scispace - formally typeset
J

James D. Neaton

Researcher at University of Minnesota

Publications -  352
Citations -  68183

James D. Neaton is an academic researcher from University of Minnesota. The author has contributed to research in topics: Risk factor & Blood pressure. The author has an hindex of 101, co-authored 331 publications receiving 64719 citations. Previous affiliations of James D. Neaton include University of Pittsburgh & Medical Research Council.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Mortality differences between black and white men in the USA: contribution of income and other risk factors among men screened for the MRFIT. MRFIT Research Group. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial

TL;DR: Differentials in mortality from some specific causes do not simply reflect differences in income, however, and more detailed investigations are needed of how differences are influenced by environmental exposures, lifetime socioeconomic conditions, lifestyle, racism, and other sociocultural and biological factors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lifestyle intervention: results of the Treatment of Mild Hypertension Study (TOMHS).

TL;DR: These results support a role for lifestyle interventions as the initial treatment for stage 1 hypertension and demonstrate that such interventions can be successfully implemented in the clinical setting.
Journal ArticleDOI

ZIP-Code-based versus Tract-based Income Measures as Long-Term Risk-adjusted Mortality Predictors

TL;DR: The current study reports on 293,138 middle-aged men screened in 14 states in 1973-1975 for the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial and having 25-year mortality follow-up, finding patterns held across various causes of death, for both Blacks and non-Blacks, and with or without adjustment for ZIP-code-based income diversity or tract-based proportion below poverty.
Journal ArticleDOI

Prognostic value of exercise electrocardiogram in men at high risk of future coronary heart disease: Multiple risk factor intervention trial experience

TL;DR: Exercise testing may be indicated for improved risk assessment and the assessment of the significance of minor rest electrocardiographic abnormalities in middle-aged men with elevated levels of coronary heart disease risk factors.