scispace - formally typeset
S

Sharmila Majumdar

Researcher at University of California, San Francisco

Publications -  505
Citations -  29773

Sharmila Majumdar is an academic researcher from University of California, San Francisco. The author has contributed to research in topics: Osteoarthritis & Cartilage. The author has an hindex of 88, co-authored 477 publications receiving 27074 citations. Previous affiliations of Sharmila Majumdar include University of California & Georgia Regents University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Multiparametric MRI characterization of knee articular cartilage and subchondral bone shape in collegiate basketball players.

TL;DR: Several characteristics associated with a high‐knee impact are identified which may expand the understanding of local degenerative patterns in this population of athletes and help to understand the causes of biochemical and structural degeneration.
Journal ArticleDOI

Personalized Risk Model and Leveraging of Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Based Structural Phenotypes and Clinical Factors to Predict Incidence of Radiographic Osteoarthritis

TL;DR: Four ROAMES phenotypes may contribute to time to radiographic OA incidence and if validated could be used as promising tool for personalized OA management.
Journal ArticleDOI

Weight Cycling and Knee Joint Degeneration in Individuals with Overweight or Obesity: Four-Year Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the associations between weight cycling and knee joint degeneration in individuals with overweight or obesity with different patterns of weight change over 4n-years and found no significant differences in the rate of change of cartilage thickness or T2 between weight cyclers and noncyclers.
Book ChapterDOI

Evaluation of trabecular bone orientation in wrists of young volunteers using MR relaxometry and high resolution MRI.

TL;DR: Two principally different techniques using magnetic resonance (MR) have been developed and several studies have shown that both methods can evaluate trabecular bone structure in vitro, however, proving that the methods also are able to evaluate trABecularBone structure in vivo is a difficult task, as there are no non-invasive methods to evaluatetrabecULAR bone structure at resolutions comparable to those obtained in vitro.