scispace - formally typeset
J

Jayson L. Lusk

Researcher at Purdue University

Publications -  395
Citations -  16842

Jayson L. Lusk is an academic researcher from Purdue University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Willingness to pay & Common value auction. The author has an hindex of 63, co-authored 385 publications receiving 14769 citations. Previous affiliations of Jayson L. Lusk include San Diego State University & West Texas A&M University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Value elicitation in retail and laboratory environments

TL;DR: The authors compared results from laboratory and field valuation experiments and found that field valuations were greater than laboratory valuations. But they did not consider the impact of unengaged bidders.
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferences for environmental quality under uncertainty

TL;DR: This paper showed that measured preferences for final environmental states, water quality in this case, depend on whether people choose between final states or between lotteries over final states, and found significant under-weighting of low probability events related to water quality.
Journal ArticleDOI

Consumer demand for mandatory labeling of beef from cattle administered growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn

TL;DR: Estimates suggest that consumers would be willing to pay 17.0 percent and 10.6 percent higher prices for beef on average to obtain information provided via mandatory labeling about whether the beef is from cattle produced with growth hormones or fed genetically modified corn.
Journal ArticleDOI

Economic Assessment of FMDv Releases from the National Bio and Agro Defense Facility

TL;DR: This study evaluates the economic consequences of hypothetical foot-and-mouth disease releases from the future National Bio and Agro Defense Facility in Manhattan, Kansas and finds the distribution of economic impacts to be very significant.
Journal ArticleDOI

Distinguishing beliefs from preferences in food choice

TL;DR: In this paper, a distinction between preferences for health, safety and quality on the one hand and consumers' subjective beliefs that the products studied possess these attributes, on the other hand, was made.