C
Chris Sandbrook
Researcher at University of Cambridge
Publications - 81
Citations - 3662
Chris Sandbrook is an academic researcher from University of Cambridge. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poverty & Tourism. The author has an hindex of 31, co-authored 76 publications receiving 2759 citations. Previous affiliations of Chris Sandbrook include World Conservation Monitoring Centre & United Nations Environment Programme.
Papers
More filters
Book
Community management of natural resources in Africa: impacts, experiences and future directions.
TL;DR: A pan-African synthesis of community-based natural resource management (CBNRM) can be found in this article, where the degree to which CBNRM has met poverty alleviation, economic development and nature conservation objectives is discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI
When and how to use Q methodology to understand perspectives in conservation research.
TL;DR: A structured literature review of 52 studies found that Q has been applied to 4 broad types of conservation goals: addressing conflict, devising management alternatives, understanding policy acceptability, and critically reflecting on the values that implicitly influence research and practice.
Journal ArticleDOI
Conservation, evidence and policy
William M. Adams,Chris Sandbrook +1 more
TL;DR: A growing literature argues for evidence-based conservation as discussed by the authors, which reflects a wider approach to policy-making and follows thinking in medicine, in which rigorous, objective analysis of evidence has contributed to widespread improvements in medical outcomes.
Journal ArticleDOI
Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications
Bram Büscher,Robert Fletcher,Dan Brockington,Chris Sandbrook,William M. Adams,Lisa M. Campbell,Catherine Corson,Wolfram Dressler,Rosaleen Duffy,Noella J. Gray,George Holmes,Alice Kelly,Elizabeth Lunstrum,Maano Ramutsindela,Kartik Shanker +14 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors question whether the increasingly popular, radical idea of turning half the Earth into a network of protected areas is either feasible or just, and call instead for alternative radical action that is both effective and more equitable, focused directly on the main drivers of biodiversity loss by shifting the global economy from its current foundation in growth while simultaneously redressing inequality.
Journal ArticleDOI
Carbon, forests and the REDD paradox.
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors argue that increasing the value of forest resources through global carbon markets without attending to local governance and rights will create political incentives towards centralized governance, which could lead to greater forest loss and lower forest-related benefits for the poor.