scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Philippe Maingon published in 2020"




Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The presence of LNS in ypN0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT is associated with an increased risk of recurrence and may be taken into account for the discussion of adjuvant chemotherapy.

3 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The VMAT approach seemed to improve the sparing of the key brain areas implied in cognitive functions without jeopardizing PTV coverage.
Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this prospective dosimetric study was to assess the dose distribution regarding the brain areas implied in cognitive functions using two approaches: volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and helical tomotherapy (HT). Patients and methods Thirty-seven patients were treated using a dual-arc VMAT approach for supratentorial glioblastoma between 2016 and 2018. The total dose of 60 Gy in 30 daily fractions was administered to the planning target volume (PTV). The brain structures that play an important role in cognitive physiology, such as the hippocampi, corpus callosum, cerebellum, subventricular zones (SVZ), were delineated. For each patient, a new treatment plan in HT was determined by a second medical physicist in a blindly fashion according to the same dose constraints and priorities. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon-signed rank test. Results Conformity indexes remained similar with both techniques. The mean values were 0.96 (0.19–1.00) for VMAT and 0.98 (range, 0.84–1.00) for HT, respectively (P = 0.73). Significant D50% reductions were observed with VMAT compared to HT: 14.6 Gy (3.8–28.0) versus 17.4 Gy (12.1–25.0) for the normal brain (P = 0.014); 32.5 Gy (10.3–60.0) versus 35.6 Gy (17.1–58.0) for the corpus callosum (P = 0.038); 8.1 Gy (0.4–34.0) versus 12.8 Gy (0.8–27.0) for the cerebellum (P Conclusion The VMAT approach seemed to improve the sparing of the key brain areas implied in cognitive functions without jeopardizing PTV coverage.

3 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The place of intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of patients suffering from non-tumoral refractory neurological pathologies is defined and the multidisciplinary collaboration of experienced teams from Neurosurgery, Neurology, Neuroradiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics is needed.
Abstract: Intracranial radiotherapy has been improved, primarily because of the development of stereotactic approaches. While intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy is mainly indicated for treatment of benign or malignant tumors, this procedure is also effective in the management of other neurological pathologies; it is delivered using GammaKnife® and linear accelerators. Thus, brain arteriovenous malformations in patients who are likely to experience permanent neurological sequelae can be managed by single session intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy, or radiosurgery, in specific situations, with an advantageous benefit/risk ratio. Radiosurgery can be recommended for patients with disabling symptoms, which are poorly controlled by medication, such as trigeminal neuralgia, and tremors, whether they are essential or secondary to Parkinson's disease. This literature review aims at defining the place of intracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy in the management of patients suffering from non-tumoral refractory neurological pathologies. It is clear that the multidisciplinary collaboration of experienced teams from Neurosurgery, Neurology, Neuroradiology, Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics is needed for the procedures using high precision radiotherapy techniques, which deliver high doses to locations near functional brain areas.

1 citations