scispace - formally typeset
D

David A. Jackson

Researcher at King's College London

Publications -  1166
Citations -  76015

David A. Jackson is an academic researcher from King's College London. The author has contributed to research in topics: Optical fiber & Interferometry. The author has an hindex of 136, co-authored 1095 publications receiving 68352 citations. Previous affiliations of David A. Jackson include University of California, Berkeley & University of Alberta.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

White Light Interferometer Using Linear Ccd Array with Signal Processing

TL;DR: In this paper, the spectral properties of the output of an interferometer illuminated by a white light source have been analyzed, and a sensor can be produced requiring no initialisation, and since the frequency response is highly linear, the system may be easily calibrated.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Signal-to-noise ratio in an OCT/confocal system and penetration depth in OCT

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors considered a configuration that allows simultaneous display of the confocal signal and the OCT signal, which requires a separate confocal channel in the system, and discussed the noise sources in the two channels.
Patent

Vortex flowmeter with interferometrical vibration sensor

TL;DR: In this paper, an approach for measuring the flow of fluid comprising: vortex producing means for producing vortices in the fluid flow, a vortex detector member mounted to be moved by said vortice, movement detector for detecting movement of said vortex detector, and an interferometer having two reflective surfaces, a first one connected to move with the vortex detector and the second one mounted stationarily and, means to detect interferometrically relative movement between said two reflective surface.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Late Breaking Abstract - Defining a severe asthma super-responder: findings from a Delphi process

TL;DR: The Delphi panel comprised 81 participants (94% specialist pulmonologists or allergists) from 24 countries and consisted of 3 iterative online voting rounds as mentioned in this paper, with consensus on individual items required at least 70% agreement by panel members.