scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "John G.F. Cleland published in 2007"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Rosuvastatin did not reduce the primary outcome or the number of deaths from any cause in older patients with systolic heart failure, although the drug did reduce the numberOf cardiovascular hospitalizations and the drugdid not cause safety problems.
Abstract: As compared with the placebo group, patients in the rosuvastatin group had de- creased levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (difference between groups, 45.0%; P<0.001) and of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (difference between groups, 37.1%; P<0.001). During a median follow-up of 32.8 months, the primary outcome occurred in 692 patients in the rosuvastatin group and 732 in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83 to 1.02; P = 0.12), and 728 patients and 759 patients, respectively, died (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05; P = 0.31). There were no significant differences between the two groups in the coronary outcome or death from cardiovascular causes. In a prespecified secondary analysis, there were fewer hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes in the rosuvastatin group (2193) than in the placebo group (2564) (P<0.001). No excessive episodes of muscle-related or other adverse events occurred in the rosuvastatin group. Conclusions Rosuvastatin did not reduce the primary outcome or the number of deaths from any cause in older patients with systolic heart failure, although the drug did reduce the number of cardiovascular hospitalizations. The drug did not cause safety problems. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00206310.)

1,355 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
03 May 2007-BMJ
TL;DR: Programmes for chronic heart failure that include remote monitoring have a positive effect on clinical outcomes in community dwelling patients with chronic heart Failure.
Abstract: Objective To determine whether remote monitoring (structured telephone support or telemonitoring) without regular clinic or home visits improves outcomes for patients with chronic heart failure Data sources 15 electronic databases, hand searches of previous studies, and contact with authors and experts Data extraction Two investigators independently screened the results Review methods Published randomised controlled trials comparing remote monitoring programmes with usual care in patients with chronic heart failure managed within the community Results 14 randomised controlled trials (4264 patients) of remote monitoring met the inclusion criteria: four evaluated telemonitoring, nine evaluated structured telephone support, and one evaluated both Remote monitoring programmes reduced the rates of admission to hospital for chronic heart failure by 21% (95% confidence interval 11% to 31%) and all cause mortality by 20% (8% to 31%); of the six trials evaluating health related quality of life three reported significant benefits with remote monitoring, and of the four studies examining healthcare costs with structured telephone support three reported reduced cost and one no effect Conclusion Programmes for chronic heart failure that include remote monitoring have a positive effect on clinical outcomes in community dwelling patients with chronic heart failure

669 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Oct 2007-Europace
TL;DR: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim to assist physicians in selecting the best management strategies for a typical patient, suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means.
Abstract: Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents summarize and evaluate all currently available evidence on a particular issue with the aim to assist physicians in selecting the best management strategies for a typical patient, suffering from a given condition, taking into account the impact on outcome, as well as the risk–benefit ratio of particular diagnostic or therapeutic means. Guidelines are no substitutes for textbooks. The legal implications of medical guidelines have been discussed previously. A great number of Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents have been issued in recent years by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as well as by other societies and organizations. Because of the impact on clinical practice, quality criteria for development of guidelines have been established in order to make all decisions transparent to the user. The recommendations for formulating and issuing ESC Guidelines and Expert Consensus Documents can be found on the ESC website (http://www.escardio.org/knowledge/guidelines/rules). In brief, experts in the field are selected and undertake a comprehensive review of the published evidence for management and/or prevention of a given condition. A critical evaluation of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is performed including the assessment of the risk/benefit ratio. Estimates of expected health outcomes for larger societies are included, where data exist. The level of evidence and the strength of recommendation of particular treatment options are weighed and graded according to pre-defined scales, as outlined in Tables 1 and 2 . View this table: Table 1 Classes of recommendations View this table: Table 2 Levels of evidence The experts of the writing panels have provided disclosure statements of all relationships they may have which might be perceived as real or potential sources of conflicts of interest. These disclosure forms are kept on file at the European Heart House, headquarters of the ESC. Any changes in conflict of interest that arise during the writing period must be notified …

660 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: WRF predicts substantially higher rates of mortality and hospitalization in patients with HF and the severity of WRF was also associated with greater mortality.

549 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
07 Nov 2007-JAMA
TL;DR: The endothelin receptor antagonist tezosentan did not improve symptoms or clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure and was not associated with worse outcomes.
Abstract: ContextPlasma concentrations of the vasoconstrictor peptide endothelin-1 are increased in patients with heart failure, and higher concentrations are associated with worse outcomes. Tezosentan is an intravenous short-acting endothelin receptor antagonist that has favorable hemodynamic actions in heart failure.ObjectiveTo determine if tezosentan improves outcomes in patients with acute heart failure.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThe Value of Endothelin Receptor Inhibition With Tezosentan in Acute Heart Failure Studies, 2 independent, identical, and concurrent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials conducted from April 2003 through January 2005 at sites in Australia, Europe, Israel, and North America. Patients admitted within the previous 24 hours with persisting dyspnea and a respiratory rate of 24/min or greater were eligible provided they fulfilled 2 of 4 criteria: (1) elevated plasma concentrations of B-type or N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide, (2) clinical pulmonary edema, (3) radiologic pulmonary congestion or edema, or (4) left ventricular systolic dysfunction.InterventionInfusion of tezosentan (5 mg/h for 30 minutes, followed by 1 mg/h for 24 to 72 hours [n = 730]) or placebo (n = 718).Main Outcome MeasuresThe coprimary end points were change in dyspnea (measured at 3, 6, and 24 hours using a visual analog scale from 0-100) over 24 hours (as area under the curve) in the individual trials and incidence of death or worsening heart failure at 7 days in both trials combined.ResultsOf the 1435 patients who received treatment as assigned, 855 (60%) were men; mean age was 70 years. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (measured in 779 patients [54%]) was 29% (SD, 11%). Baseline dyspnea scores were similar in the 2 treatment groups. Tezosentan did not improve dyspnea more than placebo in either trial, with a mean treatment difference of −12 (95% confidence interval [CI], −105 to 81) mm · h (P = .80) in the first trial and −25 (95% CI, −119 to 69) mm · h (P = .60) in the second. The incidence of death or worsening heart failure at 7 days in the combined trials was 26% in each treatment group (odds ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.21; P = .95).ConclusionThe endothelin receptor antagonist tezosentan did not improve symptoms or clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure.Trial Registrationclinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00525707 (VERITAS-1) and NCT00524433 (VERITAS-2).

368 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM) score provides information about the likely mode of death among ambulatory heart failure patients and whether such information might predict responses to or cost-effectiveness of specific medications or devices inheart failure patients.
Abstract: Background— Prognosis and mode of death in heart failure patients are highly variable in that some patients die suddenly (often from ventricular arrhythmia) and others die of progressive failure of cardiac function (pump failure). Prediction of mode of death may facilitate decisions about specific medications or devices. Methods and Results— We used the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), a validated prediction model for total mortality in heart failure, to assess the mode of death in 10 538 ambulatory patients with New York Heart Association class II to IV heart failure and predominantly systolic dysfunction enrolled in 6 randomized trials or registries. During 16 735 person-years of follow-up, 2014 deaths occurred, which included 1014 sudden deaths and 684 pump-failure deaths. Compared with a SHFM score of 0, patients with a score of 1 had a 50% higher risk of sudden death, patients with a score of 2 had a nearly 3-fold higher risk, and patients with a score of 3 or 4 had a nearly 7-fold higher risk (P<...

276 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Jul 2007-Europace
TL;DR: Transvenous CRT system implantation, using a CS lead designed for long-term LV pacing, was safe and reliable, and as implanting centres become more experienced, this success rate is expected to increase further.
Abstract: Aims To assess procedural characteristics and adjudicated procedure-related (≤30 days) major adverse events among patients who underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation in the CARE-HF study. The CARE-HF study shows that CRT improves symptoms and reduces morbidity and mortality in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, safe and proper implantation of pacing systems remains key to effective CRT delivery. Methods and results Generalized linear modeling was used to examine the relationships between first implant success/failure and: NYHA class; beta-adrenergic blocker use; underlying ischemic vs. non-ischemic heart disease; history of coronary artery bypass graft or valve surgery; left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume ≤ vs. >300 cm3; and, influence of the participating study-centres. Implantation was attempted in 404/409 patients assigned to CRT, and in 65/404 patients assigned to medical therapy. Among these 469 patients, 450 (95.9%) received a successfully implanted and activated device. Complications occurred within 24 h in 47 patients (10.0%), mainly lead dislodgments ( n = 10, 2.1%) and coronary sinus dissection/perforation ( n = 10, 2.1%), and between 24 h and 30 days in 26 patients (5.5%), mainly lead dislodgment ( n = 13, 2.8%). Mean LV lead stimulation threshold was significantly higher than at the right atrium or right ventricle, though remained stable, delivering effective, and reliable CRT. Implanting experience was the only predictor of procedural outcome. Conclusion Transvenous CRT system implantation, using a CS lead designed for long-term LV pacing, was safe and reliable. As implanting centres become more experienced, this success rate is expected to increase further.

163 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Patients with echocardiographic evidence of more severe cardiac dyssynchrony and low systolic blood pressure obtain greater benefit from CRT, although benefits were substantial across the range of subjects included in the trial.
Abstract: Aims The cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure trial (CARE-HF) demonstrated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure and cardiac dyssynchrony. The aim of this study was to develop a prognostic model to evaluate the relationship between prospectively defined patient characteristics and treatment on the trial primary outcome of death from any cause or unplanned hospitalization for a major cardiovascular event. Methods and results A total of 813 patients were enrolled in the CARE-HF study and were followed for a mean of 29.4 months. A Cox Proportional Hazards Model was fitted to identify predictors of the primary outcome and any predictors that modified the effect of CRT. Ischaemic aetiology, more severe mitral regurgitation and increased N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, were associated with an increased risk of death or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization irrespective of cardiac resynchronization [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.89, 95% CI 1.45–2.46, HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.38–2.12 and HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.17–1.47, respectively] and increasing systolic blood pressure with a decreasing risk of an event (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.00). The benefits of cardiac resynchronization were modified by systolic blood pressure and interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD). Patients with increasing systolic blood pressure appear to receive reduced benefit from CRT (HR 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.03), whereas those patients with more severe IVMD appear to benefit more from treatment (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98–1.00). Conclusion Patients with echocardiographic evidence of more severe cardiac dyssynchrony and low systolic blood pressure obtain greater benefit from CRT, although benefits were substantial across the range of subjects included in the trial.

161 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: CRT exerts an early and sustained reduction in NT-pro-BNP, which appears to reflect improvements in ventricular function and may be a simple method for monitoring the effects of CRT.
Abstract: Aims The Cardiac Resynchronization-Heart Failure (CARE-HF) study demonstrated that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) could reduce morbidity and mortality and improve cardiac function in patients with moderate or severe heart failure secondary to left ventricular systolic dysfunction and markers of cardiac dyssynchrony. The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the effect of CRT on plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP), a powerful marker of cardiac dysfunction and prognosis. Methods and results Blood samples were collected routinely at baseline and 3 and 18 months. Plasma was separated by cool centrifugation and stored at −70°C until transported to a central laboratory for analysis of NT-pro-BNP using a standard commercial assay. Cardiac function was assessed echocardiographically. At baseline, median plasma concentration of NT-pro-BNP was similar in patients assigned to CRT or medical therapy [1920 pg/mL (inter-quartile range (IQR) 744–4288) and 1809 pg/mL (IQR 719–3949), respectively]. The differences in medians between the CRT and medical therapy groups were highly significant at both 3 months (537 pg/mL; P < 0.0001) and 18 months of follow-up (567 pg/mL; P < 0.0001). These differences could not be accounted for by changes in pharmacological therapy or renal function but were associated with improvement in ventricular volumes and function. Conclusion CRT exerts an early and sustained reduction in NT-pro-BNP. This appears to reflect improvements in ventricular function. NT-pro-BNP may be a simple method for monitoring the effects of CRT.

146 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
01 Aug 2007-Heart
TL;DR: A high prevalence and incidence of diabetes is found in patients with heart failure over a course of 5 years, and new onset diabetes is more likely to occur during treatment with metoprolol than duringtreatment with carvedilol.
Abstract: Background: β Blocker treatment may worsen glucose metabolism. Objective: To study the development of new onset diabetes in a large cohort of patients with heart failure treated with either metoprolol or carvedilol. Design: Prospective and retrospective analysis of a controlled clinical trial. Setting: Multinational multicentre study. Patients: 3029 patients with chronic heart failure. Interventions: Randomly assigned treatment with carvedilol (n = 1511, target dose 50 mg daily) or metoprolol tartrate (n = 1518, target dose 100 mg daily). Results: Diabetic events (diabetic coma, peripheral gangrene, diabetic foot, decreased glucose tolerance or hyperglycaemia) and new onset diabetes (clinical diagnosis, repeated high random glucose level or glucose lowering drugs) were assessed in 2298 patients without diabetes at baseline. Diabetic events occurred in 122/1151 (10.6%) patients in the carvedilol group and 149/1147 (13.0%) patients in the metoprolol group (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61 to 0.99; p = 0.039). New onset diabetes was diagnosed in 119/1151 (10.3%) v 145/1147 (12.6%) cases in the carvedilol and metoprolol treatment groups (HR = 0.78, CI 0.61 to 0.997; p = 0.048), respectively. Patients with diabetes at baseline had an increased mortality compared with non-diabetic subjects (45.3% v 33.9%; HR = 1.45, CI 1.28 to 1.65). Both diabetic and non-diabetic subjects at baseline had a similar reduction in mortality with carvedilol compared with metoprolol (RR = 0.85; CI 0.69 to 1.06 and RR = 0.82; CI 0.71 to 0.94, respectively). Conclusion: A high prevalence and incidence of diabetes is found in patients with heart failure over a course of 5 years. New onset diabetes is more likely to occur during treatment with metoprolol than during treatment with carvedilol.

146 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Preserved systolic function, multiple co-morbidities, and high mortality are observed in octogenarian with HF, and the management of octogenarians with HF does not follow international guidelines.
Abstract: Aims Here, the aim is to study the management of octogenarians hospitalized for heart failure in Euro Heart Failure Survey I. Heart Failure (HF) is common in older people and associated with poor outcome. Methods and results We compared clinical characteristics, treatment, and short-term outcomes in 2780 octogenarians (group A, median age 85 years) and in 7912 younger patients (group B, median age 69 years) enrolled in the Euro Heart Failure Survey I. There were 37% males in group A vs. 59% in group B ( P < 0.001). Co-morbidities were more common in group A. Ejection fraction was measured only in 38% in group A vs. 65% in group B ( P < 0.001) and when measured was preserved in 50 vs. 40% ( P < 0.001). In-hospital and 12 weeks follow-up mortality were, respectively, 13 vs. 5% ( P < 0.001) and 12 vs. 6% ( P < 0.001) in groups A and B. Acute cardiac conditions and co-morbidity predicted mortality, whereas the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) and beta-blockers was associated with a better outcome. ACE-I and beta-blockers were used in 50 vs. 66% ( P < 0.001) and 24 vs. 42% ( P < 0.001) in groups A and B, respectively, whereas diuretics, digitalis, and nitrates were more commonly used in octogenarians. Conclusion Preserved systolic function, multiple co-morbidities, and high mortality are observed in octogenarians with HF. In these patients, cardiac function is assessed in only a minority and treatments known to improve prognosis in younger patients under-utilized. Overall, the management of octogenarians with HF does not follow international guidelines.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: It is unclear whether beta‐blocker therapy should be reduced or withdrawn in patients who develop acute decompensated heart failure (HF), but the relationship between changes in beta-blocker dose and outcome in patients surviving a HF hospitalisation in COMET is studied.
Abstract: Background It is unclear whether beta-blocker therapy should be reduced or withdrawn in patients who develop acute decompensated heart failure (HF). We studied the relationship between changes in beta-blocker dose and outcome in patients surviving a HF hospitalisation in COMET. Methods Patients hospitalised for HF were subdivided on the basis of the beta-blocker dose administered at the visit following hospitalisation, compared to that administered before. Results In COMET, 752/3029 patients (25%, 361 carvedilol and 391 metoprolol) had a non-fatal HF hospitalisation while on study treatment. Of these, 61 patients (8%) had beta-blocker treatment withdrawn, 162 (22%) had a dose reduction and 529 (70%) were maintained on the same dose. One-and two-year cumulative mortality rates were 28.7% and 44.6% for patients withdrawn from study medication, 37.4% and 51.4% for those with a reduced dosage (n.s.) and 19.1% and 32.5% for those maintained on the same dose (HR,1.59; 95%CI, 1.28-1.98; p Conclusions HF hospitalisations are associated with a high subsequent mortality. The risk of death is higher in patients who discontinue beta-blocker therapy or have their dose reduced. The increase in mortality is only partially explained by the worse prognostic profile of these patients.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The EuroHeart Failure survey identified 11,327 patients hospitalised with a suspected diagnosis of heart failure from 115 hospitals in 24 countries as mentioned in this paper, and ECGs were obtained from 9315 patients, of whom 5934 had cardiac imaging tests.
Abstract: Background: Most patients suspected of having heart failure (HF) will get a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) but its utility for excluding HF or assisting in its management has rarely been investigated.Methods: The EuroHeart Failure survey identified 11,327 patients hospitalised with a suspected diagnosis of HF from 115 hospitals in 24 countries. ECGs were obtained from 9315 patients, of whom 5934 had cardiac imaging tests. The utility of the ECG was assessed for excluding or diagnosing major structural heart disease (MSHD) or major left ventricular systolic dysfunction (MLVSD) and for therapeutic decision making.Findings: MSHD was present in 70% and MLVSD in 54% of patients overall but in only 21% and 5%, respectively, if the ECG was entirely normal. However, = 120 ms or anterior pathological Q-waves had a probability >80% of MSHD and >70% of MLVSD. Diagnostic models suggested that electrocardiographic criteria alone were not accurate for the diagnosis or exclusion of important heart disease in this population. However, 2468 patients (42%) had an electrocardiographic finding that should be used to guide the choice of therapy.Conclusions: A normal ECG is rare in patients with suspected HF but has limited diagnostic value in this setting. The ECG has an important role in guiding therapy. (C) 2006 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Patients with CHF and LVSD have increased serum concentrations of hsCRP that are related to functional limitation and prognosis but not to the severity of LV ejection fraction.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Plasma levels of N‐terminal pro‐brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐pro BNP) are increased in patients with chronic heart failure and Beta‐blockers may influence these levels but it is unclear whether changes in NT‐ pro BNP reflect concomitant changes in prognosis.
Abstract: Background Plasma levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP) are increased in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Beta-blockers (BB) may influence these levels but it is unclear whether changes in NT-pro BNP reflect concomitant changes in prognosis. Objectives To assess the prognostic importance of NT-pro BNP at baseline and during follow-up, in patients in whom beta-blocker therapy is initiated. Methods In COMET, 3029 patients with CHF in NYHA class II–IV and EF<35% were randomised to carvedilol or metoprolol tartrate and were followed for an average of 58 months. Blood samples were collected for the measurement of NT-pro BNP at baseline (n=1559) and during follow-up (n=309). Results Baseline plasma concentrations of NT-pro BNP above the median (1242 pg/ml) were associated with higher all-cause mortality (RR 2.77; 95% CI 2.33–3.3, p<0.001). Patients who achieved NT-pro BNP levels <400 pg/ml during follow-up had a lower subsequent mortality (RR 0.32; 95% CI 0.15–0.69, p=0.004). Conclusions The plasma concentration of NT-pro BNP is a powerful predictor of mortality in patients with CHF. Patients who achieve an NT-pro BNP of <400 pg/ml subsequent to treatment with a beta-blocker have a favourable prognosis.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: There are limited data on recall and implementation of lifestyle advice in patients with heart failure (HF) and the use of these guidelines is likely to vary between patients.
Abstract: Background There are limited data on recall and implementation of lifestyle advice in patients with heart failure (HF). Aim To investigate what advice patients with HF recall being given, and whether they report following the advice they remember. Methods and results 3261 patients with suspected HF participating in the EuroHeart Failure Survey were interviewed by a health professional 12weeks after hospital discharge. Patients recalled receiving 46% of pre-specified items of advice and 67% reported that they followed these completely. Both recall (53%) and implementation (71%) was best in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD). In multivariate analysis, younger age, male sex, patient awareness of the condition and patients reporting that they received a clear explanation of the diagnosis by a health professional, all factors associated with having LVSD, were the strongest predictors of recall. Conclusions Recall of and adherence to advice by patients with HF in this large European cross-sectional survey was disappointing. Responsibility for patient education lies with health professionals who should ensure that patients receive and understand advice, and are able to recall and follow it. A greater awareness of the issues surrounding lifestyle advice and more evidence supporting its value could improve patient care.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure, presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2007.
Abstract: This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure, presented at the European Society of Cardiology Congress 2007. Unpublished reports should be considered as preliminary data, as analyses may change in the final publication.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Treatment of heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is effective, but many patients are not treated in accordance with guidelines, which may reflect a lack of adequate organisation of care or co‐morbidity contra‐indicating therapy.
Abstract: Background: Treatment of heart failure (HF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) is effective, but many patients are not treated in accordance with guidelines. This may reflect a lack of adequate organisation of care or co-morbidity contra-indicating therapy. Aims: To evaluate the effect of co-morbidities on the prescription of neurohormonal antagonists for HF. Methods and results: The EuroHeart Failure Survey identified 10,701 patients with suspected or confirmed HF during 2000 and 2001, 64% of whom had an imaging test and 3658 had documented LVSD. This last group constitutes the focus of this report. Renal dysfunction was associated with lower prescription of ACE inhibitors at discharge (74% vs. 83%, p<0.001). Beta-blockers were less often used in patients with respiratory disease (32% vs. 53%, p<0.001). Co-morbidity did not appear to affect the use of spironolactone. There were few important international differences in uptake of key therapies amongst European countries with widely differing cultures and economic status. Conclusions: Guidelines appear successful in creating a relatively uniform approach to the treatment for HF due to LVSD in diverse medical cultures. Relevant co-morbidity seems to be responsible for a substantial reduction in the prescription of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers. However, whilst co-morbidity indicates the need for greater caution, it is often not a valid contra-indication to life-saving therapy.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: RAS is common in patients with chronic HF, especially among patients with RD and is a predictor of a poor clinical outcome, and interventional trials on renal revascularization are underway that may provide evidence on how best to manage RAS.
Abstract: Our aim was to determine the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality associated with the presence of significant renal artery stenosis (RAS) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF), and to explore the use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and diuretics in this population during a 3-year follow-up period. We identified 97 patients with significant renal dysfunction (RD, defined as a calculated glomerular filtration rate of 50% using magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries was used to define significant RAS. Seventy-three (54%) patients had significant RAS of ≥1 artery. Mean follow-up time was 37.3 (± 7.9) months. Compared with patients with no significant RAS, these patients were on higher doses of diuretics, lower doses of ACE inhibitors, had prolonged hospital admissions, were admitted with exacerbation of HF, and had a higher mortality (p = 0.007 for mortality). In conclusion, RAS is common in patients with chronic HF, especially among patients with RD and is a predictor of a poor clinical outcome. Interventional trials on renal revascularization are underway that contain subsets of patients with HF that may provide evidence on how best to manage RAS in this setting.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Data acquired from the first 50% of exercise and below the VCP provide adequate prognostic surrogates in patients who may not be able to perform maximal exercise testing, and should be calculated from all data points to optimise prognostic sensitivity.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article, the authors explored whether vascular protection by carvedilol could contribute to its superior effects in the treatment of heart failure compared with metoprolol tartrate in the COMET (Carvedilol Or Metoprololine European Trial) study.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Approximately one third of patients with chronic heart failure have left bundle branch block (LBBB) on their 12‐lead ECG.
Abstract: Background Approximately one third of patients with chronic heart failure have left bundle branch block (LBBB) on their 12-lead ECG. Methods and results 1418 consecutive patients (average (SD) age 70.5 (10.4) years; 74% male) first seen in a community heart failure clinic between December 2001 and June 2006 had a 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG). 485 (34%) had a QRS duration ≥ 120ms. Patients with a broad QRS were older (72.2 v 69.3years), had worse left ventricular systolic function, were on a higher daily dose of diuretic and were more likely to be on amiodarone (14.4 v 7.1%). 12 lead ECG was available for 734 patients (52%) at 1year follow up. The QRS interval increased from 115.1ms at baseline to 117.6 (P<0.0001). There were 52 incident cases of LBBB, an incidence of 10.9%. The only predictors of incident LBBB were QRS duration at baseline and amiodarone use at baseline. The proportion of patients with LBBB increased from 34.0% at baseline to 36.7%, 37.7% and 42.3% at 1, 2 and 3 years follow up, respectively. Baseline LBBB was associated with a worse outcome (HR 1.25 (95% CI 1.01–1.55). New LBBB was an independent adverse prognostic feature (HR 2.09 (95% CI 1.17–3.73); P=0.013). Conclusions The crude incidence of LBBB is 10.9% in the first year of follow up in an unselected population of ambulatory outpatients with chronic stable heart failure. Ongoing care of patients with chronic heart failure should include a regular 12 lead electrocardiogram.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To examine the criterion validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Geriatric Depression Scale 15‐item (GDS‐15) in a community sample of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) out‐patients, a large number of patients were diagnosed with CHF.
Abstract: Objective To examine the criterion validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Geriatric Depression Scale 15-item (GDS-15) in a community sample of Chronic Heart Failure (CHF) out-patients. Methods Eighty-eight of 203 older adults with confirmed CHF responded to a postal survey and participated in a face-to-face interview. The GDS-15 and HADS were compared to diagnoses from the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I), using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity and specificity for various cut-off points. Results For all depressive disorders, the area under the ROC curve for the GDS-15 was 0.883 and a cut-off of 5 gave a sensitivity of 0.818 and a specificity of 0.833. The area under the ROC curve for the HADS Depression (D) and Anxiety (A) were 0.889 and 0.941 respectively. At a cut-off of 7, the HADS-A gave a sensitivity of 0.938 and a specificity of 0.847. At a cut-off of 4, the HADS-D gave a sensitivity of 0.864 and a specificity of 0.788. Conclusions The GDS-15 and HADS are valid screening tools for detecting depression in aged CHF out-patients. However, use of the HADS requires reduced cut-points to ensure that patients with mood disorder are not missed in this population. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Treatment with amiodarone was associated with an increased risk of death from circulatory failure independent of functional class and this difference was maintained in multivariable analysis.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: To the Editor: Recent studies have shown a poor prognosis for patients with heart failure who have a normal ejection fraction, a finding that differs markedly from the results of randomized, controlled trials.
Abstract: To the Editor: Recent studies have shown a poor prognosis for patients with heart failure who have a normal ejection fraction,1 a finding that differs markedly from the results of randomized, controlled trials.2,3 This discrepancy requires an explanation. Many patients with heart failure who have serious, common coexisting illnesses, such as pulmonary disease, atrial fibrillation, and renal dysfunction (all of which are both markers and mediators of a worse outcome), are excluded from randomized, controlled trials for two obvious reasons. First, heart failure with a normal ejection fraction is largely a diagnosis of exclusion, and patients with coexisting illnesses . . .

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure, presented at the American College of Cardiology meeting in March 2007.
Abstract: This article provides information and a commentary on trials relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure, presented at the American College of Cardiology meeting in March 2007. Unpublished reports should be considered as preliminary data, as analyses may change in the final publication.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Cholesterol lowering with statins reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with CAD who do not have HF and might also have improved outcome in patientsWith HF had they not been excluded from the reported trials, this article examines this cholesterol paradox and possible mechanisms.
Abstract: Heart failure (HF) is a common and serious condition that is usually due to coronary artery disease (CAD). Hypercholesterolemia is a major risk factor for CAD but, paradoxically, patients with advanced HF often have low cholesterol, which is associated with a poor prognosis. Cholesterol lowering with statins reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with CAD who do not have HF and might also have improved outcome in patients with HF had they not been excluded from the reported trials. The results of large trials such as the Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Study in Heart Failure (CORONA) and the Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Sopravvivenza nell'Infarto Miocardico-Insufficienza Cardiaca (GISSI-HF) study addressing the effects of rosuvastatin in HF are keenly awaited. In addition to cholesterol lowering, statins have other biologic effects that might be responsible for some of their favorable effects. This article examines this cholesterol paradox and possible mechanisms.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: After hospitalization for HF, many patients do not recall nonpharmacologic advice and a substantial proportion of those who recall the advice follow it incompletely, and younger age and prescription of appropriate pharmacologic treatment are associated with higher rates of recall and implementation.
Abstract: Advice on lifestyle, diet, vaccination, and therapy are part of the standard management of heart failure (HF). However, there is little information on whether patients with HF recall receiving such recommendations and, if so, whether they report following them. We obtained information on the recall of and adherence to nonpharmacologic advice from patients enrolled in the EuroHeart Failure Survey. This article focuses on 2,331 patients who had a clinical diagnosis of HF during the index admission and attended an interview 12 weeks after discharge. Their mean age was 67 ± 12 years and 38% were women. Patients recalled receiving 4.1 ± 2.7 items of advice with higher rates in Central Europe and the Mediterranean region. Recall of dietary advice (cholesterol or fat intake, 63%; dietary salt, 60%) was higher than for some other interventions (influenza vaccination, 36%; avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 17%). Among those who recalled the advice, a substantial proportion indicated that they did not follow advice completely (cholesterol and fat intake, 61%; dietary salt, 63%; influenza vaccination, 75%; avoidance of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 80%), although few patients indicated they ignored the advice completely. Patients who recalled >4 items versus ≤4 items of advice were younger and more often received angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (71% vs 62%), β-blockers (51% vs 38%), and spironolactone (25% vs 21%). In conclusion, after hospitalization for HF, many patients do not recall nonpharmacologic advice. In addition, a substantial proportion of those who recall the advice follow it incompletely. Younger age and prescription of appropriate pharmacologic treatment are associated with higher rates of recall and implementation.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors conducted an analysis of the 813 participants of the Cardiac Resynchronisation in Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trial to determine the effect of CRT on the risk of complications and death in diabetic compared with nondiabetic heart failure patients.
Abstract: Diabetes is a well-known and important risk factor for heart disease, including heart failure (1–4). Despite improvements in pharmacologic treatment, many patients with heart failure have severe and persistent symptoms, and their prognosis remains poor (5,6). While most recent data indicate a higher mortality rate in diabetic patients with heart failure compared with nondiabetic patients (7–9), it is unresolved whether this effect might be limited to patients with ischemic heart disease and/or patients on insulin therapy (10–13). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces symptoms and improves left ventricular function and prognosis in many patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure due to systolic dysfunction and cardiac dyssynchrony (14–19). The pathophysiology underlying heart failure in diabetic patients differs from that in nondiabetic patients and is generally considered more progressive. Thus, direct and indirect effects of diabetes on myopathic mechanisms might influence the response of heart failure patients to CRT. We conducted an analysis of the 813 participants of the Cardiac Resynchronisation in Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trial to determine the effect of CRT on the risk of complications and death in diabetic compared with nondiabetic heart failure patients. We also tested the hypothesis that diabetes has a prognostic impact in patients with heart failure. The CARE-HF trial (14,20–22) investigated the effects of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in patients receiving standard pharmacologic therapy …

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: This article provides information and a commentary on trials presented at the American Heart Association meeting held in November 2006, relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure.
Abstract: This article provides information and a commentary on trials presented at the American Heart Association meeting held in November 2006, relevant to the pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of heart failure. All reports should be considered as preliminary data, as analyses may change in the final publication.The OAT study failed to show a benefit of PCI over optimal medical therapy in patients with persistent total occlusion of the infarct related artery following a myocardial infarction. In SALT I and 2, tolvaptan was found to correct hyponatraerma of various aetiologies; however, whether this has an impact on heart failure prognosis requires further evaluation. A placebo controlled study of myocardial implantation of skeletal myoblasts in patients with moderate to severe LVSD (MAGIC) showed equivocal/uncertain effects, long term follow-up data are awaited. The ABCD study which compared the ability of an invasive and a non-invasive test to identify patients at risk of arrhythmic events prior to ICD implantation, suggested that the two strategies were comparable, although the practical value of either test remains uncertain and the study had many major flaws. The PABA-CHF study hinted that pulmonary vein antrum isolation might be more effective than AV node ablation with bi-ventricular pacing for the treatment of patients with heart failure in atrial fibrillation. In IMPROVE-CHF, an NT-pro BNP guided treatment strategy was found to reduce the cost of managing patients with acute breathlessness. (c) 2006 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.