scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Cherry Ng published in 2023"


Journal ArticleDOI
Adeel Afzal, G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B'ecsy, Jose J. Blanco-Pillado, Laura Blecha, Kimberly K. Boddy, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Rand Burnette, Rob Case, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, K. Chatziioannou, B. D. Cheeseboro, Siyuan Chen, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Curt Cutler, Megan E. DeCesar, Dallas M. DeGan, Paul Demorest, Heling Deng, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, K. Gultekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Sophie Hourihane, K. Islo, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, Vincent S. H. Lee, Natalia Lewandowska, Rafael R. Lino dos Santos, Tyson Littenberg, Tianyu Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jingtao Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, P. M. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, John Nay, Priyamvada Natarajan, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, P. E. Petrov, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, C. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, L. Schult, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Jerry P. Sun, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Jacob M. Taylor, Stephen Taylor, Tanner Trickle, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, Sonali Verma, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Qiaohong Wang, Caitlin A. Witt, Davis Wright, Olivia Young, Kathryn M. Zurek 
TL;DR: The 15-year pulsar timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) shows positive evidence for the presence of a low-frequency gravitational-wave (GW) background as mentioned in this paper .
Abstract: The 15 yr pulsar timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) shows positive evidence for the presence of a low-frequency gravitational-wave (GW) background. In this paper, we investigate potential cosmological interpretations of this signal, specifically cosmic inflation, scalar-induced GWs, first-order phase transitions, cosmic strings, and domain walls. We find that, with the exception of stable cosmic strings of field theory origin, all these models can reproduce the observed signal. When compared to the standard interpretation in terms of inspiraling supermassive black hole binaries (SMBHBs), many cosmological models seem to provide a better fit resulting in Bayes factors in the range from 10 to 100. However, these results strongly depend on modeling assumptions about the cosmic SMBHB population and, at this stage, should not be regarded as evidence for new physics. Furthermore, we identify excluded parameter regions where the predicted GW signal from cosmological sources significantly exceeds the NANOGrav signal. These parameter constraints are independent of the origin of the NANOGrav signal and illustrate how pulsar timing data provide a new way to constrain the parameter space of these models. Finally, we search for deterministic signals produced by models of ultralight dark matter (ULDM) and dark matter substructures in the Milky Way. We find no evidence for either of these signals and thus report updated constraints on these models. In the case of ULDM, these constraints outperform torsion balance and atomic clock constraints for ULDM coupled to electrons, muons, or gluons.

43 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. Bécsy, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Rand Burnette, Rob Case, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, K. Chatziioannou, B. D. Cheeseboro, Siyuan Chen, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Curt Cutler, Megan E. DeCesar, Dallas M. DeGan, Paul Demorest, Heling Deng, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, Justin A. Ellis, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, K. Gultekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Sophie Hourihane, K. Islo, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tyson Littenberg, Tianyu Liu, Andrea N. Lommen, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jingtao Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, P. M. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Priyamvada Natarajan, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, P. E. Petrov, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, C. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, L. Schult, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Jerry P. Sun, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Jacob M. Taylor, Stephen Taylor, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, R. van Haasteren, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Qiaohong Wang, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
TL;DR: In this article , the Hellings-Downs pattern is observed for a stochastic signal that is correlated among 67 pulsars from the 15-year pulsar timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves.
Abstract: We report multiple lines of evidence for a stochastic signal that is correlated among 67 pulsars from the 15 yr pulsar timing data set collected by the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves. The correlations follow the Hellings–Downs pattern expected for a stochastic gravitational-wave background. The presence of such a gravitational-wave background with a power-law spectrum is favored over a model with only independent pulsar noises with a Bayes factor in excess of 1014, and this same model is favored over an uncorrelated common power-law spectrum model with Bayes factors of 200–1000, depending on spectral modeling choices. We have built a statistical background distribution for the latter Bayes factors using a method that removes interpulsar correlations from our data set, finding p = 10−3 (≈3σ) for the observed Bayes factors in the null no-correlation scenario. A frequentist test statistic built directly as a weighted sum of interpulsar correlations yields p = 5 × 10−5 to 1.9 × 10−4 (≈3.5σ–4σ). Assuming a fiducial f −2/3 characteristic strain spectrum, as appropriate for an ensemble of binary supermassive black hole inspirals, the strain amplitude is 2.4−0.6+0.7×10−15 (median + 90% credible interval) at a reference frequency of 1 yr−1. The inferred gravitational-wave background amplitude and spectrum are consistent with astrophysical expectations for a signal from a population of supermassive black hole binaries, although more exotic cosmological and astrophysical sources cannot be excluded. The observation of Hellings–Downs correlations points to the gravitational-wave origin of this signal.

29 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
G. Y. Agazie, Md F. Alam, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, Laura Blecha, Victoria Bonidie, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, B. B'ecsy, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul Demorest, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, K. Gultekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Ross J. Jennings, Cody Jessup, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, A. Kuske, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tianyu Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jingtao Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Kaleb Maraccini, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Laura Salo, Shashwat C. Sardesai, C. Schmiedekamp, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Stephen Taylor, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Qiaohong Wang, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors present observations and timing analyses of 68 millisecond pulsars (MSPs) comprising the 15 yr data set of the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav).
Abstract: We present observations and timing analyses of 68 millisecond pulsars (MSPs) comprising the 15 yr data set of the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav). NANOGrav is a pulsar timing array (PTA) experiment that is sensitive to low-frequency gravitational waves (GWs). This is NANOGrav’s fifth public data release, including both “narrowband” and “wideband” time-of-arrival (TOA) measurements and corresponding pulsar timing models. We have added 21 MSPs and extended our timing baselines by 3 yr, now spanning nearly 16 yr for some of our sources. The data were collected using the Arecibo Observatory, the Green Bank Telescope, and the Very Large Array between frequencies of 327 MHz and 3 GHz, with most sources observed approximately monthly. A number of notable methodological and procedural changes were made compared to our previous data sets. These improve the overall quality of the TOA data set and are part of the transition to new pulsar timing and PTA analysis software packages. For the first time, our data products are accompanied by a full suite of software to reproduce data reduction, analysis, and results. Our timing models include a variety of newly detected astrometric and binary pulsar parameters, including several significant improvements to pulsar mass constraints. We find that the time series of 23 pulsars contain detectable levels of red noise, 10 of which are new measurements. In this data set, we find evidence for a stochastic GW background.

20 citations


G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, P. T. Baker, B. B'ecsy, Laura Blecha, Alexander Bonilla, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Rand Burnette, Rob Case, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, K. Chatziioannou, B. D. Cheeseboro, Siyuan Chen, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Curt Cutler, Daniel J. D'Orazio, Megan E. DeCesar, Dallas M. DeGan, Paul Demorest, Heling Deng, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, Emma Gardiner, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, K. Gultekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Sophie Hourihane, K. Islo, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tyson Littenberg, Tianyu Liu, Jingtao Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, P. M. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Priyamvada Natarajan, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, P. E. Petrov, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Jessie C. Runnoe, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, C. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, L. Schult, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Jerry P. Sun, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Jacob M. Taylor, Stephen Taylor, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, Sarah J. Vigeland, Jeremy M. Wachter, Haley M. Wahl, Qiaohong Wang, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
28 Jun 2023
TL;DR: In this article , the authors analyzed the signal as coming from a population of supermassive black hole (SMBH) binaries distributed throughout the Universe and showed that astrophysically motivated models of SMBH binary populations are able to reproduce both the amplitude and shape of the observed low-frequency gravitational-wave spectrum.
Abstract: The NANOGrav 15-year data set shows evidence for the presence of a low-frequency gravitational-wave background (GWB). While many physical processes can source such low-frequency gravitational waves, here we analyze the signal as coming from a population of supermassive black hole (SMBH) binaries distributed throughout the Universe. We show that astrophysically motivated models of SMBH binary populations are able to reproduce both the amplitude and shape of the observed low-frequency gravitational-wave spectrum. While multiple model variations are able to reproduce the GWB spectrum at our current measurement precision, our results highlight the importance of accurately modeling binary evolution for producing realistic GWB spectra. Additionally, while reasonable parameters are able to reproduce the 15-year observations, the implied GWB amplitude necessitates either a large number of parameters to be at the edges of expected values, or a small number of parameters to be notably different from standard expectations. While we are not yet able to definitively establish the origin of the inferred GWB signal, the consistency of the signal with astrophysical expectations offers a tantalizing prospect for confirming that SMBH binaries are able to form, reach sub-parsec separations, and eventually coalesce. As the significance grows over time, higher-order features of the GWB spectrum will definitively determine the nature of the GWB and allow for novel constraints on SMBH populations.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B'ecsy, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul Demorest, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, Kayhan Gültekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. Joseph W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tingting Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jingtao Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, C. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Stephen Taylor, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
TL;DR: In this article , a noise and sensitivity analysis of pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) is presented, along with an in-depth introduction to PTA noise models and a power-law-integrated analysis.
Abstract: Pulsar timing arrays (PTAs) are galactic-scale gravitational wave (GW) detectors. Each individual arm, composed of a millisecond pulsar, a radio telescope, and a kiloparsecs-long path, differs in its properties but, in aggregate, can be used to extract low-frequency GW signals. We present a noise and sensitivity analysis to accompany the NANOGrav 15 yr data release and associated papers, along with an in-depth introduction to PTA noise models. As a first step in our analysis, we characterize each individual pulsar data set with three types of white-noise parameters and two red-noise parameters. These parameters, along with the timing model and, particularly, a piecewise-constant model for the time-variable dispersion measure, determine the sensitivity curve over the low-frequency GW band we are searching. We tabulate information for all of the pulsars in this data release and present some representative sensitivity curves. We then combine the individual pulsar sensitivities using a signal-to-noise ratio statistic to calculate the global sensitivity of the PTA to a stochastic background of GWs, obtaining a minimum noise characteristic strain of 7 × 10−15 at 5 nHz. A power-law-integrated analysis shows rough agreement with the amplitudes recovered in NANOGrav’s 15 yr GW background analysis. While our phenomenological noise model does not model all known physical effects explicitly, it provides an accurate characterization of the noise in the data while preserving sensitivity to multiple classes of GW signals.

10 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , a new repeating fast radio burst (FRB) sources were found among CHIME/FRB events detected between 2019 September 30 and 2021 May 1, using a new clustering algorithm that looks for multiple events colocated on the sky having similar dispersion measures (DMs).
Abstract: We present the discovery of 25 new repeating fast radio burst (FRB) sources found among CHIME/FRB events detected between 2019 September 30 and 2021 May 1. The sources were found using a new clustering algorithm that looks for multiple events colocated on the sky having similar dispersion measures (DMs). The new repeaters have DMs ranging from ∼220 to ∼1700 pc cm−3, and include sources having exhibited as few as two bursts to as many as twelve. We report a statistically significant difference in both the DM and extragalactic DM (eDM) distributions between repeating and apparently nonrepeating sources, with repeaters having a lower mean DM and eDM, and we discuss the implications. We find no clear bimodality between the repetition rates of repeaters and upper limits on repetition from apparently nonrepeating sources after correcting for sensitivity and exposure effects, although some active repeating sources stand out as anomalous. We measure the repeater fraction over time and find that it tends to an equilibrium of 2.6−2.6+2.9 % over our total time-on-sky thus far. We also report on 14 more sources, which are promising repeating FRB candidates and which merit follow-up observations for confirmation.

9 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
Mikel Falxa, Stanislav Babak, P. T. Baker, B. B'ecsy, Aurelie Chalumeau, Si Chen, Z. Chen, Neil J. Cornish, L. Guillemot, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Aditya Parthasarathy, Antoine Petiteau, Nihan Pol, Alberto Sesana, Sarah Spolaor, Stephen Taylor, Gilles Theureau, Michele Vallisneri, Sarah J. Vigeland, Caitlin A. Witt, X Zhu, John Antoniadis, Zaven Arzoumanian, Matthew Bailes, N. D. R. Bhat, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Noemí Caballero, A. D. Cameron, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, D. J. Champion, Maria Charisi, S. Chatterjee, Ismaël Cognard, James M. Cordes, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Shi Dai, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul Demorest, Gregory Desvignes, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, Y Feng, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, N. Garver-Daniels, J. Glaser, B. Goncharov, Deborah C. Good, J.-M. Grießmeier, Y. J. Guo, K. Gultekin, George Hobbs, H Hu, K. Islo, J. S. Jang, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, M. L. Jones, Jane F. Kaczmarek, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Michael Keith, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, T G Liu, J. Luo, Ryan Lynch, D. R. Madison, Robert Main, Richard N. Manchester, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Stefan Oslowski, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, Delphine Perrodin, N.K. Porayko, A. Possenti, H. Quelquejay-Leclere, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Daniel J. Reardon, Christopher J. Russell, A. Samajdar, John Sarkissian, L. Schult, G. Shaifullah, Ryan Shannon, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Toby L. Smith, Lorenzo Speri, Renée Spiewak, Ingrid H. Stairs, Ben Stappers, Daniel R. Stinebring, Joseph K. Swiggum, Caterina Tiburzi, John Turner, Alberto Vecchio, Joris P. W. Verbiest, Haley M. Wahl, Su Wang, J. Wang, Li Zhang, S Zhang 
TL;DR: In this article , the International Pulsar Timing Array 2nd data release is the combination of datasets from worldwide collaborations, and the authors search for continuous waves: gravitational wave signals produced by individual supermassive black hole binaries in the local universe.
Abstract: The International Pulsar Timing Array 2nd data release is the combination of datasets from worldwide collaborations. In this study, we search for continuous waves: gravitational wave signals produced by individual supermassive black hole binaries in the local universe. We consider binaries on circular orbits and neglect the evolution of orbital frequency over the observational span. We find no evidence for such signals and set sky averaged 95% upper limits on their amplitude h 95 . The most sensitive frequency is 10nHz with h 95 = 9.1 10-15 . We achieved the best upper limit to date at low and high frequencies of the PTA band thanks to improved effective cadence of observations. In our analysis, we have taken into account the recently discovered common red noise process, which has an impact at low frequencies. We also find that the peculiar noise features present in some pulsars data must be taken into account to reduce the false alarm. We show that using custom noise models is essential in searching for continuous gravitational wave signals and setting the upper limit.

7 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the uncertainties on pulsar distances were modeled to account for a common red-noise process in pulsar data sets while searching for deterministic gravitational wave signals, including continuous waves.
Abstract: Pulsar timing array collaborations, such as the North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav), are seeking to detect nanohertz gravitational waves emitted by supermassive black hole binaries formed in the aftermath of galaxy mergers. We have searched for continuous waves from individual circular supermassive black hole binaries using NANOGrav’s recent 12.5 yr data set. We created new methods to accurately model the uncertainties on pulsar distances in our analysis, and we implemented new techniques to account for a common red-noise process in pulsar timing array data sets while searching for deterministic gravitational wave signals, including continuous waves. As we found no evidence for continuous waves in our data, we placed 95% upper limits on the strain amplitude of continuous waves emitted by these sources. At our most sensitive frequency of 7.65 nHz, we placed a sky-averaged limit of h 0 < (6.82 ± 0.35) × 10−15, and h 0 < (2.66 ± 0.15) × 10−15 in our most sensitive sky location. Finally, we placed a multimessenger limit of <(1.41±0.02)×109M⊙ on the chirp mass of the supermassive black hole binary candidate 3C 66B.

5 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , a state-of-the-art deep learning-based technosignature search on 820 stellar targets from the Hipparcos catalogue is presented, where a novel β-convolutional variational autoencoder is used to identify technossignature candidates in a semi-unsupervised manner.
Abstract: The goal of the search for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) is to quantify the prevalence of technological life beyond Earth via their ‘technosignatures’. One theorized technosignature is narrowband Doppler drifting radio signals. The principal challenge in conducting SETI in the radio domain is developing a generalized technique to reject human radiofrequency interference. Here we present a comprehensive deep-learning-based technosignature search on 820 stellar targets from the Hipparcos catalogue, totalling over 480 h of on-sky data taken with the Robert C. Byrd Green Bank Telescope as part of the Breakthrough Listen initiative. We implement a novel β-convolutional variational autoencoder to identify technosignature candidates in a semi-unsupervised manner while keeping the false-positive rate manageably low, reducing the number of candidate signals by approximately two orders of magnitude compared with previous analyses on the same dataset. Our work also returned eight promising extraterrestrial intelligence signals of interest not previously identified. Re-observations on these targets have so far not resulted in re-detections of signals with similar morphology. This machine-learning approach presents itself as a leading solution in accelerating SETI and other transient research into the age of data-driven astronomy. A state-of-the-art machine-learning method combs a 480-h-long dataset of 820 nearby stars from the SETI Breakthrough Listen project, reducing the number of interesting signals by two orders of magnitude. Further visual inspection identifies eight promising signals of interest from different stars that warrant further observations.

5 citations


G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B'ecsy, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul Demorest, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, Emma Gardiner, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, K. Gultekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tingting Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jingtao Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, C. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, L. Schult, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Stephen Taylor, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
28 Jun 2023
TL;DR: In this article , the authors search for anisotropy in the GWB using multiple methods and bases to describe the distribution of GWB power on the sky, and place a Bayesian $95\%$ upper limit on the level of broadband anisotropic such that $(C l>0} / C l=0) < 20% .
Abstract: The North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav) has reported evidence for the presence of an isotropic nanohertz gravitational wave background (GWB) in its 15 yr dataset. However, if the GWB is produced by a population of inspiraling supermassive black hole binary (SMBHB) systems, then the background is predicted to be anisotropic, depending on the distribution of these systems in the local Universe and the statistical properties of the SMBHB population. In this work, we search for anisotropy in the GWB using multiple methods and bases to describe the distribution of the GWB power on the sky. We do not find significant evidence of anisotropy, and place a Bayesian $95\%$ upper limit on the level of broadband anisotropy such that $(C_{l>0} / C_{l=0})<20\%$. We also derive conservative estimates on the anisotropy expected from a random distribution of SMBHB systems using astrophysical simulations conditioned on the isotropic GWB inferred in the 15-yr dataset, and show that this dataset has sufficient sensitivity to probe a large fraction of the predicted level of anisotropy. We end by highlighting the opportunities and challenges in searching for anisotropy in pulsar timing array data.

4 citations


G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. B'ecsy, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Rob Case, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul Demorest, Matthew C. Digman, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabriel Freedman, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, K. Gultekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Sophie Hourihane, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tingting Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jingshu Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, P. M. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Priyamvada Natarajan, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, P. E. Petrov, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph P. Romano, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, C. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Jacob M. Taylor, Stephen Taylor, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, R. van Haasteren, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
28 Jun 2023
TL;DR: In this article , the search for individual supermassive black hole binaries in the NANOGrav 15-year dataset was conducted, and the search uncovered weak evidence for two candidate signals, one with a gravitational-wave frequency of $4 nHz and another at $170 nHz.
Abstract: Evidence for a low-frequency stochastic gravitational wave background has recently been reported based on analyses of pulsar timing array data. The most likely source of such a background is a population of supermassive black hole binaries, the loudest of which may be individually detected in these datasets. Here we present the search for individual supermassive black hole binaries in the NANOGrav 15-year dataset. We introduce several new techniques, which enhance the efficiency and modeling accuracy of the analysis. The search uncovered weak evidence for two candidate signals, one with a gravitational-wave frequency of $\sim$4 nHz, and another at $\sim$170 nHz. The significance of the low-frequency candidate was greatly diminished when Hellings-Downs correlations were included in the background model. The high-frequency candidate was discounted due to the lack of a plausible host galaxy, the unlikely astrophysical prior odds of finding such a source, and since most of its support comes from a single pulsar with a commensurate binary period. Finding no compelling evidence for signals from individual binary systems, we place upper limits on the strain amplitude of gravitational waves emitted by such systems.

Aaron M. Johnson, P. M. Meyers, P. T. Baker, Neil J. Cornish, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Tyson Littenberg, Joseph D. Romano, Stephen Taylor, Michele Vallisneri, Sarah J. Vigeland, Ken D. Olum, Xavier Siemens, Justin A. Ellis, R. van Haasteren, Sophie Hourihane, G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, B. B'ecsy, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, K. Chatziioannou, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul Demorest, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, K. Gultekin, Ross J. Jennings, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. J. W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tingting Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Shashwat C. Sardesai, C. Schmiedekamp, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, M. Schmitz, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Haley M. Wahl, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
28 Jun 2023
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors present rigorous tests of pulsar timing array methods and software, examining their consistency across a wide range of injected parameters and signal strength, and perform stringent tests of consistency and correctness of the Bayesian and frequentist analysis software.
Abstract: This paper presents rigorous tests of pulsar timing array methods and software, examining their consistency across a wide range of injected parameters and signal strength. We discuss updates to the 15-year isotropic gravitational-wave background analyses and their corresponding code representations. Descriptions of the internal structure of the flagship algorithms \texttt{Enterprise} and \texttt{PTMCMCSampler} are given to facilitate understanding of the PTA likelihood structure, how models are built, and what methods are currently used in sampling the high-dimensional PTA parameter space. We introduce a novel version of the PTA likelihood that uses a two-step marginalization procedure that performs much faster when the white noise parameters remain fixed. We perform stringent tests of consistency and correctness of the Bayesian and frequentist analysis software. For the Bayesian analysis, we test prior recovery, injection recovery, and Bayes factors. For the frequentist analysis, we test that the cross-correlation-based optimal statistic, when modified to account for a non-negligible gravitational-wave background, accurately recovers the amplitude of the background. We also summarize recent advances and tests performed on the optimal statistic in the literature from both GWB detection and parameter estimation perspectives. The tests presented here validate current and future analyses of PTA data.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors report on the polarized observations of 12 repeating sources using multi-year monitoring with the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) over 400-800 MHz.
Abstract: Fast radio bursts (FRBs) display a confounding variety of burst properties and host-galaxy associations. Repeating FRBs offer insight into the FRB population by enabling spectral, temporal, and polarimetric properties to be tracked over time. Here, we report on the polarized observations of 12 repeating sources using multiyear monitoring with the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) over 400–800 MHz. We observe significant rotation measure (RM) variations from many sources in our sample, including RM changes of several hundred radians per square meter over month timescales from FRBs 20181119A, 20190303A, and 20190417A, and more modest RM variability (ΔRM ≲ few tens of radians per square meter) from FRBs 20181030A, 20190208A, 20190213B, and 20190117A over equivalent timescales. Several repeaters display a frequency-dependent degree of linear polarization that is consistent with depolarization via scattering. Combining our measurements of RM variations with equivalent constraints on DM variability, we estimate the average line-of-sight magnetic field strength in the local environment of each repeater. In general, repeating FRBs display RM variations that are more prevalent and/or extreme than those seen from radio pulsars in the Milky Way and the Magellanic Clouds, suggesting repeating FRBs and pulsars occupy distinct magnetoionic environments.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Amiri et al. as discussed by the authors proposed a CHIME/FRB Collaboration, which consists of a set of researchers from the CHIME and FRB Collaborative, including the following: Bridget C. Andersen, Brant C. Good, Mark Halpern, Alex S. Hill, Gary Hinshaw, Alexander Josephy, Jane F. Boyce, P. Richard Shaw, Kaitlyn Shin, Seth R. Smith, Ingrid Stairs, Chia Min Tan, S. P. Tendulkar, Haochen Wang, Dallas Wulf, and A. V. Zwaniga.
Abstract: The CHIME/FRB Collaboration, Mandana Amiri , Bridget C. Andersen , Kevin Bandura , Sabrina Berger , Mohit Bhardwaj , Michelle M. Boyce , P. J. Boyle , Charanjot Brar , Daniela Breitman , Tomas Cassanelli , Pragya Chawla , Tianyue Chen , J.-F. Cliche , Amanda Cook , Davor Cubranic , Alice P. Curtin , Meiling Deng , Matt Dobbs , Fengqiu (Adam) Dong , Gwendolyn Eadie , Mateus Fandino , Emmanuel Fonseca , B. M. Gaensler , Utkarsh Giri , Deborah C. Good , Mark Halpern , Alex S. Hill , Gary Hinshaw , Alexander Josephy , Jane F. Kaczmarek , Zarif Kader , Joseph W. Kania , Victoria M. Kaspi , T. L. Landecker , Dustin Lang , Calvin Leung , Dongzi Li , Hsiu-Hsien Lin , Kiyoshi W. Masui , Ryan Mckinven , Juan Mena-Parra , Marcus Merryfield , Bradley W. Meyers , Daniele Michilli , Nikola Milutinovic , Arash Mirhosseini , Moritz Münchmeyer , Arun Naidu , Laura Newburgh , Cherry Ng , Chitrang Patel , Ue-Li Pen , Emily Petroff , Tristan Pinsonneault-Marotte , Ziggy Pleunis , Masoud Rafiei-Ravandi , Mubdi Rahman , Scott M. Ransom , Andre Renard , Pranav Sanghavi , Paul Scholz , J. Richard Shaw , Kaitlyn Shin , Seth R. Siegel , Andrew E. Sikora , Saurabh Singh , Kendrick M. Smith , Ingrid Stairs , Chia Min Tan , S. P. Tendulkar , Keith Vanderlinde , Haochen Wang , Dallas Wulf , and A. V. Zwaniga 1 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z1, Canada 2 Department of Physics, McGill University, 3600 rue University, Montréal, QC H3A 2T8, Canada 3 McGill Space Institute, McGill University, 3550 rue University, Montréal, QC H3A 2A7, Canada 4 Lane Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 1220 Evansdale Drive, PO Box 6109, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA 5 Center for Gravitational Waves and Cosmology, West Virginia University, Chestnut Ridge Research Building, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA 6 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada 7 Department of Physics, University of Toronto, 60 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 1A7, Canada 8 Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada 9 David A. Dunlap Department of Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto, ON M5S 3H4, Canada 10 MIT Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 11 Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline Street N, Waterloo, ON N25 2YL, Canada 12 Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory, Herzberg Research Centre for Astronomy and Astrophysics, National Research Council Canada, PO Box 248,

Journal ArticleDOI
G. Y. Agazie, A. Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, P. T. Baker, B. Bécsy, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Rob Case, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, Tyler Cohen, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan E. DeCesar, Paul Demorest, Matthew C. Digman, Timothy Dolch, Brendan Drachler, V. Ferrara, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabrielle Freedman, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Joseph P Glaser, Deborah C. Good, Kayhan Gültekin, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Sophie Hourihane, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron M. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, Andrew R. Kaiser, David L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, Matthew Kerr, Joey Shapiro Key, Nima Laal, Michael T. Lam, W. Lamb, T. Joseph W. Lazio, Natalia Lewandowska, Tianyu Liu, Duncan R. Lorimer, Jingtao Luo, Ryan Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, D. R. Madison, Alexander McEwen, J. W. McKee, Maura McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, B. W. Meyers, P. M. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, S. Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge Perera, P. E. Petrov, Nihan Pol, Henri A. Radovan, Scott M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann B. Schmiedekamp, C. Schmiedekamp, K. Schmitz, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Magdalena Siwek, Ingrid H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Jacob M. Taylor, Stephen Taylor, J. E. Turner, Caner Unal, Michele Vallisneri, R. van Haasteren, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, Caitlin A. Witt, Olivia Young 
TL;DR: In this paper , the search for individual supermassive black hole binaries in the NANOGrav 15-year data set was conducted and the search uncovered weak evidence for two candidate signals, one with a gravitational-wave frequency of ∼4 nHz, and another at ∼170 nHz.
Abstract: Evidence for a low-frequency stochastic gravitational-wave background has recently been reported based on analyses of pulsar timing array data. The most likely source of such a background is a population of supermassive black hole binaries, the loudest of which may be individually detected in these data sets. Here we present the search for individual supermassive black hole binaries in the NANOGrav 15 yr data set. We introduce several new techniques, which enhance the efficiency and modeling accuracy of the analysis. The search uncovered weak evidence for two candidate signals, one with a gravitational-wave frequency of ∼4 nHz, and another at ∼170 nHz. The significance of the low-frequency candidate was greatly diminished when Hellings–Downs correlations were included in the background model. The high-frequency candidate was discounted due to the lack of a plausible host galaxy, the unlikely astrophysical prior odds of finding such a source, and since most of its support comes from a single pulsar with a commensurate binary period. Finding no compelling evidence for signals from individual binary systems, we place upper limits on the strain amplitude of gravitational waves emitted by such systems. At our most sensitive frequency of 6 nHz, we place a sky-averaged 95% upper limit of 8 × 10−15 on the strain amplitude. We also calculate an exclusion volume and a corresponding effective radius, within which we can rule out the presence of black hole binaries emitting at a given frequency.

11 Jul 2023
TL;DR: In this article , the authors study the 10 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected in the far side-lobe region of the CHIME telescope from 2018 August 28 to 2021 August 31.
Abstract: We study the 10 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected in the far side-lobe region of the CHIME telescope from 2018 August 28 to 2021 August 31. We find that the far side-lobe events have on average $\sim$500 times greater fluxes than events detected in CHIME's main lobe. We show that the side-lobe sample is therefore statistically $\sim$20 times closer than the main-lobe sample. The median dispersion measure (DM) excess, after removing the Galactic disk component using the NE2001 for the free electron density distribution of the Milky Way, of the 10 far side-lobe and 471 non-repeating main-lobe FRBs in the first CHIME/FRB catalog is 183.0 and 433.9 pc\;cm$^{-3}$, respectively. By comparing the DM excesses of the two populations under reasonable assumptions, we statistically constrain that the local degenerate contributions (from the Milky Way halo and the host galaxy) and the intergalactic contribution to the excess DM of the 471 non-repeating main-lobe FRBs for the NE2001 model are 131.2$-$158.3 and 302.7$-$275.6 pc cm$^{-3}$, respectively, which corresponds to a median redshift for the main-lobe FRB sample of $\sim$0.3. These constraints are useful for population studies of FRBs, and in particular for constraining the location of the missing baryons.

11 Jul 2023
TL;DR: In this article , the authors reported ten fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected in the far side-lobe region (i.e., $\geq 5^\circ$ off-meridian) of the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) from 2018 August 28 to 2021 August 31.
Abstract: We report ten fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected in the far side-lobe region (i.e., $\geq 5^\circ$ off-meridian) of the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) from 2018 August 28 to 2021 August 31. We localize the bursts by fitting their spectra with a model of the CHIME/FRB synthesized beam response. CHIME/FRB did not observe repetition of similar brightness from the uniform sample of 10 side-lobe FRBs in a total exposure time of 35580 hours. Under the assumption of Poisson-distributed bursts, we infer that the mean repetition interval above the detecting threshold of the far side-lobe events is longer than 11880 hours, which is at least 2380 times larger than the interval from known CHIME/FRB detected repeating sources, with some caveats, notably that very narrow-band events could have been missed. Our results from these far side-lobe events suggest one of two scenarios: either (1) all FRBs repeat and the repetition intervals span a wide range, with high-rate repeaters being a rare subpopulation, or (2) non-repeating FRBs are a distinct population different from known repeaters.

18 Jul 2023
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors demonstrate the localization of fast radio bursts (FRBs) with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) on two baselines, using data collected only at the time of detection.
Abstract: Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond-duration, luminous radio transients of extragalactic origin. These events have been used to trace the baryonic structure of the Universe using their dispersion measure (DM) assuming that the contribution from host galaxies can be reliably estimated. However, contributions from the immediate environment of an FRB may dominate the observed DM, thus making redshift estimates challenging without a robust host galaxy association. Furthermore, while at least one Galactic burst has been associated with a magnetar, other localized FRBs argue against magnetars as the sole progenitor model. Precise localization within the host galaxy %can enable estimation of the host galaxy DM contribution and can discriminate between progenitor models, a major goal of the field. Until now, localizations on this spatial scale have only been carried out in follow-up observations of repeating sources. Here we demonstrate the localization of FRB 20210603A with very long baseline interferometry (VLBI) on two baselines, using data collected only at the time of detection. We localize the burst to SDSS J004105.82+211331.9, an edge-on galaxy at $z\approx 0.177$, and detect recent star formation in the kiloparsec-scale vicinity of the burst. The edge-on inclination of the host galaxy allows for a unique comparison between the line of sight towards the FRB and lines of sight towards known Galactic pulsars. The DM, Faraday rotation measure (RM), and scattering suggest a progenitor coincident with the host galactic plane, strengthening the link between the environment of FRB 20210603A and the disk of its host galaxy. Single-pulse VLBI localizations of FRBs to within their host galaxies, following the one presented here, will further constrain the origins and host environments of one-off FRBs.

Victor Doroshenko, Juri Poutanen, Jeremy S. Heyl, Sergey S. Tsygankov, Andrei Berdyugin, Ilaria Caiazzo, Sofia Forsblom, Vadim Kravtsov, V. V. Loktev, Alexander A. Lutovinov, Christian Malacaria, Ilya A. Mereminskiy, Sergey V. Molkov, Alexander A. Mushtukov, Alexander Salganik, Andrea Santangelo, Valery F. Suleimanov, Roberto Turolla, Alexandra Veledina, T., Ivan Agudo, L. A. Antonelli, Matteo Bachetti, Luca Baldini, W. H. Baumgartner, Ronaldo Bellazzini, Stephen Bianchi, Stephen D. Bongiorno, R. Bonino, A. Brez, Niccolò Bucciantini, Fiamma Capitanio, S. Castellano, E. Cavazzuti, C. T. Chen, Stefano Ciprini, Enrico Costa, A. de Rosa, E. Del Monte, L. Di Gesu, N. Di Lalla, A. Di Marco, I. Donnarumma, Michal Dovciak, S. Ehlert, Teruaki Enoto, Y. Evangelista, Sergio Fabiani, Riccardo Ferrazzoli, J. Garcia, Shuichi Gunji, Kiyoshi Hayashida, Wataru Iwakiri, Svetlana G. Jorstad, Philip Kaaret, Vladimir Karas, Fabian Kislat, Takao Kitaguchi, Jeffrey Kolodziejczak, Henric Krawczynski, Fabio La Monaca, Luca Latronico, Ioannis Liodakis, S. Maldera, Alberto Manfreda, Frédéric Baron, Andrea Marinucci, Alan P. Marscher, Herman L. Marshall, Francesco Massaro, Giorgio Matt, Ikuyuki Mitsuishi, Tsunefumi Mizuno, Fabio Muleri, M. Negro, Cherry Ng, Stephen L. O'Dell, Nicola Omodei, Chiara Oppedisano, Alessandro Papitto, George G. Pavlov, A. L. Peirson, M. Perri, Melissa Pesce-Rollins, P.-O. Petrucci, M. Pilia, A. Possenti, Simonetta Puccetti, Brian D. Ramsey, John Rankin, Ajay Ratheesh, Oliver J. Roberts, R. W. Romani, Carmelo Sgrò, Patrick Slane, Paolo Soffitta, Gloria Spandre, Douglas A. Swartz, Toru Tamagawa, Fabrizio Tavecchio, Roberto Taverna, Yuzuru Tawara, Antonia Tent, N. E. Thomas, Francesco Tombesi, Alessio Trois, Jacco Vink, Martin C. Weisskopf, Kinwah Wu, Fei Xie, Silvia Zane 
03 Jun 2023
TL;DR: In this paper , the pulse-phase resolved polarimetric analysis of a be-transient X-ray pulsar LS V +44 17/RX J0440.9+4431 at two luminosity levels during the giant outburst in January--February 2023 is presented.
Abstract: We report on \ixpe observations of the Be-transient X-ray pulsar LS V +44 17/RX J0440.9+4431 at two luminosity levels during the giant outburst in January--February 2023. Considering the observed spectral variability and changes in the pulse profiles, the source was likely caught in super- and sub-critical states with significantly different emission region geometry, associated with the presence of accretion columns and hot spots, respectively. We focus here on the pulse-phase resolved polarimetric analysis and find that the observed dependencies of the polarization degree and polarization angle (PA) on pulse phase are indeed drastically different for the two observations. The observed differences, if interpreted within the framework of the rotating vector model (RVM), imply dramatic variations of the spin axis inclination and the position angle and the magnetic colatitude by tens of degrees within just a few days separating the observations. We suggest that the apparent changes in the observed PA phase dependence are predominantly related to the presence of a polarized unpulsed component in addition to the polarized radiation associated with the pulsar itself. We show that the observed PA phase dependence in both observations can then be explained with a single set of RVM parameters defining the pulsar's geometry. We also suggest that the additional polarized component is likely produced by scattering of the pulsar radiation off the equatorial disk wind.