Despite decades of research, efforts to directly target KRAS have been challenging. MRTX849 was identified as a potent, selective, and covalent KRASG12C inhibitor that exhibits favorable drug-like properties, selectively modifies mutant cysteine 12 in GDP-bound KRASG12C and inhibits KRAS-dependent signaling. MRTX849 demonstrated pronounced tumor regression in 17 of 26 (65%) of KRASG12C-positive cell line- and patient-derived xenograft models from multiple tumor types and objective responses have been observed in KRASG12C-positive lung and colon adenocarcinoma patients. Comprehensive pharmacodynamic and pharmacogenomic profiling in sensitive and partially resistant non-clinical models identified mechanisms implicated in limiting anti-tumor activity including KRAS nucleotide cycling and pathways that induce feedback reactivation and/or bypass KRAS dependence. These factors included activation of RTKs, bypass of KRAS dependence, and genetic dysregulation of cell cycle. Combinations of MRTX849 with agents that target RTKs, mTOR, or cell cycle demonstrated enhanced response and marked tumor regression in several tumor models, including MRTX849-refractory models.

/pdf/the-krasg12c-inhibitor-mrtx849-provides-insight-toward-4ks6xod5u0.pdf

The KRASG12C Inhibitor, MRTX849, Provides Insight Toward Therapeutic Susceptibility of KRAS Mutant Cancers in Mouse Models and Patients

RAS (KRAS, NRAS and HRAS) is the most frequently mutated gene family in cancers, and, consequently, investigators have sought an effective RAS inhibitor for more than three decades. Even 10 years ago, RAS inhibitors were so elusive that RAS was termed ‘undruggable’. Now, with the success of allele-specific covalent inhibitors against the most frequently mutated version of RAS in non-small-cell lung cancer, KRASG12C, we have the opportunity to evaluate the best therapeutic strategies to treat RAS-driven cancers. Mutation-specific biochemical properties, as well as the tissue of origin, are likely to affect the effectiveness of such treatments. Currently, direct inhibition of mutant RAS through allele-specific inhibitors provides the best therapeutic approach. Therapies that target RAS-activating pathways or RAS effector pathways could be combined with these direct RAS inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors or T cell-targeting approaches to treat RAS-mutant tumours. Here we review recent advances in therapies that target mutant RAS proteins and discuss the future challenges of these therapies, including combination strategies. RAS proteins, which are frequently altered in cancer, were once considered undruggable, but compounds targeting some mutant RAS proteins have recently demonstrated clinical efficacy. In this Review, Malek and colleagues explore how these and other drugs that target RAS or associated pathways might be used effectively, particularly in combinations, and discuss other RAS-targeted therapies in the pipeline.

RAS-targeted therapies: is the undruggable drugged?

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly devastating disease with poor prognosis and rising incidence. Late detection and a particularly aggressive biology are the major challenges which determine therapeutic failure. In this review, we present the current status and the recent advances in PDAC treatment together with the biological and immunological hallmarks of this cancer entity. On this basis, we discuss new concepts combining distinct treatment modalities in order to improve therapeutic efficacy and clinical outcome – with a specific focus on protocols involving radio(chemo)therapeutic approaches.

/pdf/pancreatic-ductal-adenocarcinoma-biological-hallmarks-476n4ty8hw.pdf

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: biological hallmarks, current status, and future perspectives of combined modality treatment approaches

RAS mutations are frequent in human cancer, especially in pancreatic, colorectal and non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs)1-3. Inhibition of the RAS oncoproteins has proven difficult4, and attempts to target downstream effectors5-7 have been hampered by the activation of compensatory resistance mechanisms8. It is also well established that KRAS-mutant tumors are insensitive to inhibition of upstream growth factor receptor signaling. Thus, epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy is only effective in KRAS wild-type colon cancers9,10. Consistently, inhibition of SHP2 (also known as PTPN11), which links receptor tyrosine kinase signaling to the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway11,12, was shown to be ineffective in KRAS-mutant or BRAF-mutant cancer cell lines13. Our data also indicate that SHP2 inhibition in KRAS-mutant NSCLC cells under normal cell culture conditions has little effect. By contrast, SHP2 inhibition under growth factor-limiting conditions in vitro results in a senescence response. In vivo, inhibition of SHP2 in KRAS-mutant NSCLC also provokes a senescence response, which is exacerbated by MEK inhibition. Our data identify SHP2 inhibition as an unexpected vulnerability of KRAS-mutant NSCLC cells that remains undetected in cell culture and can be exploited therapeutically.

SHP2 is required for growth of KRAS-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer in vivo.

Purpose: Although KRASrepresents the most commonly mutated oncogene, it has long been considered an "undruggable" target. Novel covalent inhibitors selective for the KRASG12Cmutation offer the unprecedented opportunity to target KRAS directly. However, prior efforts to target the RAS-MAPK pathway have been hampered by adaptive feedback, which drives pathway reactivation and resistance. 
Experimental Design: A panel of KRASG12Ccell lines were treated with the KRASG12Cinhibitors ARS-1620 and AMG 510 to assess effects on signaling and viability. Isoform-specific pulldown of activated GTP-bound RAS was performed to evaluate effects on the activity of specific RAS isoforms over time following treatment. RTK inhibitors, SHP2 inhibitors, and MEK/ERK inhibitors were assessed in combination with KRASG12Cinhibitors in vitro and in vivo as potential strategies to overcome resistance and enhance efficacy.
Results: We observed rapid adaptive RAS pathway feedback reactivation following KRASG12Cinhibition in the majority of KRASG12Cmodels, driven by RTK-mediated activation of wild type RAS, which cannot be inhibited by G12C-specific inhibitors. Importantly, multiple RTKs can mediate feedback, with no single RTK appearing critical across all KRASG12Cmodels. However, co-inhibition of SHP2, which mediates signaling from multiple RTKs to RAS, abrogated feedback reactivation more universally, and combined KRASG12C/SHP2 inhibition drove sustained RAS pathway suppression and improved efficacy in vitro and in vivo.
Conclusions: These data identify feedback reactivation of wild type RAS as a key mechanism of adaptive resistance to KRASG12Cinhibitors and highlight the potential importance of vertical inhibition strategies to enhance the clinical efficacy of KRASG12Cinhibitors.

/pdf/vertical-pathway-inhibition-overcomes-adaptive-feedback-2na4f2h84w.pdf

Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition.

The ubiquitously expressed non-receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2, encoded by PTPN11, is involved in signal transduction downstream of multiple growth factor, cytokine and integrin receptors1. Its requirement for complete RAS-MAPK activation and its role as a negative regulator of JAK-STAT signaling have established SHP2 as an essential player in oncogenic signaling pathways1-7. Recently, a novel potent allosteric SHP2 inhibitor was presented as a viable therapeutic option for receptor tyrosine kinase-driven cancers, but was shown to be ineffective in KRAS-mutant tumor cell lines in vitro8. Here, we report a central and indispensable role for SHP2 in oncogenic KRAS-driven tumors. Genetic deletion of Ptpn11 profoundly inhibited tumor development in mutant KRAS-driven murine models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. We provide evidence for a critical dependence of mutant KRAS on SHP2 during carcinogenesis. Deletion or inhibition of SHP2 in established tumors delayed tumor progression but was not sufficient to achieve tumor regression. However, SHP2 was necessary for resistance mechanisms upon blockade of MEK. Synergy was observed when both SHP2 and MEK were targeted, resulting in sustained tumor growth control in murine and human patient-derived organoids and xenograft models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and non-small-cell lung cancer. Our data indicate the clinical utility of dual SHP2/MEK inhibition as a targeted therapy approach for KRAS-mutant cancers.

/pdf/mutant-kras-driven-cancers-depend-on-ptpn11-shp2-phosphatase-dnyvb1zln2.pdf

Angeliki Faidra Karpathaki

Papers

Mutant KRAS -driven cancers depend on PTPN11 /SHP2 phosphatase

Levels of the Autophagy-Related 5 Protein Affect Progression and Metastasis of Pancreatic Tumors in Mice.