M
Michael S. Bernstein
Researcher at Stanford University
Publications - 207
Citations - 59397
Michael S. Bernstein is an academic researcher from Stanford University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Crowdsourcing & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 52, co-authored 191 publications receiving 42744 citations. Previous affiliations of Michael S. Bernstein include Association for Computing Machinery & Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Papers
More filters
Posted Content
Visual Relationships as Functions: Enabling Few-Shot Scene Graph Prediction
TL;DR: In this article, a scene graph prediction model is proposed that supports few-shot learning of predicates, enabling scene graph approaches to generalize to a set of new predicates.
Visually Prototyping Physical UIs through Statecharts
TL;DR: d.tools is a design tool for prototyping the bits and the atoms of physical user interfaces in concert that enables designers without specialized engineering or programming knowledge to quickly build functional interactive prototypes.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Designing Creativity Support Tools for Failure
TL;DR: This work develops a taxonomy of creative activities that people engage in when they aim to succeed and proposes flipping the value of failure in creativity tools from something to avoid to something to pursue actively to better support experiences of failure for novices.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Embracing Error to Enable Rapid Crowdsourcing
Ranjay Krishna,Kenji Hata,Stephanie Chen,Joshua Kravitz,David A. Shamma,Li Fei-Fei,Michael S. Bernstein +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a technique that produces extremely rapid judgments for binary and categorical labels, rather than punishing all errors, which causes workers to proceed slowly and deliberately, and demonstrate that it is possible to rectify these errors by randomizing task order and modeling response latency.
Proceedings ArticleDOI
Understanding the Representation and Representativeness of Age in AI Data Sets
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine publicly available information about 92 face data sets to understand how they codify age as a case study to investigate how the subjects' ages are recorded and whether older generations are represented.