scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors propose a set of rules for managers to measure when traditional good management principles should be followed or rejected, based on the analysis of the disk drive industry, and demonstrate how a manager can overcome the challenges of disruptive technologies using these principles of disruptive innovation.
Abstract
Analyzes how successful firms fail when confronted with technological and market changes, prescribing a list of rules for firms to follow as a solution. Precisely because of their adherence to good management principles, innovative, well-managed firms fail at the emergence of disruptive technologies - that is, innovations that disrupt the existing dominant technologies in the market. Unfortunately, it usually does not make sense to invest in disruptive technologies until after they have taken over the market. Thus, instead of exercising what are typically good managerial decisions, at the introduction of technical or market change it is very often the case that managers must make counterintuitive decisions not to listen to customers, to invest in lower-performance products that produce lower margins, and to pursue small markets. From analysis of the disk drive industry, a set of rules is devised - the principles of disruptive innovation - for managers to measure when traditional good management principles should be followed or rejected. According to the principles of disruptive innovation, a manager should plan to fail early, often, and inexpensively, developing disruptive technologies in small organizations operating within a niche market and with a relevant customer base. A case study in the electric-powered vehicles market illustrates how a manager can overcome the challenges of disruptive technologies using these principles of disruptive innovation. The mechanical excavator industry in the mid-twentieth century is also described, as an example in which most companies failed because they were unwilling to forego cable excavator technology for hydraulics machines. While there is no "right answer" or formula to use when reacting to unpredictable technological change, managers will be able to adapt as long as they realize that "good" managerial practices are only situationally appropriate. Though disruptive technologies are inherently high-risk, the more a firm invests in them, the more it learns about the emerging market and the changing needs of consumers, so that incremental advances may lead to industry-changing leaps. (CJC)

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Competitive Strategy for Media Companies in the Mobile Internet

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present three strategic options for media companies: a syndication strategy, a portal strategy, and a mobile virtual network operator strategy in the mobile Internet, and present an overview of distinctive features of the mobile internet related to personalization, time and location sensitivity, uncertainties between technology push and market pull, and motivations for engagement in mobile interactivity.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Cost of Financing Education: Can Student Debt Hinder Entrepreneurship?

TL;DR: This paper found that student debt is negatively related to the propensity to start a firm, and that individuals with more student debt have less profitable and smaller firms, and the negative relation between student debt and entrepreneurship is stronger when the individual is younger, works in a high technology industry, and has a dependent spouse.
Journal ArticleDOI

Technological evolution and interdependence in China's emerging biofuel industry

TL;DR: Li et al. as discussed by the authors used the European Patent Office worldwide patent database and applied two-stage interactive data collection methods to reveal the evolving technological interdependence for China's emerging biofuel industry.
Journal ArticleDOI

The united innovation process: Integrating science, design, and entrepreneurship as sub-processes

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors propose a unified view of the innovation process, which advocates uniting the complementary science, design, and entrepreneurship sub-processes of innovation, with a few detailed real life examples.
Related Papers (5)