scispace - formally typeset
D

Diana Ekman

Researcher at Science for Life Laboratory

Publications -  44
Citations -  2572

Diana Ekman is an academic researcher from Science for Life Laboratory. The author has contributed to research in topics: Poison control & Population. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 42 publications receiving 2352 citations. Previous affiliations of Diana Ekman include Linköping University & Stockholm University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What properties characterize the hub proteins of the protein-protein interaction network of Saccharomyces cerevisiae?

TL;DR: The results indicate that multiple and repeated domains are enriched in hub proteins and, further, that long disordered regions, which are common in date hubs, are particularly important for flexible binding.
Journal ArticleDOI

Expansion of Protein Domain Repeats

TL;DR: The internal sequence similarity in each protein revealed that the domain repeats are often expanded through duplications of several domains at a time, while the duplication of one domain is less common and the duplication patterns show no dependence on the size of the domains.
Journal ArticleDOI

Arrangements in the modular evolution of proteins

TL;DR: The analysis of protein-domain rearrangements has provided us with functional and evolutionary insights and has aided improved functional predictions and domain assignments to previously uncharacterised genes and proteins.
Journal ArticleDOI

Multi-domain Proteins in the Three Kingdoms of Life: Orphan Domains and Other Unassigned Regions

TL;DR: All eukaryotes have similar fractions of multi-domain proteins and disorder, whereas a high fraction of repeating domain is distinguished only in multicellular eukaries, which implies a role for repeats in cell-cell contacts while the other two features are important for intracellular functions.
Journal ArticleDOI

Combined sequence-based and genetic mapping analysis of complex traits in outbred rats

Amelie Baud, +70 more
- 26 May 2013 - 
TL;DR: It is shown that the extent and spatial pattern of variation in inbred rats differ substantially from those of inbred mice and that the genetic variants in orthologous genes rarely contribute to the same phenotype in both species.