/pdf/metal-organic-frameworks-and-self-assembled-supramolecular-2xs948xxr9.pdf

Metal–Organic Frameworks and Self-Assembled Supramolecular Coordination Complexes: Comparing and Contrasting the Design, Synthesis, and Functionality of Metal–Organic Materials

Fascination with supramolecular chemistry over the last few decades has led to the synthesis of an ever-increasing number of elegant and intricate functional structures with sizes that approach nanoscopic dimensions Today, it has grown into a mature field of modern science whose interfaces with many disciplines have provided invaluable opportunities for crossing boundaries both inside and between the fields of chemistry, physics, and biology This chemistry is of continuing interest for synthetic chemists; partly because of the fascinating physical and chemical properties and the complex and varied aesthetically pleasing structures that supramolecules possess For scientists seeking to design novel molecular materials exhibiting unusual sensing, magnetic, optical, and catalytic properties, and for researchers investigating the structure and function of biomolecules, supramolecular chemistry provides limitless possibilities Thus, it transcends the traditional divisional boundaries of science and represents a highly interdisciplinary field

In the early 1960s, the discovery of ‘crown ethers’, ‘cryptands’ and ‘spherands’ by Pedersen,1 Lehn,2 and Cram3 respectively, led to the realization that small, complementary molecules can be made to recognize each other through non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen-bonding, charge-charge, donor-acceptor, π-π, van der Waals, etc Such ‘programmed’ molecules can thus be self-assembled by utilizing these interactions in a definite algorithm to form large supramolecules that have different physicochemical properties than those of the precursor building blocks Typical systems are designed such that the self-assembly process is kinetically reversible; the individual building blocks gradually funnel towards an ensemble that represents the thermodynamic minimum of the system via numerous association and dissociation steps By tuning various reaction parameters, the reaction equilibrium can be shifted towards the desired product As such, self-assembly has a distinct advantage over traditional, stepwise synthetic approaches when accessing large molecules

It is well known that nature has the ability to assemble relatively simple molecular precursors into extremely complex biomolecules, which are vital for life processes Nature’s building blocks possess specific functionalities in configurations that allow them to interact with one another in a deliberate manner Protein folding, nucleic acid assembly and tertiary structure, phospholipid membranes, ribosomes, microtubules, etc are but a selective, representative example of self-assembly in nature that is of critical importance for living organisms Nature makes use of a variety of weak, non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen–bonding, charge–charge, donor–acceptor, π-π, van der Waals, hydrophilic and hydrophobic, etc interactions to achieve these highly complex and often symmetrical architectures In fact, the existence of life is heavily dependent on these phenomena The aforementioned structures provide inspiration for chemists seeking to exploit the ‘weak interactions’ described above to make scaffolds rivaling the complexity of natural systems

The breadth of supramolecular chemistry has progressively increased with the synthesis of numerous unique supramolecules each year Based on the interactions used in the assembly process, supramolecular chemistry can be broadly classified in to three main branches: i) those that utilize H-bonding motifs in the supramolecular architectures, ii) processes that primarily use other non-covalent interactions such as ion-ion, ion-dipole, π–π stacking, cation-π, van der Waals and hydrophobic interactions, and iii) those that employ strong and directional metal-ligand bonds for the assembly process However, as the scale and degree of complexity of desired molecules increases, the assembly of small molecular units into large, discrete supramolecules becomes an increasingly daunting task This has been due in large part to the inability to completely control the directionality of the weak forces employed in the first two classifications above Coordination-driven self-assembly, which defines the third approach, affords a greater control over the rational design of 2D and 3D architectures by capitalizing on the predictable nature of the metal-ligand coordination sphere and ligand lability to encode directionality Thus, this third strategy represents an alternative route to better execute the “bottom-up” synthetic strategy for designing molecules of desired dimensions, ranging from a few cubic angstroms to over a cubic nanometer For instance, a wide array of 2D systems: rhomboids, squares, rectangles, triangles, etc, and 3D systems: trigonal pyramids, trigonal prisms, cubes, cuboctahedra, double squares, adamantanoids, dodecahedra and a variety of other cages have been reported As in nature, inherent preferences for particular geometries and binding motifs are ‘encoded’ in certain molecules depending on the metals and functional groups present; these moieties help to control the way in which the building blocks assemble into well-defined, discrete supramolecules4

Since the early pioneering work by Lehn5 and Sauvage6 on the feasibility and usefulness of coordination-driven self-assembly in the formation of infinite helicates, grids, ladders, racks, knots, rings, catenanes, rotaxanes and related species,7 several groups - Stang,8 Raymond,9 Fujita,10 Mirkin,11 Cotton12 and others13,14 have independently developed and exploited novel coordination-based paradigms for the self-assembly of discrete metallacycles and metallacages with well-defined shapes and sizes In the last decade, the concepts and perspectives of coordination-driven self-assembly have been delineated and summarized in several insightful reviews covering various aspects of coordinationdriven self-assembly15 In the last decade, the use of this synthetic strategy has led to metallacages dubbed as “molecular flasks” by Fujita,16 and Raymond and Bergman,17 which due to their ability to encapsulate guest molecules, allowed for the observation of unique chemical phenomena and unusual reactions which cannot be achieved in the conventional gas, liquid or solid phases Furthermore, these assemblies found applications in supramolecular catalysis18,19 and as nanomaterials as developed by Hupp20 and others21,22

This review focuses on the journey of early coordination-driven self-assembly paradigms to more complex and discrete 2D and 3D supramolecular ensembles over the last decade We begin with a discussion of various approaches that have been developed by different groups to assemble finite supramolecular architectures The subsequent sections contain detailed discussions on the synthesis of discrete 2D and 3D systems, their functionalizations and applications

Supramolecular coordination: self-assembly of finite two- and three-dimensional ensembles.

This critical review highlights supermolecular building blocks (SBBs) in the context of their impact upon the design, synthesis, and structure of metal–organic materials (MOMs). MOMs, also known as coordination polymers, hybrid inorganic–organic materials, and metal–organic frameworks, represent an emerging class of materials that have attracted the imagination of solid-state chemists because MOMs combine unprecedented levels of porosity with a range of other functional properties that occur through the metal moiety and/or the organic ligand. First generation MOMs exploited the geometry of metal ions or secondary building units (SBUs), small metal clusters that mimic polygons, for the generation of MOMs. In this critical review we examine the recent (<5 years) adoption of much larger scale metal–organic polyhedra (MOPs) as SBBs for the construction of MOMs by highlighting how the large size and high symmetry of such SBBs can afford improved control over the topology of the resulting MOM and a new level of scale to the resulting framework (204 references).

Design and synthesis of metal-organic frameworks using metal-organic polyhedra as supermolecular building blocks.

Recent Developments in the Preparation and Chemistry of Metallacycles and Metallacages via Coordination

The coupling of aryl or vinyl halides with terminal acetylenes catalysed by palladium and other transition metals, commonly termed as Sonogashira cross-coupling reaction, is one of the most important and widely used sp2–sp carbon–carbon bond formation reactions in organic synthesis, frequently employed in the synthesis of natural products, biologically active molecules, heterocycles, molecular electronics, dendrimers and conjugated polymers or nanostructures. This critical review focuses on developments in the Sonogashira reaction achieved in recent years concerning catalysts, reaction conditions and substrates (352 references).

Recent advances in Sonogashira reactions

Palladium nanoparticles (PdNPs) were used as a catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of a variety of benzofurans by Sonogashira cross-coupling reactions under ambient conditions. The catalyst could be recycled without significant loss in its activity.

/pdf/palladium-nanoparticles-catalyzed-synthesis-of-benzofurans-3ymgdz5vub.pdf

Palladium Nanoparticles Catalyzed Synthesis of Benzofurans by a Domino Approach

Self-assembly of ordered water tetramers in an encapsulated [Br(H2O)12]- complex.

The cryptand L can accommodate a Co(II) ion inside the cavity at the tren end, forming a CoN4 complex. The Co(II) ion further accepts a SCN- anion, forming a distorted trigonal bipyramidal complex....

A cobalt(II) cryptate of a heteroditopic cryptand L as an efficient oxygenation catalyst of organic substrates using molecular oxygen and 2-methylpropanal

Group 4 complexes of salicylbenzoxazole ligands as effective catalysts for the ring-opening polymerization of lactides, epoxides and copolymerization of ε-caprolactone with L-lactide

Helical self-assembled coordination complexes are broadly classified under linear and circular helicates. While the number of strands of the ligand units in a molecule of the linear helicates is used for further classifications such as single-stranded, double-stranded and so on, the circular helicates are not classified further. The compositions of helicates are considered as $$\hbox {M}_{x}\hbox {L}_{y}$$
 where the terms x and y stand for the number of metal ion(s) and ligand strands, respectively. However, more than one type of metal centers/ligand in helicates are also known. The linear helicates of a given number of strands are further classified under the number of metal centers such as binuclear, trinuclear and so on. Representative examples are included to exemplify the varieties of helicates. Synopsis: Helical self-assembled coordination complexes are broadly classified under linear and circular helicates. While the number of strands of the ligand units in the linear helicates is used for further classifications, the circular helicates are put all under one category. Representative examples are included to exemplify the varieties of helicates. Pictogram:

/pdf/linear-and-circular-helicates-a-brief-review-26mnidhqfs.pdf

Dillip Kumar Chand

Papers

Palladium Nanoparticles Catalyzed Synthesis of Benzofurans by a Domino Approach

Self-assembly of ordered water tetramers in an encapsulated [Br(H2O)12]- complex.

A cobalt(II) cryptate of a heteroditopic cryptand L as an efficient oxygenation catalyst of organic substrates using molecular oxygen and 2-methylpropanal

Group 4 complexes of salicylbenzoxazole ligands as effective catalysts for the ring-opening polymerization of lactides, epoxides and copolymerization of ε-caprolactone with L-lactide

Linear and circular helicates: A brief review