scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

YouTube for Information on Rheumatoid Arthritis -- A Wakeup Call?

Abha G. Singh, +2 more
- 01 May 2012 - 
- Vol. 39, Iss: 5, pp 899-903
TLDR
YouTube is a source of information on RA, of variable quality, with wide viewership and potential to influence patients’ knowledge and behavior, and Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about RA, and empower patients to discriminate useful from misleading information.
Abstract
Objective Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a common debilitating autoimmune disease, with unmet need for knowledge among patients and the general population. YouTube is a popular, consumer-generated, video-sharing website, which can be a source of information on RA. We investigated the quality of information on RA on YouTube and analyzed audience interaction. Methods YouTube was searched using the term “Rheumatoid Arthritis,” for videos uploaded on RA. Two physicians independently classified videos as useful, misleading, or patient views, and rated them on a 5-point global quality scale (GQS; 1 = poor quality, 5 = excellent quality). Useful videos were rated for reliability and content, on a 5-point scale (higher scores represent more reliable and comprehensive videos). Source of videos was also noted. Audience interaction was assessed through video viewership. Results A total of 102 relevant videos were identified; 54.9% were classified as useful (GQS 2.9 ± 1.0) and 30.4% deemed misleading (GQS 1.3 ± 1.6). Mean reliability and content score of useful videos was 3.2 (± 1.0) and 2.5 (± 1.2), respectively. All videos uploaded by university channels and professional organizations provided useful information but formed only 12.7% of total videos, whereas 73.9% of medical advertisements and videos by for-profit organizations were misleading. There was no difference in the viewership/day (10.0 vs 21.5; p = nonsignificant) of useful and misleading information. Conclusion YouTube is a source of information on RA, of variable quality, with wide viewership and potential to influence patients’ knowledge and behavior. Physicians and professional organizations should be aware of and embrace this evolving technology to raise awareness about RA, and empower patients to discriminate useful from misleading information.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review

TL;DR: The need to design interventions to enable consumers to critically assimilate the information posted on YouTube with more authoritative information sources to make effective healthcare decisions is recognized.
Journal ArticleDOI

YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19: a pandemic of misinformation?

TL;DR: Over one-quarter of the most viewed YouTube videos on COVID-19 contained misleading information, reaching millions of viewers worldwide, highlighting the need to better use YouTube to deliver timely and accurate information and to minimise the spread of misinformation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Misleading Health-Related Information Promoted Through Video-Based Social Media: Anorexia on YouTube

TL;DR: More research is needed to study the characteristics of pro-anorexia videos in order to develop algorithms that will automatically detect and filter those videos before they become popular, and to investigate anorexia-related misinformation disseminated through YouTube videos.
Journal ArticleDOI

Evaluating the Accuracy and Quality of the Information in Kyphosis Videos Shared on YouTube.

Mehmet Nuri Erdem, +1 more
- 15 Nov 2018 - 
TL;DR: Online information on kyphosis is low quality and its contents are of unknown source and accuracy, and clinicians should possess knowledge about the online information related to their field and contribute to the development of optimal medical videos.
Journal ArticleDOI

Medical YouTube Videos and Methods of Evaluation: Literature Review

TL;DR: A literature review to determine and compare the various methods used when analyzing YouTube videos for patient education efficacy, information accuracy, and quality found that overall, common steps were taken to evaluate the content.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Trends in Alternative Medicine Use in the United States, 1990-1997 Results of a Follow-up National Survey

TL;DR: Alternative medicine use and expenditures increased substantially between 1990 and 1997, attributable primarily to an increase in the proportion of the population seeking alternative therapies, rather than increased visits per patient.
Journal ArticleDOI

DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices.

TL;DR: While some subjectivity is required for rating certain criteria, the findings demonstrate that the instrument can be applied by experienced users and providers of health information to discriminate between publications of high and low quality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet: Caveant Lector et Viewor—Let the Reader and Viewer Beware

TL;DR: The problem is not too little information but too much, vast chunks of it incomplete, misleading, or inaccurate, and not only in the medical arena, the Net has the potential to become the world's largest vanity press.
Journal ArticleDOI

YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis.

TL;DR: The video ratings and view counts suggest the presence of a community of YouTube users critical of immunization, and the scientific claims made by the videos were classified as substantiated or unsubstantiated/contradicts.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information.

Gunther Eysenbach, +1 more
- 28 Nov 1998 - 
TL;DR: A common measure that could be proposed to solve the problem of quality of medical internet information should aim for the Hippocratic injunction “first, do no harm.”
Related Papers (5)