scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors propose a set of rules for managers to measure when traditional good management principles should be followed or rejected, based on the analysis of the disk drive industry, and demonstrate how a manager can overcome the challenges of disruptive technologies using these principles of disruptive innovation.
Abstract
Analyzes how successful firms fail when confronted with technological and market changes, prescribing a list of rules for firms to follow as a solution. Precisely because of their adherence to good management principles, innovative, well-managed firms fail at the emergence of disruptive technologies - that is, innovations that disrupt the existing dominant technologies in the market. Unfortunately, it usually does not make sense to invest in disruptive technologies until after they have taken over the market. Thus, instead of exercising what are typically good managerial decisions, at the introduction of technical or market change it is very often the case that managers must make counterintuitive decisions not to listen to customers, to invest in lower-performance products that produce lower margins, and to pursue small markets. From analysis of the disk drive industry, a set of rules is devised - the principles of disruptive innovation - for managers to measure when traditional good management principles should be followed or rejected. According to the principles of disruptive innovation, a manager should plan to fail early, often, and inexpensively, developing disruptive technologies in small organizations operating within a niche market and with a relevant customer base. A case study in the electric-powered vehicles market illustrates how a manager can overcome the challenges of disruptive technologies using these principles of disruptive innovation. The mechanical excavator industry in the mid-twentieth century is also described, as an example in which most companies failed because they were unwilling to forego cable excavator technology for hydraulics machines. While there is no "right answer" or formula to use when reacting to unpredictable technological change, managers will be able to adapt as long as they realize that "good" managerial practices are only situationally appropriate. Though disruptive technologies are inherently high-risk, the more a firm invests in them, the more it learns about the emerging market and the changing needs of consumers, so that incremental advances may lead to industry-changing leaps. (CJC)

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A brand so bad it’s good: The paradoxical place marketing of Belfast

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors describe the paradoxical outcomes of an urban branding exercise in Belfast, one of the world's most infamous cities, and argue that Belfast's branding is not only far from futile but a perversely paradoxical form of marketing that's so bad it's good.
ReportDOI

How Destructive Is Innovation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors use U.S. Census data on manufacturing firms from 1963 through 2002 to show that most growth comes from incumbents' innovation rather than innovation by entrants.
Journal ArticleDOI

Biophilic campus: An emerging planning approach for a sustainable innovation-conducive university

TL;DR: In this article, a comprehensive framework based on earlier studies to promote the linkages between sustainability and innovation through deploying the values, patterns and elements of biophilic design is proposed.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Profession(s)’ Engagements with LawTech: Narratives and Archetypes of Future Law

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that there are three narratives to technology's role in augmenting, disrupting or ending the current legal services environment, each of which gives life to particular legal professional archetypes in how lawyers react to LawTech.
Journal ArticleDOI

Success in innovation implementation

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that the key to successful innovation implementation rests on the convergence of three different factors: an innovation must be properly framed in terms of stakeholders' expectations, a good internal innovation environment must be present, and the pros of specific attributes of innovations must outweigh their cons.
Related Papers (5)