The American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) is an independent organization devoted to the development of standards.

American Society for Testing and Materials

「脆弱性(Vulnerability)」とは何か

Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures provides requirements for general structural design and includes means for determining dead, live, soil, flood, wind, snow, rain, atmospheric ice, and earthquake loads, as well as their combinations, which are suitable for inclusion in building codes and other documents. This Standard, a revision of ASCE/SEI 7-05, offers a complete update and reorganization of the wind load provisions, expanding them from one chapter into six. The Standard contains new ultimate event wind maps with corresponding reductions in load factors, so that the loads are not affected, and updates the seismic loads with new risk-targeted seismic maps. The snow, live, and atmospheric icing provisions are updated as well. In addition, the Standard includes a detailed Commentary with explanatory and supplementary information designed to assist building code committees and regulatory authorities. Standard ASCE/SEI 7 is an integral part of building codes in the United States. Many of the load provisions are substantially adopted by reference in the International Building Code and the NFPA 5000 Building Construction and Safety Code. Structural engineers, architects, and those engaged in preparing and administering local building codes will find this Standard an essential reference in their practice. Note: New orders are fulfilled from the second printing, which incorporates the errata to the first printing.

Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures

Trees, and their derivative products, have been used by societies around the world for thousands of years. Contemporary construction of tall buildings from timber, in whole or in part, suggests a growing interest in the potential for building with wood at a scale not previously attainable. As wood is the only significant building material that is grown, we have a natural inclination that building in wood is good for the environment. But under what conditions is this really the case? The environmental benefits of using timber are not straightforward; although it is a natural product, a large amount of energy is used to dry and process it. Much of this can come from the biomass of the tree itself, but that requires investment in plant, which is not always possible in an industry that is widely distributed among many small producers. And what should we build with wood? Are skyscrapers in timber a good use of this natural resource, or are there other aspects of civil and structural engineering, or large-scale infrastructure, that would be a better use of wood? Here, we consider a holistic picture ranging in scale from the science of the cell wall to the engineering and global policies that could maximise forestry and timber construction as a boon to both people and the planet.

The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction

The Structural Engineering Institute of the American Society of Civil Engineers Committee on the Reliability-Based Design of Wood Structures recently completed a special project entitled “The next step for ASCE 16: Performance-based design of wood structures.” This paper presents the methodology and several illustrative examples of the design of residential wood-frame buildings for flood. The control variable of interest is losses in terms of either U.S. dollars or percent of construction costs. To do this, assembly-based vulnerability is coupled with existing durability data for wood and wood-based products; and when not available, logical assumptions were required. A series of illustrative examples are shown with various mitigation strategies applied to investigate the change in loss fragilities, and subsequently, economic risk if the fragility is recoupled with the flood hazard curve. The method is shown to work efficiently and the results are logical, thus it may find application by aiding developers, land-use planners, engineers, and potentially owners of wood-frame buildings in their design and retrofit decisions.

Performance-Based Design of Residential Wood-Frame Buildings for Flood Based on Manageable Loss

Tsunami bore forces on a compliant residential building model

Current design codes and standards in the United States focus on the design of individual facilities and do not account for other coupled physical and nonphysical infrastructure. This does ...

Community-Resilience-Based Design of the Built Environment

Communities are changing the way they manage flood risk as a result of climate change which increases both the flood hazard intensity and frequency and therefore results in more flood exposure for the built environment. Quantifying the feasibility of policy changes requires a standardized approach that can allow a risk-informed decision. The current body of flood risk mitigation research is populated with a host of qualitative approaches to reduce flood risk at the building- and community-level. However, quantitative effects on physical infrastructure within the community at a detailed level, i.e. component- and building-level, are needed to provide decision-support for policymakers. In this study, a high-resolution quantitative approach is developed to determine the effect of policy change on flood losses at the community-level by integrating building information models with the community topology. This approach uses a portfolio of building archetypes to model flood vulnerability at the community-level. For each archetype within this portfolio, a systematic approach was developed to propagate uncertainties in the flood damage for each component within the building and thereby providing the total building damage in terms of exceedance probability of a set of prescribed damage states. The developed approach was used to investigate an array of community-level mitigation options that could control both the flood hazard and flood exposure. The analysis of an example community revealed that one mitigation policy is not enough to provide efficient flood protection and a suite of diverse mitigation techniques working in concert is more effective for major flood protection.

High-resolution flood risk approach to quantify the impact of policy change on flood losses at community-level

The understanding of, and ability to predict, the seismic behavior of woodframe structures has improved immensely in the last 10 years. Two notable projects occurred in succession, the Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering (CUREE) and California Institute of Technology (Caltech) CUREE-Caltech Woodframe Project, and the Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES) NEESWood Project, which provided greater understanding, improved analytical modeling, and advances in force- and performance-based seismic design (PBSD) of woodframe buildings, respectively. The NEESWood project focused on the development of a PBSD philosophy (and procedures) for midrise woodframe buildings and included full-scale system-level validation. To date, the complete design procedure has not been systematically explained, which serves as the impetus for this paper. While the method was shown to be quite viable, some challenges remain, including identifying a format that would facilitate widesp...

John W. van de Lindt

Papers

Performance-Based Design of Residential Wood-Frame Buildings for Flood Based on Manageable Loss

Tsunami bore forces on a compliant residential building model

Community-Resilience-Based Design of the Built Environment

High-resolution flood risk approach to quantify the impact of policy change on flood losses at community-level

Performance-Based Seismic Design of Midrise Woodframe Buildings