Transporter-facilitated uptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine or 5-HT) has been implicated in anxiety in humans and animal models and is the site of action of widely used uptake-inhibiting antidepressant and antianxiety drugs. Human 5-HT transporter (5-HTT) gene transcription is modulated by a common polymorphism in its upstream regulatory region. The short variant of the polymorphism reduces the transcriptional efficiency of the 5-HTT gene promoter, resulting in decreased 5-HTT expression and 5-HT uptake in lymphoblasts. Association studies in two independent samples totaling 505 individuals revealed that the 5-HTT polymorphism accounts for 3 to 4 percent of total variation and 7 to 9 percent of inherited variance in anxiety-related personality traits in individuals as well as sibships.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/274/5292/1527.full.pdf

Association of Anxiety-Related Traits with a Polymorphism in the Serotonin Transporter Gene Regulatory Region

Flavonoids are nearly ubiquitous in plants and are recognized as the pigments responsible for the colors of leaves, especially in autumn. They are rich in seeds, citrus fruits, olive oil, tea, and red wine. They are low molecular weight compounds composed of a three-ring structure with various substitutions. This basic structure is shared by tocopherols (vitamin E). Flavonoids can be subdivided according to the presence of an oxy group at position 4, a double bond between carbon atoms 2 and 3, or a hydroxyl group in position 3 of the C (middle) ring. These characteristics appear to also be required for best activity, especially antioxidant and antiproliferative, in the systems studied. The particular hydroxylation pattern of the B ring of the flavonoles increases their activities, especially in inhibition of mast cell secretion. Certain plants and spices containing flavonoids have been used for thousands of years in traditional Eastern medicine. In spite of the voluminous literature available, however, Western medicine has not yet used flavonoids therapeutically, even though their safety record is exceptional. Suggestions are made where such possibilities may be worth pursuing.

The Effects of Plant Flavonoids on Mammalian Cells:Implications for Inflammation, Heart Disease, and Cancer

### A. Overview

Extracellular purines (adenosine, ADP, and ATP) and pyrimidines (UDP and UTP) are important signaling molecules that mediate diverse biological effects via cell-surface receptors termed purine receptors. In this review particular emphasis is placed on the discrepancy between the

/pdf/receptors-for-purines-and-pyrimidines-56f78tnpew.pdf

Receptors for Purines and Pyrimidines

Microglial cells are the resident macrophages in the central nervous system. These cells of mesodermal/mesenchymal origin migrate into all regions of the central nervous system, disseminate through the brain parenchyma, and acquire a specific ramified morphological phenotype termed "resting microglia." Recent studies indicate that even in the normal brain, microglia have highly motile processes by which they scan their territorial domains. By a large number of signaling pathways they can communicate with macroglial cells and neurons and with cells of the immune system. Likewise, microglial cells express receptors classically described for brain-specific communication such as neurotransmitter receptors and those first discovered as immune cell-specific such as for cytokines. Microglial cells are considered the most susceptible sensors of brain pathology. Upon any detection of signs for brain lesions or nervous system dysfunction, microglial cells undergo a complex, multistage activation process that converts them into the "activated microglial cell." This cell form has the capacity to release a large number of substances that can act detrimental or beneficial for the surrounding cells. Activated microglial cells can migrate to the site of injury, proliferate, and phagocytose cells and cellular compartments.

Physiology of Microglia

Publisher Summary Studies of cytotoxicity by human lymphocytes revealed not only that both allogeneic and syngeneic tumor cells were lysed in a non-MHC-restricted fashion, but also that lymphocytes from normal donors were often cytotoxic. Lymphocytes from any healthy donor, as well as peripheral blood and spleen lymphocytes from several experimental animals, in the absence of known or deliberate sensitization, were found to be spontaneously cytotoxic in vitro for some normal fresh cells, most cultured cell lines, immature hematopoietic cells, and tumor cells. This type of nonadaptive, non-MHC-restricted cellmediated cytotoxicity was defined as “natural” cytotoxicity, and the effector cells mediating natural cytotoxicity were functionally defined as natural killer (NK) cells. The existence of NK cells has prompted a reinterpretation of both the studies of specific cytotoxicity against spontaneous human tumors and the theory of immune surveillance, at least in its most restrictive interpretation. Unlike cytotoxic T cells, NK cells cannot be demonstrated to have clonally distributed specificity, restriction for MHC products at the target cell surface, or immunological memory. NK cells cannot yet be formally assigned to a single lineage based on the definitive identification of a stem cell, a distinct anatomical location of maturation, or unique genotypic rearrangements.

Biology of natural killer cells.

Four adenosine receptors have been cloned and characterized from several mammalian species. The receptors are named adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B), and A(3). The A(2A) and A(2B) receptors preferably interact with members of the G(s) family of G proteins and the A(1) and A(3) receptors with G(i/o) proteins. However, other G protein interactions have also been described. Adenosine is the preferred endogenous agonist at all these receptors, but inosine can also activate the A(3) receptor. The levels of adenosine seen under basal conditions are sufficient to cause some activation of all the receptors, at least where they are abundantly expressed. Adenosine levels during, e.g., ischemia can activate all receptors even when expressed in low abundance. Accordingly, experiments with receptor antagonists and mice with targeted disruption of adenosine A(1), A(2A), and A(3) expression reveal roles for these receptors under physiological and particularly pathophysiological conditions. There are pharmacological tools that can be used to classify A(1), A(2A), and A(3) receptors but few drugs that interact selectively with A(2B) receptors. Testable models of the interaction of these drugs with their receptors have been generated by site-directed mutagenesis and homology-based modelling. Both agonists and antagonists are being developed as potential drugs.

https://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/content/pharmrev/53/4/527.full.pdf

International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors

Caffeine is the most widely consumed behaviorally active substance in the world. Almost all caffeine comes from dietary sources (beverages and food), most of it from coffee and tea. Acute and, especially, chronic caffeine intake appear to have only minor negative consequences on health. For this

Actions of Caffeine in the Brain with Special Reference to Factors That Contribute to Its Widespread Use

“Receptors recognize a distinct chemical entity and translate information from that entity into a form that the cell can read to alter its state” (Kenakin et al., 1992). Even though the receptors are often pharmacologically defined on the basis of synthetic compounds, they are assumed to have developed to respond to endogenous molecules. Therefore, receptors are generally named on the basis of their natural ligands. Hence, it is appropriate to very briefly summarize the evidence that purine nucleotides and nucleosides are natural ligands for a wide class of receptors.

In a seminal paper, Drury and Szent-Gyorgyi (1929) showed that adenosine exerted a large number of biological effects, including bradycardia and vasodilation. A wider interest in the role of adenosine followed from the demonstration in 1963 that adenosine can be produced by the hypoxic heart. Two groups independently formulated the hypothesis that adenosine may be involved in the metabolic regulation of coronary blood flow (Berne, 1963; Gerlach et al., 1963). The observation by de Gubareff and Sleator (1965) that the actions of adenosine in heart tissue could be blocked by caffeine suggested the existence of an adenosine receptor. The potent cardiovascular effects of adenosine led to an interest in the synthesis of new adenosine analogs, and careful dose-response studies with a number of these drugs (Cobbin et al., 1974) strongly suggested the presence of a receptor for adenosine-like compounds. Sattin and Rall (1970) reported that adenosine increased cyclic AMP accumulation in slices of rodent brain and that this adenosine-induced second-messenger response was blocked by methylxanthines. Their findings suggested that adenosine receptors exist in the central nervous system. The essentially simultaneous findings by Mcilwain (1972), that such brain slices actually elaborate adenosine in concentrations that would be sufficient to elevate cyclic AMP, provided support that these putative receptors were physiologically occupied by adenosine. Thus, in the 1970s there was good evidence that there were receptors for adenosine at which methylxanthines acted as antagonists. Biochemical evidence for the existence of multiple adenosine receptors was subsequently provided by the demonstration that adenosine analogs increased cyclic AMP production in some preparations and decreased it in others. Because the relative agonist potency for a variety of adenosine analogs was different for these two types of effects, the presence of two classes of receptors, called A1 and A2 (van Calker et al., 1979) or Ri and Ra (Londos et al., 1980), was proposed. The A1/A2 nomenclature is now generally used.

The presence of receptors for ADP, particularly on blood platelets, was also recognized several decades ago. Studies of the factors in blood that induce platelet aggregation led to the identification of ADP as an active component present in red blood cell extracts (Gaarder et al., 1961). The evidence that ADP and adenosine (presumably A2) receptors exist on platelets was summarized by Haslam and Cusack (1981).

Four decades ago, ATP was shown to produce important cardiovascular effects (Green and Stoner, 1950) and to be released from sensory nerves (Holton and Holton, 1954; Holton, 1959), hinting at a role in neural transmission. In his landmark review of purinergic nerves, Burnstock (1972) postulated the existence of specific ATP receptors. Although evidence in support of this idea was not overwhelming at the time, many subsequent studies have supported the existence of receptors for extracellular ATP (Burnstock and Brown, 1981; Gordon, 1986; O’Connor et al., 1991). Similarly, the evidence is now compelling that ATP plays important physiological and/ or pathophysiological roles in a variety of biological systems, including that of a neurotransmitter in peripheral and central neurons. Finally, diadenosinetetraphosphate is a dinucleotide stored in synaptic vesicles and chromaffin granules (Flodgaard and Klenow, 1982; Rodriguez del Castillo et al., 1988) and released therefrom (Pintor et al., 1991a, 1992). The purine dinucleotide also binds with subnanomolar affinity to receptors (Pintor et al., 1991b, 1993) and exerts biological effects (Pintor et al., 1993), indicating that it is an endogenous purinoceptor ligand.

Thus, strong evidence for the presence of receptors for the endogenous ligands adenosine, ADP, ATP, and dia-denosinetetraphosphate had accumulated. This group of receptors is called the purinoceptors. If at some future time there is compelling evidence that UTP, or another pyrimidine nucleotide, is an endogenous ligand at receptors that respond poorly or not at all to ATP, then this terminology may need revision.

https://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/content/pharmrev/46/2/143.full.pdf

Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors

In the 10 years since our previous International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology report on the nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors, no developments have led to major changes in the recommendations. However, there have been so many other developments that an update is needed. The fact that the structure of one of the adenosine receptors has recently been solved has already led to new ways of in silico screening of ligands. The evidence that adenosine receptors can form homo- and heteromultimers has accumulated, but the functional significance of such complexes remains unclear. The availability of mice with genetic modification of all the adenosine receptors has led to a clarification of the functional roles of adenosine, and to excellent means to study the specificity of drugs. There are also interesting associations between disease and structural variants in one or more of the adenosine receptors. Several new selective agonists and antagonists have become available. They provide improved possibilities for receptor classification. There are also developments hinting at the usefulness of allosteric modulators. Many drugs targeting adenosine receptors are in clinical trials, but the established therapeutic use is still very limited.

https://pharmrev.aspetjournals.org/content/pharmrev/63/1/1.full.pdf

Bertil B. Fredholm

Papers

International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors

Actions of Caffeine in the Brain with Special Reference to Factors That Contribute to Its Widespread Use

Nomenclature and classification of purinoceptors

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXI. Nomenclature and Classification of Adenosine Receptors—An Update

Adenosine–dopamine receptor–receptor interactions as an integrative mechanism in the basal ganglia