scispace - formally typeset
C

Chantal Michel

Researcher at University of Bern

Publications -  89
Citations -  1861

Chantal Michel is an academic researcher from University of Bern. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Psychosis. The author has an hindex of 18, co-authored 72 publications receiving 1381 citations. Previous affiliations of Chantal Michel include University of Geneva.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

EPA guidance on the early intervention in clinical high risk states of psychoses.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors provided evidence-based recommendations on early intervention in clinical high risk (CHR) states of psychosis, assessed according to the EPA guidance on early detection, derived from a meta-analysis of current empirical evidence on the efficacy of psychological and pharmacological interventions in CHR samples.
Journal ArticleDOI

Age matters in the prevalence and clinical significance of ultra‐high‐risk for psychosis symptoms and criteria in the general population: Findings from the BEAR and BEARS‐kid studies

TL;DR: A strong age effect was detected around age 16: compared to older individuals, 8‐15‐year olds reported more perceptive APS, that is, unusual perceptual experiences and attenuated hallucinations, which were generally less related to functional impairment, regardless of age.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multimodal Machine Learning Workflows for Prediction of Psychosis in Patients With Clinical High-Risk Syndromes and Recent-Onset Depression

TL;DR: This prognostic study evaluates whether psychosis transition can be predicted in patients with clinical high-risk syndromes or recent-onset depression by multimodal machine learning that optimally integrates clinical and neurocognitive data, structural magnetic resonance imaging, and polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of DSM-5–Attenuated Psychosis Syndrome in Adolescents and Young Adults in the General Population: The Bern Epidemiological At-Risk (BEAR) Study

TL;DR: Primary analyses suggest that a revised syndrome would also possess higher clinical significance than the current syndrome, and particularly, the onset/worsening criterion, originally included to increase the likelihood of progression to psychosis, lowered its prevalence.