抗原变异可使得多种致病微生物易于逃避宿主免疫应答。表达在感染红细胞表面的恶性疟原虫红细胞表面蛋白1（PfPMP1）与感染红细胞、内皮细胞、树突状细胞以及胎盘的单个或多个受体作用，在黏附及免疫逃避中起关键的作用。每个单倍体基因组var基因家族编码约60种成员，通过启动转录不同的var基因变异体为抗原变异提供了分子基础。

疟原虫var基因转换速率变化导致抗原变异[英]／Paul H, Robert P, Christodoulou Z, et al//Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

In eukaryotic cells, a multitude of RNA-binding proteins play key roles in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. Characterization of these proteins has led to the identification of several RNA-binding motifs, and recent experiments have begun to illustrate how several of them bind RNA. The significance of these interactions is reflected in the recent discoveries that several human and other vertebrate genetic disorders are caused by aberrant expression of RNA-binding proteins. The major RNA-binding motifs are described and examples of how they may function are given.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/265/5172/615.full.pdf

Conserved structures and diversity of functions of RNA-binding proteins.

Dynamic RNA Modifications in Gene Expression Regulation

The helix-loop-helix (HLH) family of transcriptional regulatory proteins are key players in a wide array of developmental processes. Over 240 HLH proteins have been identified to date in organisms ranging from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to humans (6). Studies in Xenopus laevis, Drosophila melanogaster, and mice have convincingly demonstrated that HLH proteins are intimately involved in developmental events such as cellular differentiation, lineage commitment, and sex determination. In yeast, HLH proteins regulate several important metabolic pathways, including phosphate uptake and phospholipid biosynthesis (19, 67, 112). In multicellular organisms, HLH factors are required for a multitude of important developmental processes, including neurogenesis, myogenesis, hematopoiesis, and pancreatic development (12, 86, 127, 179). The purpose of this review is to examine the structure and functional properties of HLH proteins.



E-box sites: elements mediating cell-type-specific gene transcription. 
Gene transcription of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) gene has long been known to be regulated, in part, by a cis-acting DNA element known as the IgH intronic enhancer (109, 156). By in vivo methylation protection assays, a number of sites were identified in both the IgH and the kappa light-chain gene enhancers which were specifically protected in B cells but not in nonlymphoid cells (41). These elements shared a signature motif which consisted of the core hexanucleotide sequence, CANNTG, and were subsequently dubbed E boxes (41). A total of five E-box elements are present in the IgH gene enhancer: μE1, μE2, μE3, μE4, and μE5. The Ig kappa enhancer also contains three cannonical E boxes, designated κE1, κE2, and κE3. E-box sites have been subsequently found in B-cell-specific promoter and enhancer elements, including a subset of Ig light-chain gene promoters, the IgH and Ig light-chain 3′ enhancers, and, more recently, the λ5 promoter (110, 118, 156).

E-box elements have also been identified in promoter and enhancer elements that regulate muscle-, neuron-, and pancreas-specific gene expression. For example, in muscle, the muscle creatine kinase gene, acetylcholine receptor genes α and δ, and the myosin light-chain gene all require E-box elements for full activity (27, 51, 85). A number of genes whose expression is limited to the pancreas also require E-box sites for proper expression. The insulin and somatostatin genes, for example, contain E-box sites that, when multimerized, are sufficient to regulate pancreatic β-cell-specific gene expression (168). More recently, E-box regulatory sites have been identified in a number of neuron-specific genes, including the opsin, hippocalcin, beta 2 subunit of the neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor, and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor genes (1, 21, 52, 125).




E-box sites: cognate recognition sequence for HLH proteins. 
Two proteins, termed E12 and E47, were originally identified as binding to the κE2/μE5 site (65, 102). They have a region of homology with the Drosophila Daughterless protein, the myogenic differentiation factor MyoD, members of the achaete-scute gene complex, and the Myc family of transcription factors (102). This stretch of conserved residues, known as the Myc homology region, appeared to be critical for the DNA binding properties of E12 and E47 (102). The E12 and E47 proteins, which differ only within this Myc homology region, arise by alternative splicing of the E2A gene (157). This conserved sequence, which was modeled as two amphipathic alpha helices separated by a flexible loop structure, was named the HLH motif and shown to function as a dimerization domain.




The HLH structure. 
The solution structure of the basic HLH (bHLH)-leucine zipper (LZ) factor Max first confirmed the existence of the HLH motif (44). Subsequently, the three-dimensional structure of the E47 bHLH polypeptide bound to its E-box recognition site, CACCTG, has been solved at 2.8-Å resolution (38). A number of interesting features were revealed from analysis of the E47 crystal structure. The E47 dimer forms a parallel, four-helix bundle which allows the basic region to contact the major groove (38). In addition to the basic region, residues in the loop and helix 2 also make contact with DNA (38). Stable interaction of the HLH domain is favored by van der Waals interactions between conserved hydrophobic residues (38). The E47 dimer is centered over the E box, with each monomer interacting with either a CAC or CAG half-site. A glutamate present in the basic region of each subunit makes contact with the cytosine and adenine bases in the E-box half-site. An adjacent arginine residue stabilizes the position of the glutamate by direct interaction with these nucleotides and additionally the phosphodiester backbone. Both the glutamate and the arginine residues are conserved in most bHLH proteins, consistent with a role in specific DNA binding (6, 38, 102).




Classification of the HLH proteins. 
Owing to the large number of HLH proteins that have been described, a classification scheme that was based upon tissue distribution, dimerization capabilities, and DNA-binding specificities was devised (Fig. ​(Fig.1)1) (101). Class I HLH proteins, also known as the E proteins, include E12, E47, HEB, E2-2, and Daughterless. These proteins are expressed in many tissues and capable of forming either homo- or heterodimers (103). The DNA-binding specificity of class I proteins is limited to the E-box site. Class II HLH proteins, which include members such as MyoD, myogenin, Atonal, NeuroD/BETA2, and the achaete-scute complex, show a tissue-restricted pattern of expression. With few exceptions, they are incapable of forming homodimers and preferentially heterodimerize with the E proteins. Class I-class II heterodimers can bind both canonical and noncanonical E-box sites (103). Class III HLH proteins include the Myc family of transcription factors, TFE3, SREBP-1, and the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor, Mi. Proteins of this class contain an LZ adjacent to the HLH motif (66, 177). Class IV HLH proteins define a family of molecules, including Mad, Max, and Mxi, that are capable of dimerizing with the Myc proteins or with one another (7, 22, 174). A group of HLH proteins that lack a basic region, including Id and emc, define the class V HLH proteins (18, 39, 47). Class V members are negative regulators of class I and class II HLH proteins (18, 39, 47). Class VI HLH proteins have as their defining feature a proline in their basic region. This group includes the Drosophila proteins Hairy and Enhancer of split (76, 141). Finally, the class VII HLH proteins are categorized by the presence of the bHLH-PAS domain and include members such as the aromatic hydrocarbon receptor (AHR), the AHR nuclear-translocator (Arnt), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α, and the Drosophila Single-minded and Period proteins (34). 



FIG. 1

Multiple sequence alignment and classification of some representative members of the HLH family of transcription factors. Shown is a dendrogram created by aligning the sequences of the indicated HLH proteins by the Clustal W algorithm (160).



Recently, another classification method of HLH proteins has been described (6). Based on the amino acid sequences of 242 HLH proteins, a phylogenetic tree was created to group family members according to evolutionary relationships (6). Four major groups, A through D, which comprise more than 24 protein families were identified (6). The groupings were based upon DNA-binding specificity as well as conservation of amino acids at certain positions (6). As the number of HLH proteins continues to grow, this evolutionary or “natural” classification may provide a more accurate and convenient means of categorization.

Helix-loop-helix proteins: regulators of transcription in eucaryotic organisms.

Evidence accumulated over the past decade shows that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are widely expressed and have key roles in gene regulation. Recent studies have begun to unravel how the biogenesis of lncRNAs is distinct from that of mRNAs and is linked with their specific subcellular localizations and functions. Depending on their localization and their specific interactions with DNA, RNA and proteins, lncRNAs can modulate chromatin function, regulate the assembly and function of membraneless nuclear bodies, alter the stability and translation of cytoplasmic mRNAs and interfere with signalling pathways. Many of these functions ultimately affect gene expression in diverse biological and physiopathological contexts, such as in neuronal disorders, immune responses and cancer. Tissue-specific and condition-specific expression patterns suggest that lncRNAs are potential biomarkers and provide a rationale to target them clinically. In this Review, we discuss the mechanisms of lncRNA biogenesis, localization and functions in transcriptional, post-transcriptional and other modes of gene regulation, and their potential therapeutic applications.

/pdf/gene-regulation-by-long-non-coding-rnas-and-its-biological-25d7y97amp.pdf

Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions.

Internal bases in mRNA can be subjected to modifications that influence the fate of mRNA in cells. One of the most prevalent modified bases is found at the 5' end of mRNA, at the first encoded nucleotide adjacent to the 7-methylguanosine cap. Here we show that this nucleotide, N6,2'-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am), is a reversible modification that influences cellular mRNA fate. Using a transcriptome-wide map of m6Am we find that m6Am-initiated transcripts are markedly more stable than mRNAs that begin with other nucleotides. We show that the enhanced stability of m6Am-initiated transcripts is due to resistance to the mRNA-decapping enzyme DCP2. Moreover, we find that m6Am is selectively demethylated by fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO). FTO preferentially demethylates m6Am rather than N6-methyladenosine (m6A), and reduces the stability of m6Am mRNAs. Together, these findings show that the methylation status of m6Am in the 5' cap is a dynamic and reversible epitranscriptomic modification that determines mRNA stability.

Reversible methylation of m6Am in the 5′ cap controls mRNA stability

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) are thought to influence the structure of hnRNA and participate in the processing of hnRNA to mRNA. The hnRNP U protein is an abundant nucleoplasmic phosphoprotein that is the largest of the major hnRNP proteins (120 kDa by SDS-PAGE). HnRNP U binds pre-mRNA in vivo and binds both RNA and ssDNA in vitro. Here we describe the cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding the hnRNP U protein, the determination of its amino acid sequence and the delineation of a region in this protein that confers RNA binding. The predicted amino acid sequence of hnRNP U contains 806 amino acids (88,939 Daltons), and shows no extensive homology to any known proteins. The N-terminus is rich in acidic residues and the C-terminus is glycine-rich. In addition, a glutamine-rich stretch, a putative NTP binding site and a putative nuclear localization signal are present. It could not be defined from the sequence what segment of the protein confers its RNA binding activity. We identified an RNA binding activity within the C-terminal glycine-rich 112 amino acids. This region, designated U protein glycine-rich RNA binding region (U-gly), can by itself bind RNA. Furthermore, fusion of U-gly to a heterologous bacterial protein (maltose binding protein) converts this fusion protein into an RNA binding protein. A 26 amino acid peptide within U-gly is necessary for the RNA binding activity of the U protein. Interestingly, this peptide contains a cluster of RGG repeats with characteristic spacing and this motif is found also in several other RNA binding proteins. We have termed this region the RGG box and propose that it is an RNA binding motif and a predictor of RNA binding activity.

Primary structure and binding activity of the hnRNP U protein: binding RNA through RGG box.

Activity of the immunoglobulin heavy and kappa light chain gene enhancers depends on a complex interplay of ubiquitous and developmentally regulated proteins. Two complementary DNAs were isolated that encode proteins, denoted ITF-1 and ITF-2, that are expressed in a variety of cell types and bind the microE5/kappa 2 motif found in both heavy and kappa light chain enhancers. The complementary DNAs are the products of distinct genes, yet both ITF-1 and ITF-2 are structurally and functionally similar. The two proteins interact with one another through their putative helix-loop-helix motifs and each possesses a distinct domain that dictates transcription activation.

https://science.sciencemag.org/content/sci/247/4941/467.full.pdf

Two distinct transcription factors that bind the immunoglobulin enhancer microE5/kappa 2 motif

Decapping of mRNA is a critical step in eukaryotic mRNA turnover, yet the proteins involved in this activity remain elusive in mammals. We identified the human Dcp2 protein (hDcp2) as an enzyme containing intrinsic decapping activity. hDcp2 specifically hydrolyzed methylated capped RNA to release m7GDP; however, it did not function on the cap structure alone. hDcp2 is therefore functionally distinct from the recently identified mammalian scavenger decapping enzyme, DcpS. hDcp2-mediated decapping required a functional Nudix (nucleotide diphosphate linked to an X moiety) pyrophosphatase motif as mutations in conserved amino acids within this motif disrupted the decapping activity. hDcp2 is detected exclusively in the cytoplasm and predominantly cosediments with polysomes. Consistent with the localization of hDcp2, endogenous Dcp2-like decapping activity was detected in polysomal fractions prepared from mammalian cells. Similar to decapping in yeast, the presence of the poly(A) tail was inhibitory to the endogenous decapping activity, yet unlike yeast, competition of cap-binding proteins by cap analog did not influence the efficiency of decapping. Therefore the mammalian homologue of the yeast Dcp2 protein is an mRNA decapping enzyme demonstrated to contain intrinsic decapping activity.

https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/99/20/12663.full.pdf

The hDcp2 protein is a mammalian mRNA decapping enzyme.

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are endogenous single-stranded RNA molecules of about 21 nucleotides in length that are fundamental post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression. Although the transcriptional and processing events involved in the generation of miRNAs have been extensively studied, very little is known pertaining to components that regulate the stability of individual miRNAs. All RNAs have distinct inherent half-lives that dictate their level of accumulation and miRNAs would be expected to follow a similar principle. Here we demonstrate that although most miRNA appear to be stable, like mRNAs, miRNAs possess differential stability in human cells. In particular, we found that miR-382, a miRNA that contributes to HIV-1 provirus latency, is unstable in cells. To determine the region of miR-382 responsible for its rapid decay, we developed a cell-free system that recapitulated the observed cell-based-regulated miR-382 turnover. The system utilizes in vitro-processed mature miRNA derived from pre-miRNA and follows the decay of the processed miRNA. Using this system, we demonstrate that instability of miR-382 is driven by sequences outside its seed region and required the 39 terminal seven nucleotides where mutations in this region increased the stability of the RNA. Moreover, the exosome 39–59 exoribonuclease complex was identified as the primary nuclease involved in miR-382 decay with a more modest contribution by the Xrn1 and no detectable contribution by Xrn2. These studies provide evidence for an miRNA element essential for rapid miRNA decay and implicate the exosome in this process. The development of a biochemically amendable system to analyze the mechanism of differential miRNA stability provides an important step in efforts to regulate gene expression by modulating miRNA stability.

/pdf/differential-regulation-of-microrna-stability-1zfjqs2yfn.pdf

Megerditch Kiledjian

Papers

Reversible methylation of m6Am in the 5′ cap controls mRNA stability

Primary structure and binding activity of the hnRNP U protein: binding RNA through RGG box.

Two distinct transcription factors that bind the immunoglobulin enhancer microE5/kappa 2 motif

The hDcp2 protein is a mammalian mRNA decapping enzyme.

Differential regulation of microRNA stability