scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Young people's perspectives on patient-reported outcome measures in inflammatory arthritis: results of a multicentre European qualitative study from a EULAR task force.

TLDR
In this article, a multinational qualitative study was conducted in Austria, Croatia, Italy and the Netherlands to explore whether patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) adequately cover the perspective of young people with inflammatory arthritis from different European countries.
Abstract
Introduction Although patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used in clinical practice and research, it is unclear whether these instruments cover the perspective of young people with inflammatory arthritis (IA). The aims of this study were to explore whether PROMs commonly used in IA adequately cover the perspective of young people from different European countries. Methods A multinational qualitative study was conducted in Austria, Croatia, Italy and the Netherlands. Young people with either rheumatoid arthritis (RA), juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), Still’s disease, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or spondyloarthritis (SpA), aged 18–35 years, participated in semistructured focus group interviews. Thematic analysis was used and data saturation was defined as no new emergent concepts in at least three subsequent focus groups. Results Fifty-three patients (21 with RA/JIA/Still’s, 17 with PsA, 15 with SpA; 72% women) participated in 12 focus groups. Participants expressed a general positive attitude towards PROMs and emphasised their importance in clinical practice. In addition, 48 lower level concepts were extracted and summarised into 6 higher level concepts describing potential issues for improvement. These included: need for lay-term information regarding the purpose of using PROMs; updates of certain outdated items and using digital technology for data acquisition. Some participants admitted their tendency to rate pain, fatigue or disease activity differently from what they actually felt for various reasons. Conclusions Despite their general positive attitude, young people with IA suggested areas for PROM development to ensure that important concepts are included, making PROMs relevant over the entire course of a chronic disease.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Patient perceptions of outcome measures in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: A study of the Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors performed a cross-sectional evaluation of patient perceptions of the Inflammatory Rasch-built Overall Disability Scale (I-RODS) from 41 subjects with CIDP through a structured questionnaire.
Journal ArticleDOI

Stakeholder outcome prioritization in the Biologic Abatement and Capturing Kids' Outcomes and Flare Frequency in Juvenile Spondyloarthritis (BACK‐OFF JSpA) trial

TL;DR: The Back Off Juvenile Spondyloarthritis (BACK-OFF JSpA) trial as discussed by the authors is a randomized, pragmatic trial investigating different tumour necrosis factor inhibitor de-escalation strategies for children with sustained inactive disease.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Your Rheum story: involvement of young people in rheumatology research

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors describe the development of a national youth advisory group in UK rheumatology, an important addition to the evolving evidence base to support the involvement of young people in research.
Journal ArticleDOI

An electronic patient-reported outcome created based on my needs is worth using: an explorative qualitative study investigating young people’s opinions for a health assessment tool

TL;DR: In this article , the authors explored young people's view on content and design of an ePRO to provide an overview of their health and health related problems when visiting a YHC, and their opinion on what healthcare needs to consider when using the ePRO.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

John E. Ware, +1 more
- 01 Jun 1992 - 
TL;DR: A 36-item short-form survey designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study is constructed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups

TL;DR: The criteria included in COREQ, a 32-item checklist, can help researchers to report important aspects of the research team, study methods, context of the study, findings, analysis and interpretations.
Journal Article

InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors introduce the concept of the research interview as a conversation and discuss the social construction of validity of the interview report and the ethical issues in conducting research interviews.
Book ChapterDOI

World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

TL;DR: Comparing the socialist nature of many European counties, there is a requirement that provision be made for patients to be made whole regardless of the outcomes of the trial or if they happened to have been randomized to a control group that did not enjoy the benefits of a successful experimental intervention.
Journal ArticleDOI

Analysing qualitative data

TL;DR: Qualitative research produces large amounts of textual data in the form of transcripts and observational fieldnotes, and the systematic and rigorous preparation and analysis of these data is time consuming and labour intensive.
Related Papers (5)