scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Viviana Consonni published in 2021"


Journal ArticleDOI
Kamel Mansouri1, Agnes L. Karmaus, Jeremy M. Fitzpatrick1, Grace Patlewicz1, Prachi Pradeep1, Prachi Pradeep2, Domenico Alberga3, Nathalie Alépée4, Timothy E. H. Allen5, D Allen, Vinicius M. Alves6, Vinicius M. Alves7, Carolina Horta Andrade7, Tyler R. Auernhammer8, Davide Ballabio9, Shannon M. Bell, Emilio Benfenati10, Sudin Bhattacharya11, Joyce V. Bastos7, Stephen Boyd11, James B. Brown12, Stephen J. Capuzzi6, Yaroslav Chushak13, Heather L. Ciallella14, Alex M. Clark, Viviana Consonni9, Pankaj R. Daga15, Sean Ekins, Sherif Farag6, Maxim V. Fedorov16, Denis Fourches17, Domenico Gadaleta10, Feng Gao11, Jeffery M. Gearhart13, Garett Goh18, Jonathan M. Goodman5, Francesca Grisoni9, Christopher M. Grulke1, Thomas Hartung19, Matthew J. Hirn11, Pavel Karpov, Alexandru Korotcov, Giovanna J. Lavado10, Michael S. Lawless15, Xinhao Li17, Thomas Luechtefeld19, F. Lunghini20, Giuseppe Felice Mangiatordi3, Gilles Marcou20, Dan Marsh19, Todd M. Martin21, Andrea Mauri, Eugene N. Muratov7, Eugene N. Muratov6, Glenn J. Myatt, Dac-Trung Nguyen22, Orazio Nicolotti3, Paritosh Pande18, Amanda K. Parks8, Tyler Peryea22, Ahsan Habib Polash12, Robert Rallo18, Alessandra Roncaglioni10, Craig Rowlands19, Patricia Ruiz23, Daniel P. Russo14, Ahmed Sayed, Risa Sayre2, Risa Sayre1, Timothy Sheils22, Charles Siegel18, Arthur C. Silva7, Anton Simeonov22, Sergey Sosnin16, Noel Southall22, Judy Strickland, Yun Tang24, Brian J. Teppen11, Igor V. Tetko, Dennis G. Thomas18, Valery Tkachenko, R Todeschini9, Cosimo Toma10, Ignacio J. Tripodi25, Daniela Trisciuzzi3, Alexander Tropsha6, Alexandre Varnek20, Kristijan Vukovic10, Zhongyu Wang26, Liguo Wang26, Katrina M. Waters18, Andrew J. Wedlake5, Sanjeeva J. Wijeyesakere8, Daniel M. Wilson8, Zijun Xiao26, Hongbin Yang24, Gergely Zahoranszky-Kohalmi22, Alexey V. Zakharov22, Fagen F. Zhang8, Zhen Zhang27, Tongan Zhao22, Hao Zhu14, Kimberley M. Zorn, Warren Casey1, Nicole Kleinstreuer1 
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors proposed a method to assess tens of thousands of chemical substances that need to be assessed for their potential toxicity, which serves as the basis for regulatory testing.
Abstract: Background: Humans are exposed to tens of thousands of chemical substances that need to be assessed for their potential toxicity. Acute systemic toxicity testing serves as the basis for regulatory ...

38 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The regression toolbox for MATLAB is described, which is a collection of modules for calculating some well-known regression methods: Ordinary Least Squares, Partial Le least Squares (PLS), Principal Component Regression (PCR), Ridge and local regression based on sample similarities, such as Binned Nearest Neighbours and k-NearestNeighbours regression methods.

14 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: DNA mini-barcoding and infrared spectroscopy failed in the taxonomic distinction, whereas enabled PLS-DA classification of aged samples (and thus the identification of fresh prepared artisanal products) with model non-error rate in fitting equal to 0.96 and 0.89.
Abstract: Tuna “Bottarga” is an artisanal food speciality prepared from the roe of Bluefin Tuna (Thunnus thynnus). Due to the recent restriction of Tuna catches fixed by EU, cheaper substitutes from yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) are currently available in the mass distribution. Since the product is sold sliced or grated, morphological distinctive features may be lost, and fraudulent substitution is possible. In this study we tested DNA mini-barcoding and infrared spectroscopy as tools to trace its authenticity. A certified chemical standard, fresh (n = 4) and processed (n = 11) ovarian identified by the morphological observation of the tuna catches, commercial bottargasamples (n = 5) and artificial aged aliquots of all these samples (n = 50) were used in the experiments. The results showed that infrared spectroscopy failed in the taxonomic distinction, whereas enabled PLS-DA classification of aged samples (and thus the identification of fresh prepared artisanal products) with model non-error rate in fitting equal to 0.96, and 0.89 in cross-validation. Conversely, DNA mini-barcoding with mtDNA control region, success in species identification (100% maximum identity by the standard comparison BLAST approach against GenBank), regardless the processing state of the product.

8 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared four of the most widely used approaches for tuning hyperparameters, namely, grid search, random search, tree-structured Parzen estimator, and genetic algorithms on three multitask QSAR datasets.
Abstract: Neural networks are rapidly gaining popularity in chemical modeling and Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship (QSAR) thanks to their ability to handle multitask problems. However, outcomes of neural networks depend on the tuning of several hyperparameters, whose small variations can often strongly affect their performance. Hence, optimization is a fundamental step in training neural networks although, in many cases, it can be very expensive from a computational point of view. In this study, we compared four of the most widely used approaches for tuning hyperparameters, namely, grid search, random search, tree-structured Parzen estimator, and genetic algorithms on three multitask QSAR datasets. We mainly focused on parsimonious optimization and thus not only on the performance of neural networks, but also the computational time that was taken into account. Furthermore, since the optimization approaches do not directly provide information about the influence of hyperparameters, we applied experimental design strategies to determine their effects on the neural network performance. We found that genetic algorithms, tree-structured Parzen estimator, and random search require on average 0.08% of the hours required by grid search; in addition, tree-structured Parzen estimator and genetic algorithms provide better results than random search.

5 citations