scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessPosted Content

The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the authors propose a set of rules for managers to measure when traditional good management principles should be followed or rejected, based on the analysis of the disk drive industry, and demonstrate how a manager can overcome the challenges of disruptive technologies using these principles of disruptive innovation.
Abstract
Analyzes how successful firms fail when confronted with technological and market changes, prescribing a list of rules for firms to follow as a solution. Precisely because of their adherence to good management principles, innovative, well-managed firms fail at the emergence of disruptive technologies - that is, innovations that disrupt the existing dominant technologies in the market. Unfortunately, it usually does not make sense to invest in disruptive technologies until after they have taken over the market. Thus, instead of exercising what are typically good managerial decisions, at the introduction of technical or market change it is very often the case that managers must make counterintuitive decisions not to listen to customers, to invest in lower-performance products that produce lower margins, and to pursue small markets. From analysis of the disk drive industry, a set of rules is devised - the principles of disruptive innovation - for managers to measure when traditional good management principles should be followed or rejected. According to the principles of disruptive innovation, a manager should plan to fail early, often, and inexpensively, developing disruptive technologies in small organizations operating within a niche market and with a relevant customer base. A case study in the electric-powered vehicles market illustrates how a manager can overcome the challenges of disruptive technologies using these principles of disruptive innovation. The mechanical excavator industry in the mid-twentieth century is also described, as an example in which most companies failed because they were unwilling to forego cable excavator technology for hydraulics machines. While there is no "right answer" or formula to use when reacting to unpredictable technological change, managers will be able to adapt as long as they realize that "good" managerial practices are only situationally appropriate. Though disruptive technologies are inherently high-risk, the more a firm invests in them, the more it learns about the emerging market and the changing needs of consumers, so that incremental advances may lead to industry-changing leaps. (CJC)

read more

Citations
More filters
Book

Small Is Profitable

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a framework for distributed generation and a call to action for the private sector to take action in order to address the challenges of the existing power system and the benefits of distributed resources.
Journal ArticleDOI

Self-experimentation as a source of new ideas: Ten examples about sleep, mood, health, and weight

TL;DR: This article found that standing 8 hours per day reduced early awakening and made sleep more restorative, even though more standing was associated with less sleep, while drinking unflavored fructose water had a similar effect.
Journal ArticleDOI

Influence and inefficiency in the internal capital market

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors model inefficient resource allocations in M-form organizations due to influence activities by division managers that skew capital budgets in their favor, and show that investment sensitivity to Tobin's Q is higher than first-best in firms where division managers hold equity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Foundations of Entrepreneurial Strategy

TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a choice-oriented process for entrepreneurial decision-making under uncertainty and the paradox of entrepreneurship, which they call Learning by Commitment (LBC).
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring value creation from corporate-foresight activities

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors identify four success criteria for corporate foresight activities: foresighters committed to creating value, participation of internal stakeholders, analysis that follows a systemic logic, and methods and processes that are tailored to companies' needs.
Related Papers (5)