scispace - formally typeset
J

Josélia Oliveira Araújo Firmo

Researcher at Oswaldo Cruz Foundation

Publications -  146
Citations -  4256

Josélia Oliveira Araújo Firmo is an academic researcher from Oswaldo Cruz Foundation. The author has contributed to research in topics: Population & Cohort study. The author has an hindex of 36, co-authored 126 publications receiving 3837 citations. Previous affiliations of Josélia Oliveira Araújo Firmo include Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes mortality burden of cardiometabolic risk factors from 1980 to 2010: a comparative risk assessment.

Goodarz Danaei, +340 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used data for exposure to risk factors by country, age group, and sex from pooled analyses of population-based health surveys and obtained relative risks for the eff ects of risk factors on cause-specifi c mortality from meta-analyses of large prospective studies.
Journal ArticleDOI

Validity of self-reported hypertension and its determinants (the Bambuí study)

TL;DR: The results of this study show that self-reported hypertension is an appropriate indicator of hypertension prevalence, even in a population not living in a large urban center.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hypertension and clustering of cardiovascular risk factors in a community in Southeast Brazil: the Bambuí Health and Ageing Study

TL;DR: The results reinforce the need to increase detection and treatment of hypertension and to approach patients' global risk profiles with a greater focus on older adults.
Journal ArticleDOI

The structure of self-rated health among older adults: the Bambuí health and ageing study (BHAS)

TL;DR: The results show that self-rated health among older adults is multidimensional in structure, being influenced by socioeconomic conditions, social support, health status (with emphasis on mental health), and access to/use of healthcare services.
Journal ArticleDOI

Bipolar disorder prevalence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

TL;DR: It is confirmed that estimates of BD type 1 and type 2 prevalence are low in the general population and the increase in prevalence from DSM- III and DSM-III-R to DSM-IV may reflect different factors, such as minor changes in diagnostic operationalization, use of different assessment instruments, or even a genuine increase in the prevalence of BD.