scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Nichola Johnson published in 2010"


Journal ArticleDOI
Roger L. Milne, Mia M. Gaudet1, Amanda B. Spurdle2, Peter A. Fasching3, Fergus J. Couch4, Javier Benitez, Jose Ignacio Arias Perez, M. Pilar Zamora5, Núria Malats, Isabel dos Santos Silva6, Lorna Gibson6, Olivia Fletcher7, Nichola Johnson7, Hoda Anton-Culver8, Argyrios Ziogas8, Jonine D. Figueroa, Louise A. Brinton, Mark E. Sherman, Jolanta Lissowska, John L. Hopper9, Gillian S. Dite9, Carmel Apicella9, Melissa C. Southey9, Alice J. Sigurdson, Martha S. Linet, Sara J. Schonfeld, D. Michal Freedman, Arto Mannermaa10, Veli-Matti Kosma10, Vesa Kataja, Päivi Auvinen, Irene L. Andrulis11, Irene L. Andrulis12, Irene L. Andrulis13, Gord Glendon13, Julia A. Knight12, Julia A. Knight11, Nayana Weerasooriya13, Angela Cox14, Malcolm Wr Reed14, Simon S. Cross14, Alison M. Dunning15, Shahana Ahmed15, Mitul Shah15, Hiltrud Brauch16, Yon-Dschun Ko, Thomas Brüning17, Diether Lambrechts18, Joke Reumers18, Ann Smeets18, Shan Wang-Gohrke19, Per Hall20, Kamila Czene20, Jianjun Liu21, Astrid K. Irwanto21, Georgia Chenevix-Trench2, Helene Holland2, kConFab22, Aocs2, Graham G. Giles9, Graham G. Giles23, Graham G. Giles24, Laura Baglietto24, Laura Baglietto9, Gianluca Severi9, Gianluca Severi24, Stig E Bojensen25, Børge G. Nordestgaard25, Henrik Flyger25, Esther M. John26, Esther M. John27, Dee W. West27, Dee W. West26, Alice S. Whittemore27, Celine M. Vachon4, Janet E. Olson4, Zachary S. Fredericksen4, Matthew L. Kosel4, Rebecca Hein28, Alina Vrieling28, Dieter Flesch-Janys29, J Heinz29, Matthias W. Beckmann30, Katharina Heusinger30, Arif B. Ekici31, Lothar Haeberle30, Manjeet K. Humphreys15, Jonathan J. Morrison15, Doug Easton15, Paul D.P. Pharoah15, Montserrat Garcia-Closas15, Ellen L. Goode4, Jenny Chang-Claude 
TL;DR: The relative risks for breast cancer associated with the common susceptibility variants identified to date do not appear to vary across women with different reproductive histories or body mass index (BMI); the assumption of multiplicative combined effects for these established genetic and other risk factors in risk prediction models appears justified.
Abstract: Several common breast cancer genetic susceptibility variants have recently been identified. We aimed to determine how these variants combine with a subset of other known risk factors to influence breast cancer risk in white women of European ancestry using case-control studies participating in the Breast Cancer Association Consortium. We evaluated two-way interactions between each of age at menarche, ever having had a live birth, number of live births, age at first birth and body mass index (BMI) and each of 12 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) (10q26-rs2981582 (FGFR2), 8q24-rs13281615, 11p15-rs3817198 (LSP1), 5q11-rs889312 (MAP3K1), 16q12-rs3803662 (TOX3), 2q35-rs13387042, 5p12-rs10941679 (MRPS30), 17q23-rs6504950 (COX11), 3p24-rs4973768 (SLC4A7), CASP8-rs17468277, TGFB1-rs1982073 and ESR1-rs3020314). Interactions were tested for by fitting logistic regression models including per-allele and linear trend main effects for SNPs and risk factors, respectively, and single-parameter interaction terms for linear departure from independent multiplicative effects. These analyses were applied to data for up to 26,349 invasive breast cancer cases and up to 32,208 controls from 21 case-control studies. No statistical evidence of interaction was observed beyond that expected by chance. Analyses were repeated using data from 11 population-based studies, and results were very similar. The relative risks for breast cancer associated with the common susceptibility variants identified to date do not appear to vary across women with different reproductive histories or body mass index (BMI). The assumption of multiplicative combined effects for these established genetic and other risk factors in risk prediction models appears justified.

97 citations