scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers on "Public international law published in 2010"


Book
24 May 2010
TL;DR: The seminal textbook on the law of international armed conflict as discussed by the authors has been thoroughly revised and updated, taking into account new developments in combat, numerous recent judicial cases (especially decisions rendered by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia), as well as topical studies and instruments.
Abstract: This is the seminal textbook on the law of international armed conflict, written by a leading commentator on the subject. The second edition has been thoroughly revised and updated, taking into account new developments in combat, numerous recent judicial cases (especially decisions rendered by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia), as well as topical studies and instruments. The text clarifies complex issues, offering solutions to practical combat dilemmas that have emerged in present-day battlefield situations. Several current (and controversial) subjects are examined in depth, including direct participation in hostilities, human shields, and air and missile warfare. Useful definitions and explanations have been added, making intricate problems easier to comprehend. The book is designed not only for students of international law, but also as a tool for the instruction of military officers.

355 citations


Book
06 May 2010
TL;DR: The International Criminal Court has been operational since mid-2003, following the entry into force of the Rome Statute of the international criminal court on 1 July 2002 as discussed by the authors, a combination of public international law, international humanitarian law and criminal law, both international and domestic.
Abstract: The International Criminal Court has been operational since mid-2003, following the entry into force of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court on 1 July 2002 The Rome Statute is among the most complex international treaties, a combination of public international law, international humanitarian law and criminal law, both international and domestic The Commentary provides an article-by-article analysis of the Statute Each of the 128 articles is presented accompanied by a bibliography of academic literature relevant to that provision, an overview of the drafting history of the provision and an analysis of the text The analytical portion of each chapter draws upon relevant case law from the Court itself, as well as from other international and national criminal tribunals, academic commentary, and the related instruments such as the Elements of Crimes, the Rules of Procedure and Evidence and the Relationship Agreement with the United Nations Written by a single author, the Commentary avoids duplication and inconsistency, providing a comprehensive presentation to assist those who must understand, interpret and apply the complex provisions of the Rome Statute

254 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the literature in four issues areas (security, war, and peace; international trade; protection of the environment; and human rights) and conclude that international law has a much stronger basis for assessing claims about compliance and violation now than was the case only a few years ago.
Abstract: International law has enjoyed a recent renaissance as an important subfield of study within international relations. Two trends are evident in the recent literature. First, the obsession with theoretical labels is on the decline. Second, empirical, especially quantitative, work is burgeoning. This article reviews the literature in four issues areas—security, war, and peace; international trade; protection of the environment; and human rights—and concludes we have a much stronger basis for assessing claims about compliance and violation now than was the case only a few years ago. Still, the literature suffers from a few weaknesses, including problems of selection and endogeneity of treaties themselves and an enduring state-centric focus, despite the fact that researchers recognize that nonstate and substate actors influence treaty behavior. Nonetheless, the quality and quantity of new work demonstrates that international law has regained an important place in the study of international politics.

240 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jan 2010

177 citations


Book
01 Apr 2010
TL;DR: The most up-to-date and comprehensive treatment of the philosophy of international law in existence can be found in this article, where the authors present a survey of the major works in this area.
Abstract: This volume is the most up-to-date and comprehensive treatment of the philosophy of international law in existence.

142 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors assess the promises and pitfalls of transnational actors' participation in global policymaking and assess the conditions for democracy in global governance through a combination of normative political theory and positive empirical research, finding considerable support for an optimistic verdict on the democratizing potential of trans-national actor involvement, but also identifying hurdles in democratic theory and the practice of global governance that motivate a more cautious outlook.
Abstract: The participation of transnational actors in global policymaking is increasingly seen as a means to democratize global governance. Drawing on alternative theories of democracy and existing empirical evidence, we assess the promises and pitfalls of this vision. We explore how the structuring and operation of international institutions, public-private partnerships, and transnational actors themselves may facilitate expanded participation and enhanced accountability in global governance. We find considerable support for an optimistic verdict on the democratizing potential of transnational actor involvement, but also identify hurdles in democratic theory and the practice of global governance that motivate a more cautious outlook. In conclusion, we call for research that explores the conditions for democracy in global governance through a combination of normative political theory and positive empirical research.

129 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The authors deconstruct the function of the Westphalian narrative to explain its pervasiveness and persistence, and argue that it was first developed by nineteenth century imperial international jurists and that the Eurocentric narrative perpetuates a Eurocentric bias in international relations theory, leading to misdiagnoses of major problems of contemporary international relations.
Abstract: In the past 10–15 years, an increasing number of revisionist scholars have rejected the most significant elements of the argument about the centrality of the Peace of Westphalia (1648) to the evolution and structure of international society. At the same time, the prominence of this argument has grown in the English School and constructivist international relations scholarship. I deconstruct the function of the Westphalian narrative to explain its pervasiveness and persistence. I argue that it was first developed by nineteenth century imperial international jurists and that the Westphalian narrative perpetuates a Eurocentric bias in international relations theory. This bias maintains that Westphalia created an international society, consolidating a normative divergence between European international relations and the rest of the international system. This dualism is predicated on the assumption that with Westphalia European states had solved the anarchy problem either through cultural or contractual evolution. Non-European states, lacking this European culture and social contract, remained in anarchy until the European states allowed them to join the international society—upon their achievement of the ‘‘standards of civilization.’’ This Westphalian narrative distorts the emergence of the modern international system and leads to misdiagnoses of major problems of contemporary international relations. Furthermore, their commitment to the Westphalian narrative prevents international relations scholars from adequately theorizing about international interdependencies and accommodating global pluralism.

123 citations


OtherDOI
29 Oct 2010
TL;DR: The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) is the emanation of equity in international environmental law as discussed by the authors, which has been a structuring element of environmental regimes, reflecting the division of the world between the global South and the global North.
Abstract: The principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) is the emanation of equity in international environmental law. It reflects the division of the world between the global South and the global North, which has been a structuring element of environmental regimes. This chapter explores the concept of differential treatment in international environmental law, its evolution and its implementation in environmental regimes. It then focuses specifically on CBDR and its recognition in environmental treaties. The next section discusses specifically CBDR in the climate change regime where it has been particularly important and controversial, and carries on by examining the continuing relevance of CBDR in the 2020s and the need for rethinking the ways in which it is implemented.

107 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article reviewed a series of policy options that have been proposed to fill the governance gap in international migration; namely, to create a new agency, to designate a lead agency, and to bring the International Organization for Migration into the UN system.
Abstract: This article explains how the global governance of international migration has evolved as a policy issue on the international agenda over the past decade while noting that there is still no consensus on whether global governance is really required, what type of global governance would be appropriate, and how it should develop. The article reviews a series of policy options that have been proposed to fill the governance gap in international migration; namely, to create a new agency, to designate a lead agency, to bring the International Organization for Migration into the UN system, a coordination model, a leadership model, a World Trade Organization model, and an evolutionary model.

107 citations


Book
22 Jul 2010
TL;DR: The work of the International Law Commission has been extensively studied in the literature as discussed by the authors, with a particular focus on the work on the law of international responsibility and its application in the field of international law.
Abstract: The law of international responsibility plays a fundamental role in the modern system of international law, surpassed by none and paralleled only by the law of treaties. The volume seeks to cover the entirety of the field of international responsibility, with a particular focus on the work of the International Law Commission. It provides detailed discussion and analysis of the historically predominant topics of State responsibility, on which the ILC completed its work in 2001, and the specific sub-topic of diplomatic protection, work on which was completed by the ILC in 2006. However, it also covers both the topic of responsibility of international organizations, on which the ILC's work is ongoing (a set of draft Articles having been adopted on first reading in 2009), and that of liability for harmful activities not prohibited under international law on which the ILC adopted drafts in 2001 and 2006.

Posted Content
TL;DR: The conceptual and more recently empirical study of compliance has become a central preoccupation, and perhaps the fastest growing sub-field, in international legal scholarship as mentioned in this paper, which leads to a tendency to oversimplify if not distort the relation of international law to politics.
Abstract: The conceptual, and more recently empirical, study of compliance has become a central preoccupation, and perhaps the fastest growing sub-field, in international legal scholarship. The authors seek to put in question this trend. They argue that looking at the aspirations of international law through the lens of rule-compliance leads to inadequate scrutiny and understanding of the diverse complex purposes and projects that multiple actors impose and transpose on international legality, and especially a tendency to oversimplify if not distort the relation of international law to politics. Citing a range of examples from different areas of international law-ranging widely from international trade and investment to international criminal and humanitarian law-the authors seek to show how the concept of compliance (especially viewed as rule-observance) is inadequate to understanding how international law has normative effects. A fundamental flaw of compliance studies is they abstract from the problem of interpretation: Interpretation is pervasively determinative of what happens to legal rules when they are out in the world yet “compliance” studies begin with the notion that there is a stable and agreed meaning to a rule, and we need merely observe whether it is obeyed.

Book
27 May 2010
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the possibility of self-defence against non-state actors in the International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) framework.
Abstract: Introduction PART I: THE INTER-STATE RELATIONSHIP: EXTRATERRITORIAL USE OF FORCE AND SELF-DEFENCE AGAINST NON-STATE ACTORS 1. The Possibility of Self-Defence Against Non-State Actors 2. The Parameters of Self-Defence 3. Measures Taken Outside the Self-Defence Framework Part I Conclusion PART II: INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW 4. Force Against Non-State Actors as Armed Conflict 5. Non-Traditional Models of Armed Conflict 6. Status of Individuals and the Regulation of Force Part II Conclusion PART III: INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW 7. The Principal Practices and Primarily Affected Rights 8. Extraterritorial Applicability of Human Rights Law 9. Concurrent Applicability of International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law Part III Conclusion Concluding Chapter

Book
25 Nov 2010
TL;DR: In this article, the methodological debate and the quest for custom have been discussed, and conditions of self-defence have been defined, and the future for the armed attack criterion has been discussed.
Abstract: Introduction 1 The methodological debate and the quest for custom 2 Conditions of self-defence 3 The Armed Attack Requirement Ratione Materiae 4 The Armed Attack Requirement Ratione Temporis 5 The Armed Attack Requirement Ratione Personae 6 What future for the armed attack criterion?

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: The Decisions of the World Court Relevant to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as mentioned in this paper contains a reference guide to the internal waters, territorial sea and baselines.
Abstract: This section of the book Decisions of the World Court Relevant to the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea contains a reference guide to the internal waters, territorial sea and baselines. It also contains a reference to mouth of rivers, bays, ports and roadsteads, criminal jurisdiction, and straits used for international navigation. The law of the sea related cases have continued to feature prominently in the voluminous annals of the World Court ever since the 1923 S.S. Wimbledon and the 1948-1949 Corfu Channel (UK/Albania) Judgments, which inaugurated the contentious jurisprudence of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) and its successor, the International Court Of Justice (ICJ) by cases that arose out of incidents involving vessels and that have proven to have far-reaching implications for navigational rights and freedoms.Keywords: criminal jurisdiction; International Court of Justice (ICJ); Law of the Sea; UN Convention

Book
15 Jul 2010
TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss the role of the secretary-general in the United Nations, and the relationship between the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, as well as the conditions for success in peace-kepping operations.
Abstract: Part 1 Decision-Making: The Framework for Inquiry, R. Cox and H. Jacobson The Role of the Secretary-General, J. Perez de Cuillar How Nations Vote in the General Assembly of the United Nations, M. Marin-Bosch. Part 2 Peace and Security Issues: Why NATO is Still the Best - Future Security Arrangements for Europe, C. Glaser The Conditions for Success in Peacekepping Operations, P.F. Diehl Second-Generation Multinational Operations, J. Mackinlay and J. Chopra. Part 3 Economic Issues: What the Third World Wants - An Interpretation of the Development and Meaning of the New International Economic Order Ideology, C. Murphy The Changing Relationship Between the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, R. Feinberg. Part 4 Social and Humanitarian Issues: Human Rights - Amnesty International and the United Nations, R. Thakur Who Governs the Rome Food Agencies?, R. Talbot and H.W. Moyer Strengthening Compliance with International Environmental Accords - Preliminary Observations From a Collaborative Project, H. Jacobson and E.B. Weiss NGOs, the UN and Humanitarian Relief, A. Natsios. Part 5 Regional Organisations: The New Latin America and the Inter-American Development Bank, E. Iglesias. Part 6 International Organisations and the Future: Empowering the United Nations, B. Boutros-Ghali The Limits of International Organisation-Systems Failures in the Management of International Relations, G. Gallarotti.

Book
01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: In this paper, Bernstorff and Smrkolj have developed the publicness of public international law and developed a legal framework for Global Governance Activities, from public international Law to international public law.
Abstract: Concept.- Developing the Publicness of Public International Law: Towards a Legal Framework for Global Governance Activities.- From Public International Law to International Public Law: A Comment on the #x201C Public Authority#x201D of International Institutions and the #x201C Publicness#x201D of their Law.- To Tame and to Frame.- International Bureaucracies from a Political Science Perspective #x2013 Agency, Authority and International Institutional Law.- Thematic Studies: The Exercise of Public Authority through Instruments Concerning Indivduals - Decisions.- The UN Security Council Al-Qaida and Taliban Sanctions Committee: Emerging Principles of International Institutional Law for the Protection of Individuals?.- WIPO#x2019 s International Registration of Trademarks: An International Administrative Act Subject to Examination by the Designated Contracting Parties.- International Institutions and Individualized Decision-Making: An Example of UNHCR#x2019 s Refugee Status Determination.- Thematic Studies: The Exercise of Public Authority through Instruments Concerning Indivduals - Recommendations.- Effective Governance through Decentralized Soft Implementation: The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.- Thematic Studies: The Exercise of Public Authority through Instruments Concerning Indivduals - Information.- The Administration of Information in International Administrative Law #x2013 The Example of Interpol.- Thematic Studies: The Exercise of Public Authority through Instruments Concerning Indivdual States - Decisions.- Flexibility and Legitimacy #x2014 The Emissions Trading System under the Kyoto Protocol.- The UNESCO Regime for the Protection of World Heritage as Prototype of an Autonomy-Gaining International Institution.- The UNESCO Regime for the Protection of World Heritage.- Thematic Studies: The Exercise of Public Authority through Instruments Concerning Indivdual States - Recommendations.- Regulating Minority Issues through Standard-Setting and Mediation: The Case of the High Commissioner on National Minorities.- Thematic Studies: The Exercise of Public Authority through Instruments Concerning Indivdual States - Information.- Governance through Promotion and Persuasion: The 1998 ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work.- The WTO Committee on Trade in Financial Services: The Exercise of Public Authority within an Informational Forum.- The Exercise of Public Authority through General Instruments: Secondary Law.- The Administration of the Vocabulary of International Trade: The Adaptation of WTO Schedules to Changes in the Harmonized System.- Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) #x2013 Conservation Efforts Undermine the Legality Principle.- The Exercise of Public Authority through General Instruments: International Public Standards.- Legal Challenges of Non-binding Instruments: The Case of the FAO Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries.- Why Would International Administrative Activity Be Any Less Legitimate? #x2014 A Study of the Codex Alimentarius Commission.- The Exercise of Public Authority through General Instruments: Public Authority through Private Law Instruments.- ICANN #x2013 Governance by Technical Necessity.- International Administration of Holocaust Compensation: The International Commission on Holocaust Era Insurance Claims (ICHEIC).- Cross-Cutting Analyses.- Inside Relative Normativity: From Sources to Standard Instruments for the Exercise of International Public Authority.- Goldmann Variations.- General Principles of International Public Authority: Sketching a Research Field.- Is There a Global Administrative Law?.- Procedures of Decision-Making and the Role of Law in International Organizations.- The Contributions by Jochen von Bernstorff and by Maja Smrkolj.- The Enforcement Authority of International Institutions.- The Enforcement Authority of International Institutions #x2013 Some Remarks and Suggestions for Further Analysis.- Holding International Institutions Accountable: The Complementary Role of Non-Judicial Oversight Mechanisms and Judicial Review.- International Composite Administration: Conceptualizing Multi-Level and Network Aspects in the Exercise of International Public Authority.- International Composite Administration.- Legitimacy of International Law and the Exercise of Administrative Functions: The Example of the International Seabed Authority, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and International Fisheries Organizations.- Context.- The Internationalization of Administrative Relations as a Challenge for Administrative Law Scholarship.- Procedural Due Process of Law Beyond the State.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The International Labour Conference adopted the Convention No. 169 Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries, which came into force on 5 September 1991 as mentioned in this paper, and remains the only modern international legally binding instrument containing a series of novel provisions specifically devoted to the rights of indigenous peoples with a view to recognizing, protecting and promoting their distinct identity.
Abstract: On 27 June 1989, by a majority of 328 votes for, one against and 49 abstentions, the International Labour Conference adopted the Convention No. 169 Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries, which came into force on 5 September 1991. Twenty years later, the Convention remains the only modern international legally binding instrument containing a series of novel provisions specifically devoted to the rights of indigenous peoples with a view to recognising, protecting and promoting their distinct identity. Despite its shortcomings and its few ratifications (just 20), the Convention has proved to be a significant departure for the defence and strengthening of indigenous rights at national, regional (especially that of Latin America) and universal level.

Book
11 Jan 2010
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors present a comprehensive theory of customary international law that can effectively resolve the enigmas, both conceptual and practical, of the subject of international law, including how to determine the existence of opinio juris, the function of the state practice requirement, the definition of jus cogens customary norms, and the relationship between international law and ethics.
Abstract: Customary international law, although long recognized as a primary source of international law, remains replete with enigmas, both conceptual and practical. These include how to determine the existence of opinio juris, the function of the state practice requirement, the definition of jus cogens customary norms, and the relationship between customary international law and ethics. In part because of these enigmas, the subject has generated a wide-ranging literature. However, no recent book-length work has attempted to articulate a comprehensive theory of customary international law that can effectively resolve these questions. This book sets out to accomplish this goal. Its approach is unique in a number of ways. For example, it is multidisciplinary and draws insights from fields such as legal theory, philosophy, political science, and game theory. In addition, it is anchored in a sophisticated ethical framework and explores at length the interconnections between customary international law and ethics.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In a recent special issue of Global Governance on international migration as mentioned in this paper, the authors present some of the key facts, figures, concepts, and debates on International Migration that appear in the articles that follow, and outlines their main arguments.
Abstract: This article serves as the introduction for this special issue of Global Governance on international migration. It presents some of the key facts, figures, concepts, and debates on international migration that appear in the articles that follow, and outlines their main arguments. Five arguments in support of greater international cooperation and more formal processes of global governance on international migration are presented here. First, contemporary international migration is now occurring at unprecedented levels and has a truly global reach. Second, international migration can no longer effectively be managed or controlled by national migration policies, and greater international cooperation is required to achieve national goals in international migration. Third, there are growing numbers of migrants around the world who are vulnerable and exploited, and insufficiently protected by either states or international institutions. Fourth, emerging structural features in the global economy, alongside the effects of climate change, are likely to significantly increase the scale of international migration worldwide, and present new management and protection challenges. Finally, momentum for change is slowly developing. KEYWORDS: international migration, global governance. ********** IN CONTRAST TO MANY OTHER CROSS-BORDER ISSUES OF OUR TIME, SUCH as trade, finance, or the environment, international migration lacks a coherent institutional framework at the global level. There is no UN migration organization; rather there is a network of intergovernmental organizations within and outside the UN that focus on specific aspects of international migration. States remain the principal actors in migration governance, and delegate responsibility to regional organizations or international institutions in only limited circumstances. The legal and normative framework affecting international migrants cannot be found in a single document, but is derived from customary law, a variety of binding global and regional legal instruments, nonbinding agreements, and policy understandings reached by states at the global and regional level. Many elements of this framework are not migration specific, but address broader questions of individual rights, state responsibility, and interstate relations. Only in the area of refugee movements, and more recently migrant smuggling and human trafficking, have a large number of governments agreed to binding international laws and norms, but even in these areas implementation remains a challenge. (1) The reluctance of most states to yield national control over international migration is understandable. Sovereign states have the right--indeed, the responsibility--to determine who enters and remains on their territory. And international migration can also impact on other essential aspects of state sovereignty, including economic competitiveness, national and public security, and social cohesion. In addition, some of the challenges to more effective international cooperation on international migration at times can appear insurmountable. In particular, it pits developed economies that want to protect national labor markets and admit migrant workers on only a selective basis against developing countries with rapidly expanding and youthful populations that demand greater and more unrestricted access to those labor markets. At least some of the responsibility for slow progress in developing more global governance on international migration also lies with existing international institutions that are unable or unwilling to extend their mandates, often enter into competition with one another when they do, and fail to cooperate on even the most basic of issues such as common terminology or shared access to data on migration. What is more, even among advocates for reform, there is little consensus on how far-reaching the changes should be. Ambitions range from more effective regional cooperation, through more coherent global cooperation, to the development of a new legal and normative framework and new institutional arrangements to deliver the reforms. …

MonographDOI
Yasuaki Onuma1
05 Jul 2010
TL;DR: Onuma as mentioned in this paper argues that international law should be interpreted from a trans-civilizational perspective as well, not only from a prevalent Statecentric international perspective and West-centric transnational perspective.
Abstract: Also available as an e-book The twenty-first century will witness conflicts which may destabilize the international order. These conflicts are likely to arise between emerging Asian States such as China and India whose material power is growing, and the Western nations who wield significant ideational power. A West-centric international society will change to a multi-polar and multi-civilizational global society. This structural change includes, and further needs, changes of understandings and perceptions of the world, including of international law. The perspectives from which we see, understand, appreciate and assess international law must change. We need to interpret international law not only from a prevalent Statecentric international perspective and West-centric transnational perspective. Onuma argues that we must grasp international law from what he calls a trans-civilizational perspective as well. By adopting such three-layered perspectives, international law is shown to be functioning as a tool of politics yet constrained by cultural and civilizational factors. Such complex subjects as global history of international law, concepts of general and customary international law, and human rights could be appreciated in a more nuanced and subtle manner.



Journal ArticleDOI
Adriaan Bedner1
TL;DR: In this article, the authors propose a conceptual framework to deal with the problem of agreement on the definition of the concept of the rule of law, and propose three types of elements: procedural elements, substantive elements and control mechanisms.
Abstract: The past ten years have seen an avalanche of literature on the rule of law, but little agreement on a definition of the concept — if it is defined at all. The present article offers a conceptual framework to deal with this situation. Departing from the two main functions the rule of law intends to serve — protecting citizens against the state and against one another — it dissects the various definitions in use into elements. These elements are discussed one by one and arranged in three categories: procedural elements, substantive elements and control mechanisms.

Book
28 Oct 2010
TL;DR: In this paper, the role of the international legal scholar in Kelsenian formalism in international law is discussed, and an "objective" architecture of international law: Kelsen, Kunz, and Verdross is presented.
Abstract: 1. Method and construction of international law in nineteenth century German scholarship 2. Kelsenian formalism as critical methodology in international law 3. An 'objective' architecture of international law: Kelsen, Kunz, and Verdross 4. The new actors of universal law 5. Legal sources as universal instruments of law creation 6. The international judiciary as the functional center of universal law 7. The role of the international legal scholar in Kelsen - a concluding reflection Epilogue. On Kelsenian formalism in international law.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, international financial law is compared to international trade and monetary law, and the authors highlight important structural deficiencies that the World Trade Organization, a more mature legal regime, largely avoids.
Abstract: International financial law is in many ways a peculiar instrument of global economic affairs. Unlike international trade and monetary affairs, where global coordination is directed through formal international organizations, international financial law arises through inter-agency institutions with ambiguous legal status. Furthermore, the commitments made by regulatory officials participating in such forums are non-binding. This divergence is perplexing, especially when comparing international financial law to international trade. Both trade and finance comprise key areas of 'international economic law' and their rules have important distributive consequences for global markets and market participants. This article suggests that in order to understand soft law's value as a coordinating mechanism, an institutional assessment of the way that law is enforced is necessary. Under close inspection, international financial law departs from traditional public international law notions of informality and can in fact be 'harder' than its soft-law quality suggests. This feature helps explain why international financial rules, though technically non-binding, are often relied upon. The predominance of international soft law in finance does not, however, imply that it is without flaws, and this article highlights important structural deficiencies that the World Trade Organization, a more mature legal regime, largely avoids. Oxford University Press 2010, all rights reserved, Oxford University Press.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyze the most important questions that these maritime operations of FRONTEX raise, analysing them through the lens of the law of the sea and other rules of corpus juris gentium, while focusing on the relevance of other international rules like the use of force or the principle of non-refoulement to the present context.
Abstract: It is true that the problem of interception of human beings on the high seas is more acute than ever, not only in terms of the number of vessels intercepted but also in terms of the variety of legal issues that it raises. The most worrisome observation, however, is that while interception of human beings has been practiced for centuries, currently the pendulum has swung from interception to free and save lives, for example, in the context of chattel slavery, to interception to prevent people from entering developed States and claiming a better future. This is particularly reflected in the practice of EU Member States, which have taken many initiatives in the maritime domain to strengthen the external borders of 'fortress' Europe. Lately, this practice is coordinated by a European Agency, commonly referred to as FRONTEX, which was established in 2004 in order to "coordinate the operational cooperation between Member States in the field of external borders management". To this end, FRONTEX has launched a number of maritime interdiction operations carried out on the high seas and even further, i.e. in the territorial seas of States of departure or transit, such as Mauritania, Senegal, Cape Verde. The purpose of this article is to address the most important questions that these maritime operations of FRONTEX raise, analysing them through the lens of the law of the sea and other rules of corpus juris gentium . Accordingly, in the first part there will be a thorough discussion of the pertinent legal bases of the interception operations on the high seas and in the territorial waters, while in the second the analysis will focus more on the relevance of other international rules like the use of force or the principle of non-refoulement to the present context. The application of the latter principle appears to be especially problematic in the majority of these operations since it is very likely that the persons onboard the intercepted vessels would be forced to return to their countries of origin, where they may be subjected to torture or inhuman or degrading treatment.

Posted Content
TL;DR: In this article, the standards applicable to investigations of violations of international humanitarian law during an armed conflict are examined, in addition to considering the IHL and HR provisions on the subject, and the practices of the US, Canada, UK and Australia.
Abstract: The article examines the standards applicable to investigations of violations of international humanitarian law during an armed conflict. In addition to considering the IHL and HR provisions on the subject, it examines the practices of the US, Canada, UK and Australia.

Book ChapterDOI
01 Jan 2010
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the role of the individual in the international legal system and argue that individuals are participants in that system, and are not solely objects that are subject to States' consent.
Abstract: This chapter examines the role of the individual in the international legal system. It considers the direct rights and responsibilities of individuals under the international legal system; their capacity to bring international claims; and their ability to participate in the creation, development, and enforcement of international law. Particular examples from a wide range of areas of international law, including international human rights law, international criminal law, and international economic law, are used to illustrate the conceptual and practical participation of individuals in the international legal system. It is argued that individuals are participants in that system, and are not solely objects that are subject to States’ consent, though their degree of participation varies depending on the changing nature of the international legal system.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in several areas of adjudication which initially did not fall under the instrument, such as environmental rights, international humanitarian law, and investors' rights.
Abstract: The article examines the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in several areas of adjudication which initially did not fall under the instrument, such as environmental rights, international humanitarian law, and investors� rights. In all these areas, the Court has used instruments �foreign� to the Inter-American system as a means to expand the content of rights in the American Convention. As a result, the umbrella of protection of this instrument, and the reach of the Court, is far greater than originally envisaged. After analysing the specific provision on interpretation of the American Convention on Human Rights as compared to the equivalent mechanisms in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, the article analyses several case studies of expansionism in the case law of the Court, asking throughout the analysis the question whether this helps the unity or the fragmentation of international law. The article argues that this exercise in expansionism, albeit imperfect, eventually contributes to the unity of international law. In this sense, this expansionism happens within controlled boundaries, and the use of external instruments is more of a validation of findings the Court could make based solely on the Inter-American instruments, rarely creating new rights.