless, the aspects that are considered essential in perceiving a food item as natural may vary across consumers and different stakeholder groups. Scope and approach This systematic review identified 72 studies conducted in 32 countries involving 85,348 consumers. We aimed to answer the following questions: 1) How has the perceived importance of naturalness for consumers been defined and measured? 2) To what extent is perceived naturalness important to consumers? 3) Are there individual differences regarding the importance given to food naturalness that can be explained by consumers' characteristics? 4) Do consumers’ attitudes toward food naturalness influence their intentions and behavior? Key findings and conclusions The review clearly shows that for the majority of consumers, food naturalness is crucial. This finding could be observed across countries and in the different years when the studies were conducted. Therefore, neglecting the aspect of naturalness in the food industry may be very costly in the end. Our review also reveals differences across studies in how naturalness has been defined and measured. Based on a content analysis of the measurement scales, the items used to measure the importance of naturalness can be classified into three categories: 1) the way the food has been grown (food origin), 2) how the food has been produced (what technology and ingredients have been used), and 3) the properties of the final product.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat.

TL;DR: It is demonstrated that acceptance of the alternative proteins included here is relatively low (compared to that of meat); acceptance of insects is lowest, followed by acceptance of cultured meat, and pulses and plant-based alternative proteins have the highest acceptance level.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: A systematic review

TL;DR: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature is presented, and the most important objections and benefits to consumers are evaluated, as well as highlighting areas for future research.
Journal ArticleDOI

Innovation can accelerate the transition towards a sustainable food system

TL;DR: In this article, the authors identify technologies, assess their readiness and propose eight action points that could accelerate the transition towards a more sustainable food system and argue that the speed of innovation could be significantly increased with the appropriate incentives, regulations and social licence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consumer acceptance of novel food technologies

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors organize the research describing how heuristics and individual differences among consumers influence the acceptance of agri-food technologies and explore factors that may explain consumers' acceptance or lack of acceptance.
Journal ArticleDOI

Perceived naturalness and evoked disgust influence acceptance of cultured meat

TL;DR: It is important to explain cultured meat in a nontechnical way that emphasizes the final product, not the production method, to increase acceptance of this novel food.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Attitudes toward chemicals are associated with preference for natural food

TL;DR: The authors found that general positive and negative attitudes toward synthetic chemicals and dose-response insensitivity influence consumers' risk perceptions of chemicals in food and preference for natural food and found that women are more sensitive than men to chemical exposure hazards.
Journal ArticleDOI

Motives underlying healthy eating: using the Food Choice Questionnaire to explain variation in dietary intake.

TL;DR: The Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ), which measures the reported importance to a given individual of nine factors underlying food choice, and a food frequency questionnaire, were administered to 241 participants, who were also required to classify their diet as either'standard', 'low in red meat' or'vegetarian'.
Journal ArticleDOI

Willingness to try new foods as predicted by social representations and attitude and trait scales

TL;DR: The structure and predictive ability of social representation of new foods were investigated and compared with instruments measuring relevant attitudes and traits using a questionnaire quantifying these aspects, and the SR dimensions markedly improved the prediction.
Journal ArticleDOI

Food Choice Questionnaire (FCQ) revisited. Suggestions for the development of an enhanced general food motivation model.

TL;DR: Some of the basic components of the original FCQ can be used as a basis for a new general food motivation typology and the development of such a new instrument, with fewer, of higher abstraction FCQ-based dimensions and fewer items per dimension, is a right step forward.
Journal ArticleDOI

European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural.

TL;DR: There is a surprising degree of similarity in conceptions of natural across the six countries, with a focus of food (and beverages) as central to the idea of natural, and links to the ideas of biological, healthy, plants, and the environment.
Related Papers (5)
Trending Questions (1)
Does naturalness increase food adoption?

The paper states that consumers perceive food naturalness as crucial, but it does not explicitly mention whether naturalness increases food adoption.