scispace - formally typeset
D

Dawn I. Velligan

Researcher at University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio

Publications -  159
Citations -  6655

Dawn I. Velligan is an academic researcher from University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. The author has contributed to research in topics: Schizophrenia & Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming). The author has an hindex of 35, co-authored 140 publications receiving 5860 citations. Previous affiliations of Dawn I. Velligan include University of Texas at Austin & University of Texas at San Antonio.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The expert consensus guideline series: adherence problems in patients with serious and persistent mental illness.

TL;DR: Recommendations for addressing adherence problems to improve patient outcomes are developed, noting that multiple problems may be involved, requiring a combination of interventions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond hypofrontality: A quantitative meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of working memory in schizophrenia

TL;DR: The complex pattern of hyper‐ and hypoactivation consistently found across studies implies that rather than focusing on DLPFC dysregulation, researchers should consider the entire network of regions involved in a given task when making inferences about the biological mechanisms of schizophrenia.
Journal ArticleDOI

Defining and Assessing Adherence to Oral Antipsychotics: A Review of the Literature

TL;DR: Suggestions for consensus development are made, including the use of recommended terminology for different subject samples, the increased use of objective or direct measures, and the inclusion in all studies of an estimate of the percentage of medication taken as prescribed in an effort to increase comparability among studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Performance-Based Measures of Functional Skills: Usefulness in Clinical Treatment Studies

TL;DR: It is concluded that direct assessment of functional capacity has substantial advantages over other measures and may actually provide a more direct and valid estimate of functional disability than performance on the more distal neuropsychological assessment measures.