Most methanogenic archaea can reduce CO(2) with H(2) to methane, and it is generally assumed that the reactions and mechanisms of energy conservation that are involved are largely the same in all methanogens. However, this does not take into account the fact that methanogens with cytochromes have considerably higher growth yields and threshold concentrations for H(2) than methanogens without cytochromes. These and other differences can be explained by the proposal outlined in this Review that in methanogens with cytochromes, the first and last steps in methanogenesis from CO(2) are coupled chemiosmotically, whereas in methanogens without cytochromes, these steps are energetically coupled by a cytoplasmic enzyme complex that mediates flavin-based electron bifurcation.

Methanogenic archaea: ecologically relevant differences in energy conservation.

Although of limited metabolic diversity, methanogenic archaea or methanogens possess great phylogenetic and ecological diversity. Only three types of methanogenic pathways are known: CO(2)-reduction, methyl-group reduction, and the aceticlastic reaction. Cultured methanogens are grouped into five orders based upon their phylogeny and phenotypic properties. In addition, uncultured methanogens that may represent new orders are present in many environments. The ecology of methanogens highlights their complex interactions with other anaerobes and the physical and chemical factors controlling their function.

Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea.

In eukaryotes, the core promoter serves as a platform for the assembly of transcription preinitiation complex (PIC) that includes TFIIA, TFIIB, TFIID, TFIIE, TFIIF, TFIIH, and RNA polymerase II (pol II), which function collectively to specify the transcription start site. PIC formation usually begins with TFIID binding to the TATA box, initiator, and/or downstream promoter element (DPE) found in most core promoters, followed by the entry of other general transcription factors (GTFs) and pol II through either a sequential assembly or a preassembled pol II holoenzyme pathway. Formation of this promoter-bound complex is sufficient for a basal level of transcription. However, for activator-dependent (or regulated) transcription, general cofactors are often required to transmit regulatory signals between gene-specific activators and the general transcription machinery. Three classes of general cofactors, including TBP-associated factors (TAFs), Mediator, and upstream stimulatory activity (USA)-derived positive cofactors (PC1/PARP-1, PC2, PC3/DNA topoisomerase I, and PC4) and negative cofactor 1 (NC1/HMGB1), normally function independently or in combination to fine-tune the promoter activity in a gene-specific or cell-type-specific manner. In addition, other cofactors, such as TAF1, BTAF1, and negative cofactor 2 (NC2), can also modulate TBP or TFIID binding to the core promoter. In general, these cofactors are capable of repressing basal transcription when activators are absent and stimulating transcription in the presence of activators. Here we review the roles of these cofactors and GTFs, as well as TBP-related factors (TRFs), TAF-containing complexes (TFTC, SAGA, SLIK/SALSA, STAGA, and PRC1) and TAF variants, in pol II-mediated transcription, with emphasis on the events occurring after the chromatin has been remodeled but prior to the formation of the first phosphodiester bond.

The general transcription machinery and general cofactors.

Understanding the dynamics of methane (CH4) emissions is of paramount importance because CH4 has 25 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO2) and is currently the second most important anthropogenic greenhouse gas. Wetlands are the single largest natural CH4 source with median emissions from published studies of 164 Tg yr 1 , which is about a third of total global emissions. We provide a perspective on important new frontiers in obtaining a better understanding of CH4 dynamics in natural systems, with a focus on wetlands. One of the most exciting recent developments in this field is the attempt to integrate the different methodologies and spatial scales of biogeochemistry, molecular microbiology, and modeling, and thus this is a major focus of this review. Our specific objectives are to provide an up-to-date synthesis of estimates of global CH4 emissions from wetlands and other freshwater aquatic ecosystems, briefly summarize major biogeophysical controls over CH4 emissions from wetlands, suggest new frontiers in CH4 biogeochemistry, examine relationships between methanogen community structure and CH4 dynamics in situ, and to review the current generation of CH4 models. We highlight throughout some of the most pressing issues concerning global change and feedbacks on CH4 emissions from natural ecosystems. Major uncertainties in estimating current and future CH4 emissions from natural ecosystems include the following: (i) A number of important controls over CH4 production, consumption, and transport have not been, or are inadequately, incorporated into existing CH4 biogeochemistry models. (ii) Significant errors in regional and global emission estimates are derived from large spatial-scale extrapolations from highly heterogeneous and often poorly mapped wetland complexes. (iii) The limited number of observations of CH4 fluxes and their associated environmental variables loosely constrains the parameterization of process-based biogeochemistry models.

/pdf/methane-emissions-from-wetlands-biogeochemical-microbial-and-4fsuddj4v7.pdf

Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales

Our intestine is the site of an extraordinarily complex and dynamic environmentally transmitted consortial symbiosis. The molecular foundations of beneficial symbiotic host-bacterial relationships in the gut are being revealed in part from studies of simplified models of this ecosystem, where germ-free mice are colonized with specified members of the microbial community, and in part from comparisons of the genomes of members of the intestinal microbiota. The results emphasize the contributions of symbionts to postnatal gut development and host physiology, as well as the remarkable strategies these microorganisms have evolved to sustain their alliances. These points are illustrated by the human-Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron symbiosis. Interdisciplinary studies of the effects of the intestinal environment on genome structure and function should provide important new insights about how microbes and humans have coevolved mutually beneficial relationships and new perspectives about the foundations of our health.

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/100/18/10452.full.pdf

Honor thy symbionts

The Archaea remain the most poorly understood domain of life despite their importance to the biosphere. Methanogenesis, which plays a pivotal role in the global carbon cycle, is unique to the Archaea. Each year, an estimated 900 million metric tons of methane are biologically produced, representing the major global source for this greenhouse gas and contributing significantly to global warming (Schlesinger 1997). Methanogenesis is critical to the waste-treatment industry and biologically produced methane also represents an important alternative fuel source. At least two-thirds of the methane in nature is derived from acetate, although only two genera of methanogens are known to be capable of utilizing this substrate. We report here the first complete genome sequence of an acetate-utilizing (acetoclastic) methanogen, Methanosarcina acetivorans C2A.

The Methanosarcineae are metabolically and physiologically the most versatile methanogens. Only Methanosarcina species possess all three known pathways for methanogenesis (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) and are capable of utilizing no less than nine methanogenic substrates, including acetate. In contrast, all other orders of methanogens possess a single pathway for methanogenesis, and many utilize no more than two substrates. Among methanogens, the Methanosarcineae also display extensive environmental diversity. Individual species of Methanosarcina have been found in freshwater and marine sediments, decaying leaves and garden soils, oil wells, sewage and animal waste digesters and lagoons, thermophilic digesters, feces of herbivorous animals, and the rumens of ungulates (Zinder 1993). 



Figure 1

Three pathways for methanogenesis. Methanogenesis is a form of anaerobic respiration using a variety of one-carbon (C-1) compounds or acetic acid as a terminal electron acceptor. All three pathways converge on the reduction of methyl-CoM to methane (CH ...



The Methanosarcineae are unique among the Archaea in forming complex multicellular structures during different phases of growth and in response to environmental change (Fig. ​(Fig.2).2). Within the Methanosarcineae, a number of distinct morphological forms have been characterized, including single cells with and without a cell envelope, as well as multicellular packets and lamina (Macario and Conway de Macario 2001). Packets and lamina display internal morphological heterogeneity, suggesting the possibility of cellular differentiation. Moreover, it has been suggested that cells within lamina may display differential production of extracellular material, a potential form of cellular specialization (Macario and Conway de Macario 2001). The formation of multicellular structures has been proposed to act as an adaptation to stress and likely plays a role in the ability of Methanosarcina species to colonize diverse environments. 



Figure 2

Different morphological forms of Methanosarcina acetivorans. Thin-section electron micrographs showing M. acetivorans growing as both single cells (center of micrograph) and within multicellular aggregates (top left, bottom right). Cells were harvested ...



Significantly, powerful methods for genetic analysis exist for Methanosarcina species. These tools include plasmid shuttle vectors (Metcalf et al. 1997), very high efficiency transformation (Metcalf et al. 1997), random in vivo transposon mutagenesis (Zhang et al. 2000), directed mutagenesis of specific genes (Zhang et al. 2000), multiple selectable markers (Boccazzi et al. 2000), reporter gene fusions (M. Pritchett and W. Metcalf, unpubl.), integration vectors (Conway de Macario et al. 1996), and anaerobic incubators for large-scale growth of methanogens on solid media (Metcalf et al. 1998). Furthermore, and in contrast to other known methanogens, genetic analysis can be used to study the process of methanogenesis: Because Methanosarcina species are able to utilize each of the three known methanogenic pathways, mutants in a single pathway are viable (M. Pritchett and W. Metcalf, unpubl.). The availability of genetic methods allowing immediate exploitation of genomic sequence, coupled with the genetic, physiological, and environmental diversity of M. acetivorans make this species an outstanding model organism for the study of archaeal biology. For these reasons, we set out to study the genome of M. acetivorans.

/pdf/the-genome-of-m-acetivorans-reveals-extensive-metabolic-and-5fb79py5l6.pdf

Everly Conway de Macario

Papers

The Genome of M. Acetivorans Reveals Extensive Metabolic and Physiological Diversity