scispace - formally typeset
C

Christoph Böhringer

Researcher at University of Oldenburg

Publications -  281
Citations -  10209

Christoph Böhringer is an academic researcher from University of Oldenburg. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computable general equilibrium & Emissions trading. The author has an hindex of 51, co-authored 273 publications receiving 9234 citations. Previous affiliations of Christoph Böhringer include University of Stuttgart & Heidelberg University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Climate Politics From Kyoto to Bonn: From Little to Nothing?!?

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigate how the U.S. withdrawal and the amendments of the Bonn climate policy conference in 2001 will change the economic and environmental impacts of the Kyoto Protocol in its original form.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic and environmental impacts of the Kyoto Protocol

TL;DR: In this article, the authors show that the final concretion of the Kyoto Protocol is consistent with the theoretical prediction: Kyoto more or less boils down to business-as-usual without significant compliance costs to ratifying parties.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic Implications of Alternative Allocation Schemes for Emission Allowances

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors investigate the potential trade-off between compensation and economic efficiency for alternative allocation rules where emission allowances are based on either emissions or output, and they show that in open trading systems the tradeoff becomes the more severe, the higher the international permit price is.
Journal ArticleDOI

Robust policies to mitigate carbon leakage

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that the combination of output-based rebating and a consumption tax for emission-intensive and trade-exposed goods can be equivalent with border carbon adjustment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic Implications of Alternative Allocation Schemes for Emission Allowances

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examined the trade-off between compensation and economic efficiency under output-based and emissions-based allocation rules and showed that the emissions based allocation rule is more costly than the output based rule in terms of maintaining output and employment in energy intensive industries.